Pamiparib in combination with tislelizumab in patients with advanced solid tumours: results from the dose-escalation stage of a multicentre, open-label, phase 1a/b trial.

BACKGROUND Rationale exists for combined treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in a variety of solid tumours. This study aimed to investigate the safety and antitumour effects of pamiparib, an oral PARP 1/2 inhibitor, combined with tislelizumab, a humanised anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumours and to determine the optimum doses for further evaluation. METHODS We did a multicentre, open-label, phase 1a/b study at five academic sites or community oncology centres in Australia. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced solid tumours who had received one or more previous lines of therapy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 1 or less, and a life expectancy of 12 weeks or more. Patients were enrolled into one of five dose-escalation cohorts, with dose-escalation done in a 3 + 3 design. Cohorts 1-3 received intravenous tislelizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus 20, 40, or 60 mg oral pamiparib twice daily, respectively; cohorts 4 and 5 received 200 mg intravenous tislelizumab every 3 weeks plus 40 or 60 mg oral pamiparib twice daily, respectively. The primary endpoints of the phase 1a dose-escalation part of the study were safety and tolerability, including the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities and determination of the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. All primary endpoints were analysed in the safety analysis set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of tislelizumab or pamiparib, with the exception of the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities, which was analysed in the dose-limiting toxicity analysis set, which included all patients who received at least 90% of the first scheduled tislelizumab dose and at least 75% of scheduled pamiparib doses, or who had a dose-limiting toxicity event during cycle 1. Reported here are results of the phase 1a dose-escalation stage of the trial. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02660034, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between Jan 22, 2016, and May 16, 2017, we enrolled 49 patients (median age 63 years [IQR 55-67]), all of whom received at least one dose of pamiparib or tiselzumab. Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities (intractable grade 2 nausea [n=1] and grade 3 rash [n=1] in cohort 4, and grade 2 nausea and vomiting [n=1] and grade 4 immune-mediated hepatitis [n=1] in cohort 5). The recommended phase 2 dose was tislelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus pamiparib 40 mg twice daily (the dose given in cohort 4). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (in 31 [63%] of 49 patients), fatigue (26 [53%]), diarrhoea (17 [35%]), and vomiting (15 [31%]). 23 (47%) of 49 patients had immune-related adverse events, of whom nine (39%) had asymptomatic grade 3-4 hepatic immune-related adverse events, which were reversible with corticosteroid treatment. The most common adverse event of grade 3 or worse severity was anaemia (in six [12%] patients) and no grade 5 adverse events were reported. Hepatitis or autoimmune hepatitis was the only serious adverse event to occur in two or more patients (in four [8%] patients). At a median follow-up of 8·3 months (IQR 4·8-12·8), ten (20%) of 49 patients achieved an objective response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, including two complete responses and eight partial responses. INTERPRETATION Pamiparib with tislelizumab was generally well tolerated and associated with antitumour responses and clinical benefit in patients with advanced solid tumours supporting further investigation of the combination of pamiparib with tislelizumab. FUNDING BeiGene.

[1]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  DNA Repair Deficiency and Immunotherapy Response. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Chen,et al.  Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin With or Without Veliparib in Patients With Pancreas Adenocarcinoma and a Germline BRCA/PALB2 Mutation. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  K. Kerr,et al.  Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  Xiaomin Song,et al.  The binding of an anti-PD-1 antibody to FcγRΙ has a profound impact on its biological functions , 2018, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[5]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[6]  R. Garje,et al.  Therapeutic Potential of Combining PARP Inhibitor and Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[7]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Incidence and risk of hepatic toxicities with PD-1 inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis , 2016, Drug design, development and therapy.

[8]  A. Cerwenka,et al.  NKG2D ligands in tumor immunity , 2008, Oncogene.

[9]  Xiaomin Song,et al.  Abstract 2226: Anti-human PD-1 antibody BGB-A317 exhibits potent immune cell activation , 2016 .

[10]  James X. Sun,et al.  Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[11]  M. Atkins,et al.  Toxicities of Immunotherapy for the Practitioner. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  P. Hayashi Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network Causality Assessment: Criteria and Experience in the United States , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[13]  S. Keam,et al.  Tislelizumab: First Approval , 2020, Drugs.

[14]  B. Jiang,et al.  Abstract 1653: BGB-290: A highly potent and specific PARP1/2 inhibitor potentiates anti-tumor activity of chemotherapeutics in patient biopsy derived SCLC models , 2015 .

[15]  E. Plimack,et al.  Nivolumab (anti-PD-1; BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). , 2014 .

[16]  M. Millward,et al.  A phase I dose-escalation study of BGB-290, a novel PARP1/2 selective inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors. , 2016 .

[17]  S. Gasser,et al.  The DNA damage response, immunity and cancer. , 2006, Seminars in cancer biology.

[18]  B. Jiang,et al.  Abstract 1651: BGB-290, a novel PARP inhibitor with unique brain penetration ability, demonstrated strong synergism with temozolomide in subcutaneous and intracranial xenograft models , 2015 .

[19]  Lauren L. Ritterhouse,et al.  Association and prognostic significance of BRCA1/2-mutation status with neoantigen load, number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in high grade serous ovarian cancer , 2016, Oncotarget.

[20]  J. Desai,et al.  387PPreliminary results from subsets of patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer (GC) and esophageal carcinoma (EC) in a dose-escalation/expansion study of BGB-A317, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) , 2017 .

[21]  M. Parmar,et al.  Definitions for Response and Progression in Ovarian Cancer Clinical Trials Incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 Agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) , 2010, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[22]  Martin L. Miller,et al.  Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non–small cell lung cancer , 2015, Science.

[23]  Michael S. Goldberg,et al.  The PARP1 inhibitor BMN 673 exhibits immunoregulatory effects in a Brca1(-/-) murine model of ovarian cancer. , 2015, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[24]  Amy M Sion,et al.  Immune-related adverse events are linked with improved progression-free survival in patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. , 2018, Seminars in oncology.

[25]  C. Lefebvre,et al.  Mutational Landscape and Sensitivity to Immune Checkpoint Blockers , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  L. Fu,et al.  PD-1/PD-L1 Based Combinational Cancer Therapy: Icing on the Cake , 2020, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[27]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  PARP Inhibitor Upregulates PD-L1 Expression and Enhances Cancer-Associated Immunosuppression , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  Susan Halabi,et al.  Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.