Novel operability-based approach for process design and intensification: Application to a membrane reactor for direct methane aromatization

This article introduces a novel operability-based approach for process design and intensification of energy systems described by nonlinear models. This approach is applied to a membrane reactor (MR) for the direct methane aromatization (DMA) conversion to benzene and hydrogen. The proposed method broadens the scope of the traditional path of the operability approaches for design and control, mainly oriented to obtain the achievable output set (AOS) from the available input set, and compare the computed AOS to a desired output set. In particular, an optimization algorithm based on nonlinear programming tools is formulated for the calculation of the desired input set that is feasible considering process constraints and intensification targets. Results on the application of the operability method as a tool for process intensification show reduction of the DMA-MR footprint (≈77% reactor volume and 80% membrane area reduction) for an equivalent level of performance, when compared to the base case. This case study indicates that the novel approach can be a powerful tool for process intensification of membrane reactors and other complex chemical processes. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 975–983, 2017

[1]  David R. Vinson,et al.  On the operability of continuous processes , 2001 .

[2]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Feasibility analysis of black-box processes using an adaptive sampling Kriging-based method , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[3]  T. Gerven,et al.  Comparison of photocatalytic space-time yields of 12 reactor designs for wastewater treatment , 2015 .

[4]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  A new measure of process output controllability , 1998 .

[5]  C. Georgakis,et al.  On the Calculation of Operability Sets of Nonlinear High-Dimensional Processes , 2010 .

[6]  Andreas A. Linninger,et al.  Integrated design and control under uncertainty: Embedded control optimization for plantwide processes , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[7]  Babatunde A. Ogunnaike,et al.  Integrating systems design and control using dynamic flexibility analysis , 2007 .

[8]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Optimization and Control of Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes Under Uncertainty , 2013 .

[9]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Computational Approaches for Studying the Granular Dynamics of Continuous Blending Processes, 2 – Population Balance and Data‐Based Methods , 2012 .

[10]  Luis F. Domínguez,et al.  A quadratic approximation‐based algorithm for the solution of multiparametric mixed‐integer nonlinear programming problems , 2013 .

[11]  Andreas A. Linninger,et al.  Embedded Control for Optimizing Flexible Dynamic Process Performance , 2011 .

[12]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Design Space of Pharmaceutical Processes Using Data-Driven-Based Methods , 2010, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

[13]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Global optimization of a MINLP process synthesis model for thermochemical based conversion of hybrid coal, biomass, and natural gas to liquid fuels , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[14]  E. Wachsman,et al.  Hydrogen permeation through thin supported SrCe0.7Zr0.2Eu0.1O3−δ membranes; dependence of flux on defect equilibria and operating conditions , 2011 .

[15]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Test Problem Construction for Single-Objective Bilevel Optimization , 2014, Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  E. Drioli,et al.  Process Intensification by Membrane Reactors: High‐Temperature Water Gas Shift Reaction as Single Stage for Syngas Upgrading , 2012 .

[17]  On the attainable region for process networks , 2014 .

[18]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Design of output constraints for model-based non-square controllers using interval operability , 2008 .

[19]  Richard C. Baliban,et al.  Toward Novel Hybrid Biomass, Coal, and Natural Gas Processes for Satisfying Current Transportation Fuel Demands, 2: Simultaneous Heat and Power Integration , 2010 .

[20]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Novel Natural Gas to Liquids Processes: Process Synthesis and Global Optimization Strategies , 2013 .

[21]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Similarities and Differences Between the Concepts of Operability and Flexibility: The Steady-State Case , 2009 .

[22]  Jie Bao,et al.  Operability analysis of nonlinear processes based on incremental dissipativity , 2012 .

[23]  Richard C. Baliban,et al.  Toward Novel Hybrid Biomass, Coal, and Natural Gas Processes for Satisfying Current Transportation Fuel Demands, 1: Process Alternatives, Gasification Modeling, Process Simulation, and Economic Analysis , 2010 .

[24]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Membrane engineering in process intensificationAn overview , 2011 .

[25]  S. Ranil Wickramasinghe,et al.  Process intensification with selected membrane processes , 2015 .

[26]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Input–output operability of control systems: The steady-state case , 2010 .

[27]  Michael Baldea,et al.  From process integration to process intensification , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[28]  Jie Bao,et al.  Plantwide operability assessment for nonlinear processes using a microscopic level network analysis , 2012 .

[29]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Operability‐based determination of feasible control constraints for several high‐dimensional nonsquare industrial processes , 2010 .

[30]  E. Iglesia,et al.  Design and optimization of catalysts and membrane reactors for the non-oxidative conversion of methane , 2002 .