Could category-specific semantic deficits reflect differences in the distribution of features within a unified semantic memory?

Book synopsis: This volume features the complete text of the material presented at the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. As in previous years, the symposium included an interesting mixture of papers on many topics from researchers with diverse backgrounds and different goals, presenting a multifaceted view of cognitive science. This volume contains papers, posters, and summaries of symposia presented at the leading conference that brings cognitive scientists together to discuss issues of theoretical and applied concern. Submitted presentations are represented in these proceedings as "long papers" (those presented as spoken presentations and "full posters" at the conference) and "short papers" (those presented as "abstract posters" by members of the Cognitive Science Society).

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[2]  Elaine Funnell,et al.  Categories of knowledge? unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things , 1992 .

[3]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  The oyster with four legs: a neuropsychological study on the interaction of visual and semantic information , 1998 .

[4]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .

[5]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Robert M. French,et al.  Pseudo-recurrent Connectionist Networks: An Approach to the 'Sensitivity-Stability' Dilemma , 1997, Connect. Sci..

[7]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts , 1992 .

[8]  E K Warrington,et al.  Concrete word dyslexia. , 1981, British journal of psychology.

[9]  Anthony V. Robins,et al.  Catastrophic Forgetting, Rehearsal and Pseudorehearsal , 1995, Connect. Sci..

[10]  Guido Gainotti,et al.  Cognitive and anatomical locus of lesion in a patient with a category-specific semantic impairment for living beings , 1996 .

[11]  D. Howard,et al.  Abstract word anomia , 1995 .

[12]  E. Warrington,et al.  Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Joseph P. Levy,et al.  The distinctiveness of form and function in category structure: A connectionist model , 1997 .

[14]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Richard South,et al.  The butterflies of the British Isles , 1906 .

[16]  W. F. K.,et al.  The Butterflies of the British Isles , 1906, Nature.

[17]  Robert M. French Selective memory loss in aphasics: An insight from pseudo-recurrent connectionist networks , 1997, NCPW.

[18]  Maria Caterina Silveri Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment , 1998 .

[19]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Double Dissociation of Semantic Categories in Alzheimer's Disease , 1997, Brain and Language.

[20]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  The oyster with four legs: A neuropsychological study on the interaction of visual and semantic information , 1998 .

[21]  M. Silveri,et al.  Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment , 1988 .

[22]  Argye E. Hillis,et al.  Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: a double dissociation , 1998 .

[23]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[24]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? , 1990 .

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Martha J Farah,et al.  The Living/Nonliving Dissociation is Not an Artifact: Giving an A Priori Implausible Hypothesis a Strong Test. , 1996, Cognitive neuropsychology.