Reconstructing the knee joint mechanism from kinematic data

The interpretation of joint kinematics data in terms of displacements is a product of the type of movement, the measurement technique and the underlying model of the joint implemented in optimization procedures. Kinematic constraints reducing the number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) are expected to compensate for measurement errors and noise, thus, increasing the reproducibility of joint angles. One approach already successfully applied by several groups approximates the healthy human knee joint as a compound hinge joint with minimal varus/valgus rotation. Most of these optimizations involve an orthogonality constraint. This contribution compares the effect of a model with and without orthogonality constraint on the obtained joint rotation angles. For this purpose, knee joint motion is simulated to generate kinematic data without noise and with normally distributed noise of varying size. For small noise the unconstrained model provides more accurate results, whereas for larger noise this is the case for the constrained model. This can be attributed to the shape of the objective function of the unconstrained model near its minimum.

[1]  William R Taylor,et al.  A survey of formal methods for determining functional joint axes. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  W. Henke Handbuch der Anatomie und Mechanik der Gelenke : mit Rücksicht auf Luxationen und Contracturen , 1863 .

[3]  N E Akalan,et al.  Three-dimensional knee model: constrained by isometric ligament bundles and experimentally obtained tibio-femoral contacts. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Axes of Rotation of the Knee , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  An optimized protocol for hip joint centre determination using the functional method. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  L Claes,et al.  Correction of axis misalignment in the analysis of knee rotations. , 2003, Human movement science.

[7]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  The Levenberg-Marquardt algo-rithm: Implementation and theory , 1977 .

[8]  V M Spitzer,et al.  Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Distal Part of the Femur Viewed in Virtual Reality , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  B. Beynnon,et al.  The Transepicondylar Axis Approximates the Optimal Flexion Axis of the Knee , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Masao Akagi,et al.  The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  A. S. Levens,et al.  Transverse rotation of the segments of the lower extremity in locomotion. , 1948, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  V. Spitzer,et al.  Three-Dimensional Morphology and Kinematics of the Distal Part of the Femur Viewed in Virtual Reality: Part II , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Accuracy of the functional method of hip joint center location: effects of limited motion and varied implementation. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  A A Amis,et al.  Knee joint motion: Description and measurement , 1998, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  Anthony G Schache,et al.  Defining the knee joint flexion-extension axis for purposes of quantitative gait analysis: an evaluation of methods. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[16]  M. Schwartz,et al.  A new method for estimating joint parameters from motion data. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Rachel Ward,et al.  Anatomical constraints of the lower limb joints: Implications for kinematic modelling for quantitative gait analysis , 2006 .

[18]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Instantaneous helical axis estimation via natural, cross-validated splines , 1987 .

[19]  H. Woltring 3-D attitude representation of human joints: a standardization proposal. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Stefano Zaffagnini,et al.  Intraoperative kinematic protocol for knee joint evaluation , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[21]  S. Piazza,et al.  Measurement of the screw-home motion of the knee is sensitive to errors in axis alignment. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Jennifer M Scarvell,et al.  Development of the concepts of knee kinematics. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  S Martelli,et al.  Comparison of Three Kinematic Analyses of the Knee: Determination of Intrinsic Features and Applicability to Intraoperative Procedures , 2002, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[24]  Richard Baker,et al.  A new approach to determine the hip rotation profile from clinical gait analysis data , 1999 .

[25]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Cruciate coupling and screw-home mechanism in passive knee joint during extension--flexion. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  W. Taylor,et al.  A survey of formal methods for determining the centre of rotation of ball joints. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Michael Damsgaard,et al.  Do kinematic models reduce the effects of soft tissue artefacts in skin marker-based motion analysis? An in vivo study of knee kinematics. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  L Blankevoort,et al.  Helical axes of passive knee joint motions. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  I. Charlton,et al.  Repeatability of an optimised lower body model. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[30]  L. Blankevoort,et al.  Validation of a three-dimensional model of the knee. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  H. Rubash,et al.  Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  M. Freeman,et al.  A correlative study of the geometry and anatomy of the distal femur. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.