Automated body condition scoring of dairy cows using 3-dimensional feature extraction from multiple body regions.

Machine vision technology has been used in automated body condition score (BCS) classification of dairy cows. The current vision-based classifications use information acquired from a limited number of body regions of the cow. Our study aimed to improve automated BCS classification by including multiple body condition-related features extracted from 3 viewpoints in 8 body regions. The data set of this study included 44 lactating cows with their BCS evenly distributed over the scale of BCS from 1.5 to 4.5 units. The body images of these cows were recorded over 2 consecutive days using 3-dimensional cameras positioned to view the cow from the top, right side, and rear. Each image was automatically processed to identify anatomical landmarks on the body surface. Around these anatomical landmarks, the bony prominences and body surface depressions were quantified to describe 8 body condition-related features. A manual BCS of each cow was independently assigned by 2 trained assessors using the same predefined protocol. With the extracted features as inputs and manual BCS as the reference, we built a nearest-neighbor classification model to classify BCS and obtained an overall classification sensitivity of 0.72 using a 10-fold cross-validation. We conclude that the sensitivity of automated BCS classification has been improved by expanding the selection of body condition-related features extracted from multiple body regions.

[1]  K. Weigel,et al.  Relationships between body condition score change, prior mid-lactation phenotypic residual feed intake, and hyperketonemia onset in transition dairy cows. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  K. Pierce,et al.  Effect of stocking rate and calving date on dry matter intake, milk production, body weight, and body condition score in spring-calving, grass-fed dairy cows. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Ke Wang,et al.  LSSA_CAU: An interactive 3d point clouds analysis software for body measurement of livestock with similar forms of cows or pigs , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[4]  N. Friggens,et al.  On-farm estimation of energy balance in dairy cows using only frequent body weight measurements and body condition score. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  J R Roche,et al.  Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  G. C. Guarnera,et al.  Objective estimation of body condition score by modeling cow body shape from digital images. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  E. Kristensen,et al.  Within- and across-person uniformity of body condition scoring in Danish Holstein cattle. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  I Halachmi,et al.  Development of an automatic cow body condition scoring using body shape signature and Fourier descriptors. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[10]  J B Kaneene,et al.  Validation of body condition scores with ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat of dairy cows. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  Wolfgang Junge,et al.  A multi-Kinect cow scanning system: Calculating linear traits from manually marked recordings of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows , 2017 .

[12]  Ilan Halachmi,et al.  Automatic assessment of dairy cattle body condition score using thermal imaging , 2013 .

[13]  J R Roche,et al.  Relationships among international body condition scoring systems. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  Melvyn L. Smith,et al.  Automated monitoring of dairy cow body condition, mobility and weight using a single 3D video capture device , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[15]  J M Bewley,et al.  Potential for estimation of body condition scores in dairy cattle from digital images. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  Yael Edan,et al.  Development of automatic body condition scoring using a low-cost 3-dimensional Kinect camera. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  R. Chebel,et al.  Association between body condition score change during the dry period and postpartum health and performance. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  Thomas B Farver,et al.  A Body Condition Scoring Chart for Holstein Dairy Cows , 1989 .

[19]  P. Faverdin,et al.  Rear shape in 3 dimensions summarized by principal component analysis is a good predictor of body condition score in Holstein dairy cows. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  I Halachmi,et al.  Cow body shape and automation of condition scoring. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  D. Berry,et al.  Influence of Holstein-Friesian strain and feed system on body weight and body condition score lactation profiles. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  S. Dufour,et al.  Short communication: An observational study investigating inter-observer agreement for variation over time of body condition score in dairy cows. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  R Staufenbiel,et al.  Invited review: Methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of backfat thickness. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.