Evaluating a Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Decision Support in Water Resources Management

In this paper we describe a framework for multicriteria modeling and support of multi-stakeholder decision processes. We report on its testing in the development of a new water level management policy for a regulated lake-river system in Finland. In the framework the stakeholders are involved in the decision process from the problem structuring stage to the group consensus seeking stage followed by a stage of seeking public acceptance for the policy. The framework aims at creating an evolutionary learning process. In this paper we also focus on the use of a new interactive method for finding and identifying Pareto-optimal alternatives. Role playing experiments with students are used to test the practical applicability of a negotiation support procedure called the method of improving directions. We also describe the preference programming approach for the aggregation of the stakeholder opinions in the final evaluation of alternatives and consensus seeking.

[1]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  An interactive multicriteria decision model for multipurpose reservoir management: the Shellmouth Reservoir , 1998 .

[2]  R P Hämäläinen,et al.  Multiattribute Risk Analysis in Nuclear Emergency Management , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Searching for joint gains in multi-party negotiations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Hans Vrolijk,et al.  Behavioral and procedural consequences of structural variation in value trees , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Systematic Policy Development to Ensure Compliance to Environmental Regulations , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[6]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Interactive spreadsheet modelling of regulation strategies for a lake-river system , 1998 .

[7]  Tung Bui,et al.  Negotiation processes, Evolutionary Systems Design, and NEGOTIATOR , 1996 .

[8]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Spontaneous decision conferencing with top-level politicians , 1996 .

[9]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Spontaneous Decision Conferencing in Parliamentary Negotiations , 2004 .

[10]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Advances in Negotiation Science , 1994 .

[11]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  On-line group decision support by HIPRE 3+ Group Link , 1994 .

[12]  HA RAIMOP..  A Dynamic Interval Goal Programming Approach to the Regulation of a Lake – River System , 2001 .

[13]  S. Zionts,et al.  Generating Pareto Solutions in a Two-Party Setting: Constraint Proposal Methods , 1999 .

[14]  R. P. Hiimiiliiinen,et al.  Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment , 1995 .

[15]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen.  Computer Assisted Energy Policy Analysis in the Parliament of Finland , 1988 .

[16]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Rational agents, contract curves, and inefficient compromises , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[17]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ratio Statements , 1992, Oper. Res..

[18]  L. Duckstein,et al.  A multiobjective decision support system for multiresource forest management , 1998 .

[19]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  On-line group decision support by preference programming in traffic planning , 1996 .

[20]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  There Is Hope In Attribute Weighting , 2000 .

[21]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  How to select fair improving directions in a negotiation model over continuous issues , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[22]  R.P. Hamalainen,et al.  Observations about consensus seeking in a multiple criteria environment , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  詳子 斎藤,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking の拡張とその応用 , 2003 .

[24]  J. Cohon.  Multiobjective optimization in water resources systems , 1976 .

[25]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[26]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Notes on the weighting biases in value trees , 1998 .

[27]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Regulation of Lake Päijänne - a learning process preceding decision-making , 1999 .

[28]  M. Shakun.  Modeling and supporting task-oriented group processes: Purposeful complex adaptive systems and Evolutionary Systems Design , 1996 .

[29]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Constraint proposal method for computing Pareto solutions in multi-party negotiations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  WEB-HIPRE - A JAVA APPLET FOR AHP AND VALUE TREE ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[31]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Interactive decision aiding for group decision support , 1995 .

[32]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Supporting International Negotiation with a WWW-Based System , 1997 .

[33]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  The decision support system GMCR in environment conflict management , 1997 .

[34]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons , 1995 .

[36]  David L. Olson,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making Models in Group Decision Support , 1993 .

[37]  Simon French,et al.  Problem formulation for multi-criteria decision analysis: Report of a workshop , 1998 .

[38]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Multiple criteria water supply planning , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[39]  Liem T. Tran,et al.  Multicriterion decision support for a conflict over stream diversion and land-water reallocation in Hawaii , 1997 .

[40]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..