Understanding reflexive systems of innovation: An analysis of Swedish nanotechnology discourse and organization

Abstract We seek to understand how nanotechnology can contribute to the development of a more sustainable society in general, and to investigate Swedish nanotechnology in particular. On the one hand, the research interest is on how nanoscience can be turned into used products, that is, innovation. On the other hand, we acknowledge that innovation itself is the main producer of risk in modern societies. Inspired by sociology and economics of innovation, we try to capture this by introducing the term ‘reflexive system of innovation’ to denote a system made up of heterogenous elements, such as discursive components (expressions of knowledge and normative and regulative stands) and organizational components (actors and knowledge), evolving in a non-linear way through external influences as well as self re-enforcing and self-regulating processes. We present the evolution of a Swedish nanotechnology system from the 1980s to the present, as it moves through phases characterized by different kinds of discourse and organization. Evaluating the Swedish case against the concept of a reflexive system of innovation, we find advanced academic knowledge production but a lack of interconnectivity between actors, few actors outside the research community entering the system and a weak function of anticipation, guidance and risk handling. Broad national nanotechnology initiatives (NNIs) may be important for the crystallization of the desired processes, but because neither innovation nor risk can be fully contained, an NNI may only be part of the input to a fully fledged reflexive system of innovation in nanotechnology.

[1]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Is Re-modernization Occurring - And If So, How to Prove It? , 2003 .

[2]  Werner Rammert Ritardando and accelerando in reflexive innovation, or how networks synchronise the tempi of technological innovation , 2000 .

[3]  Bernward Joerges,et al.  Instrumentation between science, state and industry , 2001 .

[4]  Scott Lash,et al.  Reflexivity as Non-Linearity , 2003 .

[5]  Cynthia Selin Expectations and the Emergence of Nanotechnology , 2007 .

[6]  Sverker Sörlin I den absoluta frontlinjen : En bok om forskningsstiftelserna, konkurrenskraften och politikens möjligheter , 2005 .

[7]  Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent,et al.  Two Cultures of Nanotechnology , 2004 .

[8]  Andrew Webster,et al.  Health technology assessment: a sociological commentary on reflexive innovation , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[9]  B. Latour When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences , 2000 .

[10]  Alison Anderson,et al.  The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press , 2005 .

[11]  R. Kemp,et al.  Governance for Sustainability Through Transition Management , 2003 .

[12]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Technology path assessment for sustainable technology development , 2004 .

[13]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[14]  Otávio Bueno,et al.  The drexler-smalley debate on nanotechnology: Incommensurability at work? , 2004 .

[15]  K. Eric Drexler,et al.  Engines of Creation: the Coming Era of Nanotechnology , 1986 .

[16]  M. Korstanje The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .

[17]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations , 2003, Scientometrics.

[18]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[19]  B. Dalum National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[20]  Hans Weinberger Nätverksentreprenören : en historia om teknisk forskning och industriellt utvecklingsarbete från den Malmska utredningen till Styrelsen för teknisk utveckling , 1997 .

[21]  M. Lynch Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge , 2000 .

[22]  Martin Meyer Nanotechnology in Sweden: Tracking Patenting Activity & Links Between Nanotech Firms and Swedish Science , 2006 .

[23]  Tom Quirk,et al.  There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom , 2006, Size Really Does Matter.

[24]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[25]  Hans Glimell Grand Visions and Lilliput Politics: Staging the Exploration of 'the Endless Frontier' , 2004 .

[26]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[27]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Advances in social theory and methodology : toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies , 1981 .

[28]  J. R. Griffin,et al.  The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America , 2000 .

[29]  R. Feynman There's plenty of room at the bottom , 1999 .

[30]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[31]  T. P. Hughes The Seamless Web: Technology, Science, Etcetera, Etcetera , 1986 .