Simulation analysis to test the influence of model adequacy and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters for traits with direct and maternal effects

Simulations were used to study the influence of model adequacy and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters for traits governed by direct and maternal effects. To test model adequacy, several data sets were simulated according to different underlying genetic assumptions and analysed by comparing the correct and incorrect models. Results showed that omission of one of the random effects leads to an incorrect decomposition of the other components. If maternal genetic effects exist but are neglected, direct heritability is overestimated, and sometimes more than double. The bias depends on the value of the genetic correlation between direct and maternal effects. To study the influence of data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters, several populations were simulated, with different degrees of known paternity and different levels of genetic connectedness between flocks. Results showed that the lack of connectedness affects estimates when flocks have different genetic means because no distinction can be made between genetic and environmental differences between flocks. In this case, direct and maternal heritabilities are under-estimated, whereas maternal environmental effects are overestimated. The insufficiency of pedigree leads to biased estimates of genetic parameters.

[1]  D. Boichard,et al.  Connectedness in the French Holstein cattle population , 1999, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[2]  J. Foulley,et al.  Méthode de prise en compte de la consanguinité dans un modèle simple de simulation de performances , 1981, Annales de génétique et de sélection animale.

[3]  A. Neumaier,et al.  Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models , 1998, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[4]  J. Wilton,et al.  Effects of data structure on variance of prediction error and accuracy of genetic evaluation. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[5]  C. Morris,et al.  Maternal effects for growth traits in beef cattle , 1993 .

[6]  F. Ménissier.  Comments on optimization of cattle breeding schemes: beef breeds for suckling herds. A review , 1976, Annales de génétique et de sélection animale.

[7]  E. J. Pollak,et al.  Relationship between sire x year interactions and direct-maternal genetic correlation for weaning weight of Simmental cattle. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[8]  R. Fernando,et al.  Estimates of dispersion parameters and of genetic and environmental trends for weaning weight in Angus cattle using a maternal animal model with genetic grouping , 1993 .

[9]  ROLE OF MATERNAL EFFECTS IN ANIMAL BREEDING , 2022 .

[10]  R. Cantet,et al.  Direct and maternal variances and covariances and maternal phenotypic effects on preweaning growth of beef cattle. , 1988, Journal of animal science.

[11]  J. Foulley,et al.  Méthodes d'estimation des effets directs et maternels en sélection animale , 1978, Annales de génétique et de sélection animale.

[12]  R. Alenda,et al.  Selection response for growth in a Spanish Merino flock. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[13]  D. Boichard,et al.  A simulation study of the effect of connectedness on genetic trend , 1996, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[14]  K. Meyer.  Bias and sampling covariances of estimates of variance components due to maternal effects , 1992, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[15]  B. Kennedy,et al.  Considerations on genetic connectedness between management units under an animal model. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[16]  A. Muñoz-serrano,et al.  Simulation analysis with BLUP methodology of different data structures in goat selection schemes in Spain , 1995 .

[17]  Daniel Gianola,et al.  Advances in Statistical Methods for Genetic Improvement of Livestock , 1990, Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences.

[18]  D. L. Robinson.  Models which might explain negative correlations between direct and maternal genetic effects , 1996 .

[19]  W. Hohenboken.  Relationships between direct and maternal effects on growth in Herefords. , 1970 .

[20]  N. Fogarty,et al.  Genetic parameters for Australian maternal and dual-purpose meatsheep breeds. III: Liveweight, fat depth and wool production in coopworth sheep , 1994 .

[21]  L. D. Vleck,et al.  A note on heritability estimates for growth traits in male and female Romanov sheep , 1993 .

[22]  C. Perrot,et al.  L'élevage traditionnel des petits ruminants au Sénégal. II. Pratiques de conduite et d'exploitation des animaux chez les éleveurs de la région de Louga , 1990 .

[23]  Baker Rl.  The role of maternal effects on the efficiency of selection in beef cattle - A review , 1980 .

[24]  R. M. Koch.  The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. VI. Maternal effects in beef cattle. , 1972, Journal of animal science.

[25]  R. Roehe,et al.  The influence of maternal effects on accuracy of evaluation of litter size in swine. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[26]  J. Werf.  Advances in statistical methods for genetic improvement of livestock , 1991 .

[27]  B. Kennedy,et al.  Potential Errors in Sire Evaluation from Regional Genetic Differences , 1980 .

[28]  K. Meyer.  Variance components due to direct and maternal effects for growth traits of Australian beef cattle , 1992 .

[29]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations , 1992, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[30]  S. Gerstmayr.  Impact of the data structure on the reliability of the estimated genetic parameters in an animal model with maternal effects , 1992 .

[31]  Genetic Relationships and Linear Model Comparisons Between United States and Canadian Ayrshire and Jersey Bull Populations , 1991 .

[32]  R. Thompson,et al.  Models to estimate maternal effects for juvenile body weight in broiler chickens , 1997, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[33]  J. Foulley,et al.  Connectedness in Genetic Evaluation , 1990 .

[34]  A. Näsholm,et al.  Genetic relationships of lamb weight, maternal ability, and mature ewe weight in Swedish finewool sheep. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[35]  K. Meyer,et al.  Estimation of additive maternal and cytoplasmic genetic variances in animal models. , 1989, Journal of dairy science.