Limitations of demand- and pressure-driven modeling for large deficient networks

Abstract. The calculation of hydraulic state variables for a network is an important task in managing the distribution of potable water. Over the years the mathematical modeling process has been improved by numerous researchers for utilization in new computer applications and the more realistic modeling of water distribution networks. But, in spite of these continuous advances, there are still a number of physical phenomena that may not be tackled correctly by current models. This paper will take a closer look at the two modeling paradigms given by demand- and pressure-driven modeling. The basic equations are introduced and parallels are drawn with the optimization formulations from electrical engineering. These formulations guarantee the existence and uniqueness of the solution. One of the central questions of the French and German research project ResiWater is the investigation of the network resilience in the case of extreme events or disasters. Under such extraordinary conditions where models are pushed beyond their limits, we talk about deficient network models. Examples of deficient networks are given by highly regulated flow, leakage or pipe bursts and cases where pressure falls below the vapor pressure of water. These examples will be presented and analyzed on the solvability and physical correctness of the solution with respect to demand- and pressure-driven models.

[1]  E. Abraham,et al.  Sparse Null Space Algorithms for Hydraulic Analysis of Large Scale Water Supply Networks , 2016 .

[2]  Jochen Deuerlein,et al.  Reformulated Co-Tree Flows Method Competitive with the Global Gradient Algorithm for Solving Water Distribution System Equations , 2013 .

[3]  J. E. van Zyl,et al.  Implications of the Known Pressure-response of Individual Leaks for Whole Distribution Systems , 2014 .

[4]  George Germanopoulos,et al.  A technical note on the inclusion of pressure dependent demand and leakage terms in water supply network models , 1985 .

[5]  A. Brameller,et al.  Hybrid method for the solution of piping networks , 1971 .

[6]  Pramod R. Bhave,et al.  Node Flow Analysis Distribution Systems , 1981 .

[7]  Hardy Cross,et al.  Analysis of flow in networks of conduits or conductors , 1936 .

[8]  Olivier Piller,et al.  Least Action Principles Appropriate to Pressure Driven Models of Pipe Networks , 2003 .

[9]  David H. Marks,et al.  Water Distribution Reliability: Simulation Methods , 1988 .

[10]  Antonio M. Vidal,et al.  Improving the Efficiency of the Loop Method for the Simulation of Water Distribution Systems , 2015 .

[11]  E. Todini,et al.  Unified Framework for Deriving Simultaneous Equation Algorithms for Water Distribution Networks , 2013 .

[12]  W. Millar.  CXVI. Some general theorems for non-linear systems possessing resistance , 1951 .

[13]  Tiku T. Tanyimboh,et al.  Pressure-driven modelling of water distribution systems , 2002 .

[14]  Jeffery L. Kennington,et al.  Solving the Pipe Network Analysis Problem Using Optimization Techniques , 1978 .

[15]  H. B. Nielsen.  Methods for Analyzing Pipe Networks , 1989 .

[16]  G. Birkhoff.  A variational principle for nonlinear networks , 1963 .

[17]  P. Sivakumar,et al.  Nonunique Steady States in Water Distribution Networks with Flow Control Valves , 2016 .

[18]  Jochen Deuerlein,et al.  A Robust, Rapidly Convergent Method That Solves the Water Distribution Equations for Pressure-Dependent Models , 2016 .

[19]  Orazio Giustolisi,et al.  Pressure-Driven Demand and Leakage Simulation for Water Distribution Networks , 2008 .

[20]  Colin Cherry M.Sc. A.M.I.E.E..  CXVII. Some general theorems for non-linear systems possessing reactance , 1951 .

[21]  Idel Montalvo,et al.  Preprocessing of water distribution systems to assess connectivity and solvability in the presence of flow control devices , 2012 .