Group and individual level variations between symmetric and asymmetric DLPFC montages for tDCS over large scale brain network nodes

Two challenges to optimizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are selecting between, often similar, electrode montages and accounting for inter-individual differences in response. These two factors are related by how tDCS montage determines current flow through the brain considered across or within individuals. MRI-based computational head models (CHMs) predict how brain anatomy determine electric field (EF) patterns for a given tDCS montage. Because conventional tDCS produces diffuse brain current flow, stimulation outcomes may be understood as modulation of global networks. Therefore, we developed network-led, rather than region-led, approach. We specifically considered two common frontal tDCS montages that nominally target the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; asymmetric unilateral (anode/cathode: F4/Fp1) and symmetric bilateral (F4/F3) electrode montages. CHMs of 66 participants were constructed. We showed that cathode location significantly affects EFs in the limbic network. Furthermore, using a finer parcellation of large-scale networks, we found significant differences in some of main nodes within a network, even if there is no difference at the network level. This study generally demonstrates a methodology for considering the components of large-scale networks in CHMs instead of targeting a single region and specifically provides insight into how symmetric vs asymmetric frontal tDCS may differentially modulate networks across a population.

[1]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Induction of Late LTP-Like Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex by Repeated Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[3]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  TMS Motor Thresholds Correlate With TDCS Electric Field Strengths in Hand Motor Area , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[4]  Peng Wen,et al.  The value and cost of complexity in predictive modelling: role of tissue anisotropic conductivity and fibre tracts in neuromodulation , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  Multifocal tDCS targeting the resting state motor network increases cortical excitability beyond traditional tDCS targeting unilateral motor cortex , 2017, NeuroImage.

[6]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  A. Brunoni,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Samples: Influence of Stimulation Parameters , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[8]  J. Tiihonen,et al.  Amygdala-orbitofrontal structural and functional connectivity in females with anxiety disorders, with and without a history of conduct disorder , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Angel V. Peterchev,et al.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature , 2019, Brain Stimulation.

[10]  N Accornero,et al.  Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp , 1998, Neuroreport.

[11]  L. Parra,et al.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[13]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Distributed and causal influence of frontal operculum in task control , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2013, NeuroImage.

[16]  Colleen K. Loo,et al.  Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  Julie M. Baker,et al.  Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient , 2011, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  M. Nitsche,et al.  A framework for categorizing electrode montages in transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[19]  Tae-Seong Kim,et al.  Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  M. Welsh,et al.  The Development of Hot and Cool Executive Functions in Childhood and Adolescence: Are We Getting Warmer? , 2014 .

[21]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS , 2013, NeuroImage.

[22]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex From Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI , 2017, bioRxiv.

[23]  Gregg H. Recanzone,et al.  Transcranial electrical stimulation , 2017, Current Biology.

[24]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Interaction of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (l-DLPFC) and Right Orbitofrontal Cortex (OFC) in Hot and Cold Executive Functions: Evidence from Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) , 2018, Neuroscience.

[25]  K. Jakobsen,et al.  Three chromosomal rearrangements promote genomic divergence between migratory and stationary ecotypes of Atlantic cod , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[27]  T. Flaisch,et al.  Electrical Brain Stimulation Improves Cognitive Performance by Modulating Functional Connectivity and Task-Specific Activation , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  A. Thielscher,et al.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A modeling study. , 2018, Journal of affective disorders.

[29]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  Mahima Sharma,et al.  Direct current stimulation boosts hebbian plasticity in vitro , 2019, Brain Stimulation.

[31]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[32]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation alters activation and connectivity in cortical and subcortical reward systems: A tDCS‐fMRI study , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[33]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Intrinsic Architecture Underlying the Relations among the Default, Dorsal Attention, and Frontoparietal Control Networks of the Human Brain , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of large-scale brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation evidenced by resting-state functional MRI , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[35]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[36]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial electric stimulation , 2018, NeuroImage.

[37]  Kay Jann,et al.  In-vivo Imaging of Magnetic Fields Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Human Brain using MRI , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Lucia M. Li,et al.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies , 2015, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[39]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[40]  Adam J. Woods,et al.  Dosage Considerations for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children: A Computational Modeling Study , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  L. Parra,et al.  Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  A. David,et al.  The effects of prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on food craving and temporal discounting in women with frequent food cravings , 2014, Appetite.

[43]  L. Parra,et al.  Inter-Individual Variation during Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Normalization of Dose Using MRI-Derived Computational Models , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[44]  Megan A. Boudewyn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation , 2019, Molecular Psychiatry.

[45]  M. Bikson,et al.  Computational Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2012, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[46]  Marom Bikson,et al.  Direct current stimulation of endothelial monolayers induces a transient and reversible increase in transport due to the electroosmotic effect , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[47]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[48]  H. Möller,et al.  Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Bikson,et al.  Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: Role of “return” electrode’s position and size , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[50]  Mark S. George,et al.  Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Threshold Combined with Reverse-Calculated Electric Field Modeling Can Determine Individualized tDCS Dosage , 2019, bioRxiv.

[51]  Mark S. George,et al.  Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling , 2020, Brain Stimulation.

[52]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes , 2018, Brain Stimulation.

[53]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[54]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Group-level and functional-region analysis of electric-field shape during cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation with different electrode montages , 2019, Journal of neural engineering.

[55]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Transcranial DC stimulation modifies functional connectivity of large‐scale brain networks in abstinent methamphetamine users , 2018, Brain and behavior.

[56]  A. T. Sack,et al.  Multimodal transcranial magnetic stimulation: Using concurrent neuroimaging to reveal the neural network dynamics of noninvasive brain stimulation , 2011, Progress in Neurobiology.

[57]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields , 2020, Brain Stimulation.

[58]  Socrates Dokos,et al.  A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression , 2014, NeuroImage.

[59]  Heidi M. Schambra,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation Promotes BDNF-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: Potential Implications for Motor Learning , 2010, Neuron.

[60]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  A. Hirata,et al.  Significant group-level hotspots found in deep brain regions during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A computational analysis of electric fields , 2019, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[62]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[63]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  Integrating electric field modeling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects , 2019, Nature Communications.

[64]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Methodology for tDCS integration with fMRI , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[65]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Activation of Prefrontal Cortex by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Appetite for Risk during Ambiguous Decision Making , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  R. Lindenberg,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment: Behavioral effects and neural mechanisms , 2015, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[67]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[68]  John R. Fedota,et al.  Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead , 2019, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[69]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.