Examining the Psychological Process Underlying the Sleeper Effect: The Elaboration Likelihood Model Explanation
暂无分享,去创建一个
Leandre R. Fabrigar | Duane T. Wegener | Richard E. Petty | R. Petty | D. Wegener | L. Fabrigar | J. Priester | Joseph R. Priester
[1] R. Petty,et al. Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny , 1995 .
[2] Richard E. Petty,et al. Majority and minority influence : source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny , 1994 .
[3] Duane T. Wegener,et al. The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction , 1997 .
[4] J. Priester,et al. Artifact or Meaningful Theoretical Constructs?: Examining Evidence for Nonbelief- and Belief-Based Attitude Change Processes , 1997 .
[5] C. F. Kao,et al. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.
[6] J. Cacioppo,et al. Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .
[7] H. Rao Unnava,et al. Self-Referencing , 1989 .
[8] J. Cacioppo,et al. The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .
[9] A. Greenwald,et al. Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to rest , 1974 .
[10] C. I. Hovland,et al. Reinstatement of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[11] L. Thurstone. Attitudes Can Be Measured , 1928, American Journal of Sociology.
[12] S. Chaiken,et al. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[13] Duane T. Wegener,et al. The Metacognition of Bias Correction: Naive Theories of Bias and the Flexible Correction Model , 1998 .
[14] Thomas D. Cook,et al. History of the sleeper effect: Some logical pitfalls in accepting the null hypothesis. , 1979 .
[15] A. A. Lumsdaine,et al. Experiments On Mass Communication , 1949 .
[16] C. I. Hovland,et al. The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .
[17] C. F. Kao,et al. Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. , 1986 .
[18] T. Cook,et al. Empirical tests of the absolute sleeper effect predicted from the discounting cue hypothesis , 1978 .
[19] J. Cacioppo,et al. DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .
[20] Thomas D. Cook,et al. The Persistence of Experimentally Induced Attitude Change , 1978 .
[21] J. Cacioppo,et al. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .
[22] Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al. Message Order Effects in Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Perspective , 1994 .
[23] J. Cacioppo,et al. The need for cognition. , 1982 .
[24] J. Cacioppo,et al. Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. , 1994 .
[25] T. Cook,et al. Equity theory and the cognitive ability of children. , 1979 .