The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards

SUMMARY 1. The flow regime is a primary determinant of the structure and function of aquatic and riparian ecosystems for streams and rivers. Hydrologic alteration has impaired riverine ecosystems on a global scale, and the pace and intensity of human development greatly exceeds the ability of scientists to assess the effects on a river-by-river basis. Current scientific understanding of hydrologic controls on riverine ecosystems and experience gained from individual river studies support development of environmental flow standards at the regional scale. 2. This paper presents a consensus view from a group of international scientists on a new framework for assessing environmental flow needs for many streams and rivers simultaneously to foster development and implementation of environmental flow standards at the regional scale. This framework, the ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA), is a synthesis of a number of existing hydrologic techniques and environmental flow methods that are currently being used to various degrees and that can support comprehensive regional flow management. The flexible approach allows

[1]  Jonathan G. Kennen,et al.  Use of an integrated flow model to estimate ecologically relevant hydrologic characteristics at stream biomonitoring sites , 2008 .

[2]  L. Johnson,et al.  Catchment and reach‐scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits , 1997 .

[3]  John Heasley,et al.  Users' manual for the Hydroecological Integrity Assessment Process software (including the New Jersey Assessment Tools) , 2006 .

[4]  M. Wiley,et al.  State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources a Landscape-based Ecological Classification System for River Valley Segments in Lower Michigan (mi-vsec Version 1.0) Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division a Landscape-based Ecological Classification System for River Valley Segme , 2022 .

[5]  A. H. Arthington,et al.  Accurately Defining the Reference Condition for Summary Biotic Metrics: A Comparison of Four Approaches , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  J. Mount,et al.  Alien Fishes in Natural Streams: Fish Distribution, Assemblage Structure, and Conservation in the Cosumnes River, California, U.S.A. , 2003, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[7]  M. Rains,et al.  Hydrological Connectivity of Headwaters to Downstream Waters: Introduction to the Featured Collection , 2007 .

[8]  G. Woodward,et al.  Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management , 2009 .

[9]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Changing Water Regimes: Riparian Plant Communities , 2002, Environmental management.

[10]  Ton H. Snelder,et al.  MULTISCALE RIVER ENVIRONMENT CLASSIFICATION FOR WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 1 , 2002 .

[11]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  MEETING ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIETAL NEEDS FOR FRESHWATER , 2002 .

[12]  Clair B. Stalnaker,et al.  Instream Flows for Riverine Resource Stewardship , 2002 .

[13]  Harry F. Lins,et al.  Streamflow trends in the United States , 1999 .

[14]  R. Moss,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[15]  Gregory B. Pasternack,et al.  Application of a 2D hydrodynamic model to design of reach‐scale spawning gravel replenishment on the Mokelumne River, California , 2004 .

[16]  M. Freeman,et al.  Fish Assemblage Responses to Water Withdrawals and Water Supply Reservoirs in Piedmont Streams , 2006, Environmental management.

[17]  J. Melack,et al.  IMPACTS OF CALIFORNIA'S CLIMATIC REGIMES AND COASTAL LAND USE CHANGE ON STREAMFLOW CHARACTERISTICS 1 , 2003 .

[18]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[19]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Hydraulic Food-Chain ModelsAn approach to the study of food-web dynamics in large rivers , 1995 .

[20]  Mike Acreman,et al.  Defining environmental river flow requirements ? a review , 2004 .

[21]  Keith F. Walker,et al.  Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers , 1998 .

[22]  O. Bragg,et al.  DHRAM: a method for classifying river flow regime alterations for the EC Water Framework Directive , 2005 .

[23]  Ger Bergkamp,et al.  Flow: the essentials of environmental flows , 2002 .

[24]  Brian Richter,et al.  River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making , 2003 .

[25]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Freshwater ecosystem services. , 1997 .

[26]  P. Gleick.  Global Freshwater Resources: Soft-Path Solutions for the 21st Century , 2003, Science.

[27]  Z. Bowen,et al.  Effects of flow regulation on shallow-water habitat dynamics and floodplain connectivity , 2003 .

[28]  R. Naiman,et al.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[29]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Managing for variability to sustain freshwater ecosystems , 2009 .

[30]  Geoffrey E. Petts,et al.  WATER ALLOCATION TO PROTECT RIVER ECOSYSTEMS , 1996 .

[31]  Keith F. Walker,et al.  A perspective on dryland river ecosystems , 1995 .

[32]  P. Moyle,et al.  EFFECTS OF FLOW REGIME ON FISH ASSEMBLAGES IN A REGULATED CALIFORNIA STREAM , 2001 .

[33]  T. Hardy,et al.  Extrapolation of site‐specific weighted usable area curves and instream flow requirements to unmeasured streams within the Nooksack watershed in support of strategic watershed planning , 2009 .

[34]  Angela H. Arthington,et al.  Multiscale effects of flow regime and habitat and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia , 2007 .

[35]  A. Arthington,et al.  Discharge variability and the development of predictive models relating stream fish assemblage structure to habitat in northeastern Australia , 2000 .

[36]  M. Palmer,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Climate change and the world ’ s river basins : anticipating management options , 2007 .

[37]  G. Meffe.  Effects of Abiotic Disturbance on Coexistence of Predator-Prey Fish Species , 1984 .

[38]  D. Goodrich,et al.  Hydrologic requirements of and consumptive ground-water use by riparian vegetation along the San Pedro River, Arizona. Chapters A-D. , 2006 .

[39]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Rainfall-runoff modelling in gauged and ungauged catchments , 2004 .

[40]  Mercedes Pascual,et al.  Ecology for a Crowded Planet , 2004, Science.

[41]  Michael J. Stewardson,et al.  Use of wetted perimeter in defining minimum environmental flows , 1998 .

[42]  P. Beier.  Being Ethical as Conservation Biologists and as a Society , 2005 .

[43]  Ca Brown,et al.  Using multicriteria analysis to develop environmental flow scenarios for rivers targeted for water resource management , 2004 .

[44]  David M. Hannah,et al.  Classification of river regimes: a context for hydroecology. , 2000 .

[45]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[46]  S. Rood,et al.  Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment—An integrative model , 1998, Wetlands.

[47]  Panayiotis Diplas,et al.  Applying spatial hydraulic principles to quantify stream habitat , 2006 .

[48]  Ton H. Snelder,et al.  Improved eco‐hydrological classification of rivers , 2005 .

[49]  Brian Richter,et al.  Application of the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration Software in Environmental Flow Setting 1 , 2007 .

[50]  M. Acreman,et al.  Generalisation of physical habitat-discharge relationships , 2007 .

[51]  Philippe Usseglio-Polatera,et al.  Biological and ecological traits of benthic freshwater macroinvertebrates: relationships and definition of groups with similar traits , 2000 .

[52]  Cate Brown,et al.  Environmental Flows: Striking the Balance between Development and Resource Protection , 2006 .

[53]  B. L. Lamb,et al.  Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology , 1998 .

[54]  R. Tharme.  A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers , 2003 .

[55]  B. Biggs,et al.  Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function , 2005 .

[56]  J. Stromberg,et al.  Importance of low-flow and high-flow characteristics to restoration of riparian vegetation along rivers in arid south-western United States , 2007 .

[57]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  A step increase in streamflow in the conterminous United States , 2002 .

[58]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[59]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins by combining hydrologic indices regionalization and multiobjective optimization , 2008, Water Resources Research.

[60]  Brian D. Richter,et al.  Prescribing Flood Regimes to Sustain Riparian Ecosystems along Meandering Rivers , 2000 .

[61]  C. Konrad,et al.  Assessing streamflow characteristics as limiting factors on benthic invertebrate assemblages in streams across the western United States , 2008 .

[62]  M. Power,et al.  Effects of Disturbance on River Food Webs , 1996, Science.

[63]  Yves Souchon,et al.  Predicting Velocity Frequency Distributions in Stream Reaches , 1995 .

[64]  G. Daily.  Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[65]  Brian P. Bledsoe,et al.  Predicting streamflow regime metrics for ungauged streamsin Colorado, Washington, and Oregon , 2006 .

[66]  Mohammad Rayej,et al.  Climate Driven Water Resources Model of the Sacramento Basin, California , 2009 .

[67]  Angela H. Arthington,et al.  Environmental flow requirements of fish in Lesotho rivers using the DRIFT methodology , 2003 .

[68]  Ian G. Cowx,et al.  Environmental flows from dams: the water framework directive , 2009 .

[69]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Implications of Streamflow Variability and Predictability for Lotic Community Structure: A Regional Analysis of Streamflow Patterns , 1989 .

[70]  R. Vogel,et al.  Relations among storage, yield, and instream flow , 2007 .

[71]  Robert J. Naiman.  New Perspectives for Watershed Management: Balancing Long-Term Sustainability with Cumulative Environmental Change , 1992 .

[72]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance , 1999 .

[73]  E. Stanley,et al.  Effective discharge analysis of ecological processes in streams , 2005 .

[74]  D. Hannah,et al.  Selection of river flow indices for the assessment of hydroecological change , 2007 .

[75]  C. Gippel.  Environmental Flows: Managing Hydrological Environments , 2006 .

[76]  Piotr Parasiewicz,et al.  Using MesoHABSIM to develop reference habitat template and ecological management scenarios , 2007 .

[77]  A. H. Arthington,et al.  Development and Application of a Predictive Model of Freshwater Fish Assemblage Composition to Evaluate River Health in Eastern Australia , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[78]  James R. Karr,et al.  Regional Application of an Index of Biotic Integrity Based on Stream Fish Communities , 1984 .

[79]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[80]  D. Molden.  Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture , 2007 .

[81]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[82]  J. Meyer,et al.  Standards for ecologically successful river restoration , 2005 .

[83]  Jonathan G. Kennen,et al.  Development of the Hydroecological Integrity Assessment Process for Determining Environmental Flows for New Jersey Streams , 2007 .

[84]  R. Jacobson,et al.  Flow and form in rehabilitation of large-river ecosystems: An example from the Lower Missouri River , 2006 .

[85]  J. King,et al.  A scenario‐based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers , 2003 .

[86]  V. Singh,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology , 2002 .

[87]  George H. Leavesley,et al.  The model parameter estimation experiment (MOPEX) , 2006 .

[88]  Mike R. Scarsbrook,et al.  Quantifying Disturbance in Streams: Alternative Measures of Disturbance in Relation to Macroinvertebrate Species Traits and Species Richness , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[89]  K. Rogers.  The real river management challenge: integrating scientists, stakeholders and service agencies , 2006 .

[90]  R. Naiman,et al.  Legitimizing Fluvial Ecosystems as Users of Water: An Overview , 2002, Environmental management.

[91]  R. Norris,et al.  Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams , 2009 .

[92]  Q. Duana,et al.  Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops , 2006 .

[93]  Brian D. Richter,et al.  A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations , 2006 .

[94]  Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury,et al.  Assessing Sustainability of Logging Practices in the Congo Basin’s Managed Forests: the Issue of Commercial Species Recovery , 2006 .

[95]  G. Pasternack,et al.  APPLICATION OF A 2 D HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL TO DESIGN OF REACH-SCALE SPAWNING GRAVEL REPLENISHMENT ON THE MOKELUMNE RIVER , 2004 .

[96]  Angela H. Arthington,et al.  Partitioning the variation in stream fish assemblages within a spatio-temporal hierarchy , 2007 .

[97]  J. Olden,et al.  Placing global stream flow variability in geographic and geomorphic contexts , 2006 .

[98]  A. Arthington,et al.  Water requirements of floodplain rivers and fisheries: existing decision support tools and pathways for development , 2007 .

[99]  A. H. Zakri,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report , 2005 .

[100]  J. Allan,et al.  Functional Organization of Stream Fish Assemblages in Relation to Hydrological Variability , 1995 .

[101]  Marla H. Stuckey.  Low-flow, base-flow, and mean-flow regression equations for Pennsylvania streams , 2006 .

[102]  Mary C. Freeman,et al.  Investigating hydrologic alteration as a mechanism of fish assemblage shifts in urbanizing streams , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[103]  D. Lytle,et al.  Adaptation to natural flow regimes. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[104]  P Cottingham,et al.  Scientific panels and their use in environmental flow assessment in Australia , 2002 .

[105]  John L Stoddard,et al.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[106]  K. Winemiller,et al.  Fish environmental guilds as a tool for assessment of ecological condition of rivers , 2006 .

[107]  S. Postel,et al.  Rivers for Life: Managing Water For People And Nature , 2003 .

[108]  K. Rose,et al.  Patterns of Life-History Diversification in North American Fishes: implications for Population Regulation , 1992 .

[109]  Jonathan V. Higgins,et al.  A Freshwater Classification Approach for Biodiversity Conservation Planning , 2005 .

[110]  Mike Acreman,et al.  Ethical aspects of water and ecosystems , 2001 .

[111]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. , 2000, Science.

[112]  A. Arthington,et al.  Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers , 2003 .

[113]  Nicolas Lamouroux,et al.  Depth Probability Distributions in Stream Reaches , 1998 .

[114]  K. Fausch,et al.  FLOOD DISTURBANCE REGIMES INFLUENCE RAINBOW TROUT INVASION SUCCESS AMONG FIVE HOLARCTIC REGIONS , 2001 .

[115]  Eric Viala,et al.  Water for food, water for life a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture , 2008 .

[116]  C. DeGasperi,et al.  Linking Hydrologic Alteration to Biological Impairment in Urbanizing Streams of the Puget Lowland, Washington, USA1 , 2009, Journal of the American Water Resources Association.

[117]  J. Finn,et al.  Streamflow regulation and fish community structure , 1988 .

[118]  G. Blöschl.  Rainfall‐Runoff Modeling of Ungauged Catchments , 2006 .

[119]  N. Poff,et al.  A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale‐dependence in some hydrological descriptors , 1996 .

[120]  J. Olden,et al.  Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes , 2003 .

[121]  A. Arthington,et al.  Environmental flow assessment with emphasis on holostic methodologies , 2004 .

[122]  S. Corbet,et al.  Freshwater Biology , 1971, Nature.

[123]  Developing a hydrological model for the Mekong Basin: impacts of basin development on fisheries productivity , 2000 .

[124]  B. Cade,et al.  Application of the Hydroecological Integrity Assessment Process for Missouri Streams , 2009 .