NNERVE: Neural Network Extraction of Repetitive Vectors for Electromyography. I. Algorithm

Artificial neural network (ANN) based signal processing methods have been shown to have significant robustness in processing complex, degraded, noisy, and unstable signals. A novel approach to automated electromyogram (EMG) signal decomposition, using an ANN processing architecture, is presented here. Due to the lack of a priori knowledge of motor unit action potential (MUAP) morphology, the EMG decomposition must be performed in an unsupervised manner. An ANN classifier, consisting of a multilayer perceptron neural network and employing a novel unsupervised training strategy, is proposed. The ANN learns repetitive appearances of MUAP waveforms from their suspected occurrences in a filtered EMG signal in an autoassociative learning task. The same training waveforms are fed into the trained ANN and the output of the ANN is fed back to its input, giving rise to a dynamic retrieval net classifier. For each waveform in the data, the network discovers a feature vector associated with that waveform. For each waveform, classification is achieved by comparing its feature vector with those of the other waveforms. Firing information of each MUAP is further used to refine the classification results of the ANN classifier. Then, individual MUAP waveform shapes are derived and their firing tables are created.<<ETX>>

[1]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Art 2: Self-Organization Of Stable Category Recognition Codes For Analog Input Patterns , 1988, Other Conferences.

[2]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  An introduction to neural computing , 1988, Neural Networks.

[3]  J. Petajan,et al.  AAEM minimonograph #3: Motor unit recruitment , 1991, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[5]  F. Buchthal Electromyography in the evaluation of muscle diseases. , 1985, Neurologic clinics.

[6]  Ronald S. Lefever,et al.  A Procedure for Decomposing the Myoelectric Signal Into Its Constituent Action Potentials-Part II: Execution and Test for Accuracy , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Automatic Decomposition of the Clinical Electromyogram , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  F Buchthal,et al.  Diagnostic yield of analysis of the pattern of electrical activity and of individual motor unit potentials in myopathy. , 1976, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their physiological determinants. , 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[10]  Richard P. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987 .

[11]  M H Hassoun,et al.  Quantitative computer analysis of the sounds of isolated motor unit action potentials , 1992, Neurology.

[12]  D B Sanders,et al.  AAEE Minimonograph #25: Single‐fiber electromyography in myasthenia gravis , 1986, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  Shiro Usui,et al.  Digital Low-Pass Differentiation for Biological Signal Processing , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  W Wolf,et al.  Discharge pattern of single motor units in basal ganglia disorders , 1986, Neurology.

[15]  F Bruyninckx,et al.  Motor unit synchronization in physiologic, enhanced physiologic, and voluntary tremor in man , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[16]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for Measurement , 1986, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[17]  L J Dorfman,et al.  AAEE minimonograph #29: Automatic quantitative electromyography , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  James A. Anderson,et al.  Radar signal categorization using a neural network , 1990, Proc. IEEE.

[19]  Bruno Mambrito,et al.  Acquisition and Decomposition of the EMG Signal , 1983 .

[20]  Ronald S. Lefever,et al.  A Procedure for Decomposing the Myoelectric Signal Into Its Constituent Action Potentials - Part I: Technique, Theory, and Implementation , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  A. R. Spitzer,et al.  Signal Decompostion and Diagnostic Classification of the Electromyogram Using a Novel Neural Network Technique. , 1990 .

[22]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Quantitative EMG in inflammatory myopathy , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[23]  F Buchthal,et al.  Diagnostic yield of the analysis of the pattern of electrical activity of muscle and of individual motor unit potentials in neurogenic involvement. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[24]  James A. Reggia,et al.  Self-processing networks and their biomedical implications , 1988, Proc. IEEE.

[25]  W. Trojaborg,et al.  Quantitative electromyography in polymyositis: A reappraisal , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[26]  M.H. Hassoun,et al.  NNERVE: Neural Network Extraction of Repetitive Vectors for Electromyography. II. Performance analysis , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Mark J. Brown Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle: Principles and practice, Ed by Fun Kimura, MD, Philadelphia, F.A. Davis, 1989,709 pp, illustrated, $85.00 , 1990 .

[28]  E Stålberg,et al.  Automatic analysis of the EMG interference pattern. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  Computerized analysis of motor unit firing , 1983 .