Unnecessary inferences in associative-commutative completion procedures

Theoretical results for identifying unnecessary inferences are discussed in the context of the use of a completion-procedure-based approach toward automated reasoning. The notion of a general superposition is introduced and it is proved that in a completion procedure, once a general superposition is considered, all its instances are unnecessary inferences and, thus, do not have to be considered. It is also shown that this result can be combined with another criterion, called the prime superposition criterion, proposed by Kapur, Musser, and Narendran, thus implying that prime and general superpositions are sufficient. These results should be applicable to other approaches toward automated reasoning, too. These criteria can be effectively implemented, and their implementation has resulted in automatically proving instances of Jacobson's theorem (also known as the ring commutativity problems) usingRRL (Rewrite Rule Laboratory), a theorem prover based on rewriting techniques and completion.