Non-turing stripes and spots: a novel mechanism for biological cell clustering

A classical model for developmental patterning invokes a chemical ‘prepattern’ which cells read out as developmental instructions. The ‘prepattern’ arises from the Turing Instability of two reacting and diffusing chemicals, an ‘activator’ and an ‘inhibitor.’ We propose a novel developmental mechanism, based on cell–cell adhesion and cell–extracellular matrix (ECM) adhesion, which depends only on biological mechanisms and chemicals shown experimentally to be significant during patterning. In our model, condensation results from random cell diffusion biased by preferential attachment of cells to ECM and enhanced local cell–cell adhesion. We implement a two-dimensional Cellular Potts Model (CPM) simulation of condensation to explore this mechanism and discuss the parameter dependencies of the patterns. The simulation reproduces much of the density-dependent phenomenology of in vitro biological cell clustering during the developmental process of chick limb precartilage mesenchymal condensation. We study pattern formation in our model and compare it to the standard Turing mechanism. The mechanism should apply to other condensation processes besides limb chondrogenesis in vivo. The existance of an overlooked and simple mechanism which explains the observed phenomenology better than the classical picture is genuinely surprising.

[1]  Arpita Upadhyaya,et al.  Thermodynamic and fluid properties of cells, tissues and membranes , 2000 .

[2]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Cell‐cell adhesion in limb‐formation, estimated from photographs of cell sorting experiments based on a spatial stochastic model , 1998, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[3]  Clifford J. Tabin,et al.  A re-examination of proximodistal patterning during vertebrate limb development , 2002, Nature.

[4]  A. M. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[5]  Stuart A Newman,et al.  Ectodermal FGFs induce perinodular inhibition of limb chondrogenesis in vitro and in vivo via FGF receptor 2. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[6]  H L Frisch,et al.  Dynamics of skeletal pattern formation in developing chick limb. , 1979, Science.

[7]  H. Ide,et al.  Role of chondrogenic tissue in programmed cell death and BMP expression in chick limb buds. , 2000, The International journal of developmental biology.

[8]  K. Hara,et al.  Cell adhesiveness and affinity for limb pattern formation. , 2002, The International journal of developmental biology.

[9]  Lewis Wolpert,et al.  Principles of Development , 1997 .

[10]  S A Newman,et al.  Morphogenetic differences between fore and hind limb precartilage mesenchyme: relation to mechanisms of skeletal pattern formation. , 1994, Developmental biology.

[11]  C. Chuong,et al.  Adhesion molecules in skeletogenesis: II. Neural cell adhesion molecules mediate precartilaginous mesenchymal condensations and enhance chondrogenesis , 1993, Journal of cellular physiology.

[12]  R. Hynes,et al.  Defects in mesoderm, neural tube and vascular development in mouse embryos lacking fibronectin. , 1993, Development.

[13]  S. Bryant,et al.  Cell cycle length affects gene expression and pattern formation in limbs. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[14]  R. Tuan,et al.  Expression and functional involvement of N-cadherin in embryonic limb chondrogenesis. , 1994, Development.

[15]  Stuart A. Newman,et al.  Role of transforming growth factor-β in chondrogenic pattern formation in the embryonic limb: Stimulation of mesenchymal condensation and fibronectin gene expression by exogenenous TGF-β and evidence for endogenous TGF-β-like activity , 1991 .

[16]  C. Tabin,et al.  Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. , 1996, Development.

[17]  Glazier,et al.  Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[18]  José C. M. Mombach,et al.  Quantitative comparison between differential adhesion models and cell sorting in the presence and absence of fluctuations. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[19]  N. Rashevsky,et al.  Mathematical biology , 1961, Connecticut medicine.

[20]  Jean-Loup Duband,et al.  Cross Talk between Adhesion Molecules: Control of N-cadherin Activity by Intracellular Signals Elicited by β1 and β3 Integrins in Migrating Neural Crest Cells , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  J. Thiery,et al.  Differential Function of N-Cadherin and Cadherin-7 in the Control of Embryonic Cell Motility , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  B. Hall,et al.  All for one and one for all: condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[23]  H. Iba,et al.  Misexpression of Hoxa-13 induces cartilage homeotic transformation and changes cell adhesiveness in chick limb buds. , 1995, Genes & development.

[24]  S. Kondo,et al.  A reaction–diffusion wave on the skin of the marine angelfish Pomacanthus , 1995, Nature.

[25]  K. Shiota,et al.  TGFβ2 acts as an “Activator” molecule in reaction‐diffusion model and is involved in cell sorting phenomenon in mouse limb micromass culture , 2000, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[26]  L. Wolpert Developmental Biology , 1968, Nature.

[27]  Dulos,et al.  Experimental evidence of a sustained standing Turing-type nonequilibrium chemical pattern. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[28]  K. Muneoka,et al.  Cell migration and chick limb development: chemotactic action of FGF-4 and the AER. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[29]  S A Newman,et al.  Sticky fingers: Hox genes and cell adhesion in vertebrate limb development. , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[30]  S A Newman,et al.  Role of transforming growth factor-beta in chondrogenic pattern formation in the embryonic limb: stimulation of mesenchymal condensation and fibronectin gene expression by exogenenous TGF-beta and evidence for endogenous TGF-beta-like activity. , 1991, Developmental biology.

[31]  K. Shiota,et al.  Extracellular matrix environment influences chondrogenic pattern formation in limb bud micromass culture: Experimental verification of theoretical models , 2000, The Anatomical record.

[32]  W. Kulyk,et al.  Fibronectin gene expression during limb cartilage differentiation. , 1989, Development.

[33]  Glazier,et al.  Simulation of the differential adhesion driven rearrangement of biological cells. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.