Supervisor-subordinate guanxi: A meta-analytic review and future research agenda

Abstract The present research focuses on supervisor-subordinate guanxi (SSG) – a non-work or personal tie that reflects the relationship between a subordinate and their supervisor. Although SSG has received considerable attention, results are mixed. Further, how the Eastern conceptualization of SSG differs from the Western conceptualization of leader-member exchange (LMX) remains nebulous. We meta-analyzed 71 samples that contain 238 effect sizes. We found that: (1) SSG has a strong overlap with LMX (ρ = 0.56); (2) SSG has small magnitude relations with its correlates (age, gender, education, and tenure); (3) SSG demonstrates smaller relative weights than LMX in predicting outcome variables (task performance, organizational citizenship behavior, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, subordinates' perceived distributive justice, subordinates' perceived procedural justice, and trust in supervisor); and (4) SSG contributes statistically significant, yet very small (ranging from 0.00 to 0.04), incremental validity above and beyond LMX in predicting all of the aforementioned outcome variables except for subordinates' perceived distributive justice. We conclude with a discussion of future directions for research on SSG.

[1]  Scott Tonidandel,et al.  RWA Web: A Free, Comprehensive, Web-Based, and User-Friendly Tool for Relative Weight Analyses , 2014, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[2]  In-Sue Oh,et al.  Transformational Leadership and Performance Across Criteria and Levels: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Research , 2011 .

[3]  Peter B. Smith,et al.  Are Guanxi-Type Supervisor–Subordinate Relationships Culture-General? An Eight-Nation Test of Measurement Invariance , 2012 .

[4]  Anna-Maija Lämsä,et al.  The Leader–Member Exchange Theory in the Chinese Context and the Ethical Challenge of Guanxi , 2015 .

[5]  Ronald S. Landis,et al.  Successfully Combining Meta-analysis and Structural Equation Modeling: Recommendations and Strategies , 2013 .

[6]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[8]  C. Schriesheim,et al.  Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader-member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes , 2009 .

[9]  Brian D. Blume,et al.  Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Methodological Urban Legends: The Misuse of Statistical Control Variables , 2011 .

[11]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Chinese Entrepreneurs, Social Networks, and Guanxi , 2017, Management and Organization Review.

[12]  Yochanan Altman,et al.  Supervisor and Subordinate Guanxi: A Grounded Investigation in the People’s Republic of China , 2009 .

[13]  John M. Maslyn,et al.  Multidimensionafity of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development , 1998 .

[14]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers , 2009 .

[15]  Long Zhang,et al.  Guanxi with Supervisor and Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction , 2016 .

[16]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Jing Wang,et al.  Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behaviour: is supervisor–subordinate guanxi a mediator? , 2013 .

[18]  Xiao-ping Chen,et al.  Chinese Guanxi: An Integrative Review and New Directions for Future Research , 2013, Management and Organization Review.

[19]  George C. Banks,et al.  A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy , 2016 .

[20]  R. Humphrey,et al.  A meta‐analysis of emotional intelligence and work attitudes , 2017 .

[21]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  M. Sturman,et al.  Only time will tell: the changing relationships between LMX, job performance, and justice. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1989, Theoretical Sociology.

[24]  Yong Han,et al.  Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi and Trust in Supervisor: A Qualitative Inquiry in the People’s Republic of China , 2012 .

[25]  R. Humphrey,et al.  Leader emotional intelligence and subordinate job satisfaction:a meta-analysis of main, mediator, and moderator effects , 2016 .

[26]  Chi-Sum Wong,et al.  Antecedents and Outcomes of Employees' Trust in Chinese Joint Ventures , 2003 .

[27]  Zhen Xiong (George) Chen,et al.  Why Do I Feel Valued and Why Do I Contribute? A Relational Approach to Employee's Organization‐Based Self‐Esteem and Job Performance , 2013 .

[28]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  More or less guanxi: Trust is 60% network context, 10% individual difference , 2018, Soc. Networks.

[29]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  Cronyism: a cross-cultural analysis , 2006 .

[30]  J. Shaw,et al.  Positive affectivity and negative outcomes: the role of tenure and job satisfaction. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Chao C. Chen,et al.  Chinese Guanxi: The Good, the Bad and the Controversial , 2012 .

[32]  H. Liao,et al.  Unspoken yet Understood: An Introduction and Initial Framework of Subordinates’ Moqi With Supervisors , 2019 .

[33]  Yu‐Fang Yen,et al.  Examining the mechanisms linking guanxi, norms and knowledge sharing: the mediating roles of trust in Taiwan's high-tech firms , 2012 .

[34]  Workplace guanxi and employee commitment to supervisor in Chinese international joint ventures , 2013 .

[35]  F. Morgeson,et al.  The development of leader-member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time , 2009 .

[36]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[37]  R. Liden,et al.  Multidimensionafity of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development , 1998 .

[38]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[40]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[41]  Jar-der Luo,et al.  Guanxi circle and organizational citizenship behavior: Context of a Chinese workplace , 2016 .

[42]  R. Friedman,et al.  Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi: Developing a Three-Dimensional Model and Scale , 2009, Management and Organization Review.

[43]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Effect of supervisor–subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: an empirical investigation , 2000 .

[44]  Uriel G. Foa,et al.  Interpersonal and Economic Resources , 1971, Science.

[45]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[46]  Long Zhang,et al.  Why do Chinese employees build supervisor-subordinate guanxi? A motivational analysis , 2016 .

[47]  P. Li,et al.  Indigenous Research on Chinese Management: What and How , 2012, Management and Organization Review.

[48]  Chak Fu Lam,et al.  Leader–member exchange and guanxi are not the same: differential impact of dyadic relationships on fit perceptions, helping behavior, and turnover intention , 2017 .

[49]  Chao C. Chen,et al.  On the Intricacies of the Chinese Guanxi: A Process Model of Guanxi Development , 2004 .

[50]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Participative Leadership by American and Chinese Managers in China: Role of Relationships , 2006 .

[51]  Zhen Xiong (George) Chen,et al.  Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model , 2002 .

[52]  Ahmet H. Kirca,et al.  A Multilevel Examination of the Drivers of Firm Multinationality , 2012 .

[53]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  Job Burnout and Employee Engagement , 2012 .

[54]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[55]  Peter B. Smith,et al.  How Distinctive Are Indigenous Ways of Achieving Influence? A Comparative Study of Guanxi, Wasta, Jeitinho, and “Pulling Strings” , 2012 .

[56]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[57]  T. Judge,et al.  Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[58]  M. Lindorff,et al.  Workplace Guanxi: Its Dispositional Antecedents and Mediating Role in the Affectivity–Job Satisfaction Relationship , 2013 .

[59]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[60]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Guanxi and organizational dynamics in China: a link between individual and organizational levels , 2006 .

[61]  Christopher C. Rosen,et al.  Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[62]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  Millissa F. Y. Cheung,et al.  Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi and Employee Work Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction , 2009 .

[64]  K. Hwang.  Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[65]  R. Burt.  Network Disadvantaged Entrepreneurs: Density, Hierarchy, and Success in China and the West , 2018, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

[66]  Yui-tim Wong,et al.  A study of subordinate–supervisor guanxi in Chinese joint ventures , 2010 .

[67]  Long Zhang,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Chinese Motives for Building Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi , 2014 .

[68]  Millissa F. Y. Cheung,et al.  Participatory management and employee work outcomes: The moderating role of supervisor‐subordinate guanxi , 2011 .

[69]  G. J. Greguras,et al.  An examination of the multidimensionality of supervisor and subordinate perceptions of leader-member exchange , 2006 .

[70]  Jeffrey M. Pollack,et al.  What does team–member exchange bring to the party? A meta‐analytic review of team and leader social exchange , 2014 .

[71]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research , 2004 .

[72]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[73]  Jun Liu,et al.  Political Skill, Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi and Career Prospects in Chinese Firms , 2010 .

[74]  Janaki Gooty,et al.  Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: A review and agenda for the future , 2017 .

[75]  James H. Dulebohn,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange , 2012 .

[76]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Publication Bias in the Organizational Sciences , 2012 .

[77]  Ning Li,et al.  Putting non-work ties to work: The case of guanxi in supervisor–subordinate relationships ☆ , 2015 .

[78]  A. Fiske.  The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[79]  Cynthia Lee,et al.  Approaches to Scale Development in Chinese Management Research , 2006, Management and Organization Review.

[80]  Jeremy B. Bernerth,et al.  A Critical Review and Best‐Practice Recommendations for Control Variable Usage , 2016 .

[81]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .