Detecting Anticipatory Events in Handwriting Movements

We investigated how visual processes exploit specific anticipatory movements observed in handwriting gestures. Previous research has shown that the kinematic information contained in the downstroke of an l is exploited to predict the identity of the forthcoming letter. Here, we determined the moment at which prediction takes place. Two between-letter effects were examined: changes in size (ll vs le) and changes in rotation direction (le vs ln). Results show that with only 75% of the l downstroke trajectory (or 60% of the downstroke time) subjects are already capable of predicting the identity of the letter following the l, that is well before the end of the downstroke. Analysis also reveals that identification takes place after the presentation of the movement acceleration phase. The visual perception of motor anticipation seems to involve the detection of motor events.

[1]  P Viviani,et al.  Perceptual anticipation in handwriting: The role of implicit motor competence , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  G. V. Galen,et al.  On the Simultaneous Processing of Words, Letters and Strokes in Handwriting: Evidence For a Mixed Linear and Parallel Model , 1986 .

[3]  Louis-Jean Boë,et al.  Visual detection of coarticulatory anticipation or...guessing what has not yet been written , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[4]  S. Öhman.  Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements , 1966 .

[5]  Anne D. Hedeman.  Catalogue of Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University, v2 (Book Review) , 1989 .

[6]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spoken word recognition , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Flores B. d'Arcais Giovanni.  Order of strokes writing as a cue for retrieval in reading Chinese characters. , 1994 .

[8]  L. Boë,et al.  Visual perception of motor anticipation in the time course of handwriting , 1995 .

[9]  J. Freyd,et al.  The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Jennifer J. Freyd,et al.  The Effects of Drawing Method on the Discriminability of Characters. , 1991 .

[11]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Approximate Analysis of Variance Test for Normality , 1972 .

[12]  J. Freyd,et al.  Representing the dynamics of a static form , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[13]  P. Viviani,et al.  Trajectory determines movement dynamics , 1982, Neuroscience.

[14]  G. Lorette,et al.  Advances in Handwriting and Drawing: a multidisciplinary approach , 1994 .

[15]  P. Viviani,et al.  The effect of movement velocity on form perception: Geometric illusions in dynamic displays , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[17]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[18]  A. Benguerel,et al.  Coarticulation of Upper Lip Protrusion in French , 1974, Phonetica.

[19]  Lambert Schomaker,et al.  Between-letter context effects in handwriting trajectories , 1986 .

[20]  L J Boë,et al.  Visual Perception of Motor Anticipation in Cursive Handwriting: Influence of Spatial and Movement Information on the Prediction of Forthcoming Letters , 1997, Perception.

[21]  M. Babcock,et al.  Perception of dynamic information in static handwritten forms. , 1988, The American journal of psychology.

[22]  S. Ohman.  Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.