Handling of micro objects using phase transition of thermoresponsive polymer

In this paper, we achieve a handling of micro objects using a phase transition of thermoresponsive polymer solution. The phase transition was controlled by a microheater which is embedded in a tip of probe device. In general, probe devices are one of the important devices for micromanipulation, especially for cell manipulation such as handling of egg cells, stiffness measurement, and patch clamping. However, conventional probe devices have some limitations: difficulties in releasing the handled objects by the effect of surface force and damages to the handled cells by the direct contact. As one solution of those problems, we use phase transition of thermoresponsive polymer solution to control handling and releasing of micro objects. The microheater embedded in the probe tip can generate the thermoresponsive gel. Micro objects can be handled by the generated gel and released by returning the gel to sol again. The manipulation of micro objects and assembly of three dimensional structures were demonstrated by the probe. The thermoresponsive gel generated μN force to fix handled objects in the gel. The multi-scale handling from a yeast cell (less than 10 μm in diameter) to a liposome (more than 100 μm in diameter) was also demonstrated. The handling of micro objects in pure water (not containing thermoresponsive polymer) was finally conducted using a theta tube. Those results validate that the probe can achieve the soft handling by the thermoresponsive gel and the precise positioning by reducing the effect of surface force.

[1]  Fumihito Arai,et al.  Isolation and extraction of target microbes using thermal sol-gel transformation. , 2003, The Analyst.

[2]  Xue-feng Yin,et al.  Novel multi-depth microfluidic chip for single cell analysis. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  Ming C. Wu,et al.  Massively parallel manipulation of single cells and microparticles using optical images , 2005, Nature.

[4]  R Yanagimachi,et al.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. , 1995, Biology of reproduction.

[5]  Jeong-Bong (JB) Lee,et al.  Viable cell handling with high aspect ratio polymer chopstick gripper mounted on a nano precision manipulator , 2008 .

[6]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Gentle cell handling with an ultra-slow instrument: creep-manipulation of cells , 2005 .

[7]  Michaël Gauthier,et al.  Principle of a Submerged Freeze Gripper for Microassembly , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[8]  Cell death along single microfluidic channel after freeze-thaw treatments. , 2010, Biomicrofluidics.

[9]  F. Arai,et al.  On-chip Cell Immobilization and Monitoring System Using Thermosensitive Gel Controlled by Suspended Polymeric Microbridge , 2009, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[10]  Jong-Kyu Park,et al.  The systematic design and fabrication of a three-chopstick microgripper , 2005 .

[11]  Tomohito Takubo,et al.  Vision-Based Automated Single-Cell Loading and Supply System , 2009, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[12]  Tatsuo Arai,et al.  Micro-manipulation system with a two-fingered micro-hand and its potential application in bioscience. , 2008, Journal of biotechnology.

[13]  F. Hsieh,et al.  Technical aspects of the piezo, laser-assisted, and conventional methods for nuclear transfer of mouse oocytes and their efficiency and efficacy: Piezo minimizes damage of the ooplasmic membrane at injection. , 2004, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Comparative experimental biology.

[14]  Fumihito Arai,et al.  In situ formation of a gel microbead for indirect laser micromanipulation of microorganisms , 2005 .

[15]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Active Release of Microobjects Using a MEMS Microgripper to Overcome Adhesion Forces , 2009, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[16]  Rubén E. Díaz-Rivera,et al.  Electrical characterization of a single cell electroporation biochip with the 2-D scanning vibrating electrode technology , 2009, Biomedical microdevices.

[17]  Nikolai Dechev,et al.  Development of an Autonomous Biological Cell Manipulator With Single-Cell Electroporation and Visual Servoing Capabilities , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  H. Thielecke,et al.  Biopsy on living cells by ultra slow instrument movement , 2006 .

[19]  Koji Ikuta,et al.  Submicron manipulation tools driven by light in a liquid , 2003 .

[20]  Yantao Shen,et al.  An efficient approach of handling and deposition of micro and nano entities using sensorized microfluidic end-effector system , 2008 .

[21]  Kenichi Yoshikawa,et al.  Optical transport of a single cell-sized liposome , 2001 .

[22]  M. Nakajima,et al.  The Effects of Cell Sizes, Environmental Conditions, and Growth Phases on the Strength of Individual W303 Yeast Cells Inside ESEM , 2008, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[23]  Sang Kug Chung,et al.  3-D manipulation of millimeter- and micro-sized objects using an acoustically excited oscillating bubble , 2009 .

[24]  Fumihito Arai,et al.  Synchronized laser micromanipulation of multiple targets along each trajectory by single laser , 2004 .

[25]  Chawin Ounkomol,et al.  Versatile horizontal force probe for mechanical tests on pipette-held cells, particles, and membrane capsules. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[26]  M.C. Wu,et al.  Dynamic Cell and Microparticle Control via Optoelectronic Tweezers , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[27]  B. Nelson,et al.  Monolithically Fabricated Microgripper With Integrated Force Sensor for Manipulating Microobjects and Biological Cells Aligned in an Ultrasonic Field , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.