Transforming clinical practice guidelines and clinical pathways into fast-and-frugal decision trees to improve clinical care strategies.

BACKGROUND Contemporary delivery of health care is inappropriate in many ways, largely due to suboptimal Q5 decision-making. A typical approach to improve practitioners' decision-making is to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPG) by guidelines panels, who are instructed to use their judgments to derive practice recommendations. However, mechanisms for the formulation of guideline judgments remains a "black-box" operation-a process with defined inputs and outputs but without sufficient knowledge of its internal workings. METHODS Increased explicitness and transparency in the process can be achieved by implementing CPG as clinical pathways (CPs) (also known as clinical algorithms or flow-charts). However, clinical recommendations thus derived are typically ad hoc and developed by experts in a theory-free environment. As any recommendation can be right (true positive or negative), or wrong (false positive or negative), the lack of theoretical structure precludes the quantitative assessment of the management strategies recommended by CPGs/CPs. RESULTS To realize the full potential of CPGs/CPs, they need to be placed on more solid theoretical grounds. We believe this potential can be best realized by converting CPGs/CPs within the heuristic theory of decision-making, often implemented as fast-and-frugal (FFT) decision trees. This is possible because FFT heuristic strategy of decision-making can be linked to signal detection theory, evidence accumulation theory, and a threshold model of decision-making, which, in turn, allows quantitative analysis of the accuracy of clinical management strategies. CONCLUSIONS Fast-and-frugal provides a simple and transparent, yet solid and robust, methodological framework connecting decision science to clinical care, a sorely needed missing link between CPGs/CPs and patient outcomes. We therefore advocate that all guidelines panels express their recommendations as CPs, which in turn should be converted into FFTs to guide clinical care.

[1]  Jan K. Woike,et al.  FFTrees: A toolbox to create, visualize, and evaluate fast-and-frugal decision trees , 2017, Judgment and Decision Making.

[2]  Matteo Bonini,et al.  Why do doctors and patients not follow guidelines? , 2009, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  M. Rosenthal Physician Payment after the SGR--The New Meritocracy. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  M E Hammond,et al.  The challenge of variation in medical practice. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[5]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on , 2017, The Lancet.

[6]  C. Cassel,et al.  Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. , 2012, JAMA.

[7]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Going from evidence to recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision‐making , 2017, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[9]  Diana B Petitti,et al.  Update on the Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Insufficient Evidence , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Rational decision making in medicine: Implications for overuse and underuse , 2017, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[11]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  D. Berwick,et al.  Eliminating waste in US health care. , 2012, JAMA.

[13]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  One-reason decision-making: Modeling violations of expected utility theory , 2008 .

[14]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  S. Edge,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Criteria for High-Quality Clinical Pathways in Oncology. , 2017, Journal of Oncology Practice.

[16]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Personal Decisions Are the Leading Cause of Death , 2008, Oper. Res..

[17]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  More than a billion people taking statins?: Potential implications of the new cardiovascular guidelines. , 2014, JAMA.

[18]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  A signal-detection analysis of fast-and-frugal trees. , 2011, Psychological review.

[19]  Romina Brignardello-Petersen,et al.  Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise , 2014, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[20]  C. Manski Improving Clinical Guidelines and Decisions Under Uncertainty , 2017 .

[21]  P. Pronovost Enhancing physicians' use of clinical guidelines. , 2013, JAMA.

[22]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Towards theory integration: Threshold model as a link between signal detection theory, fast‐and‐frugal trees and evidence accumulation theory , 2017, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[23]  Ian Bullock,et al.  A Summary of the Methods That the National Clinical Guideline Centre Uses to Produce Clinical Guidelines for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Epistemologic inquiries in evidence-based medicine. , 2009, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[26]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  Ross Upshur,et al.  Going from evidence to recommendations: Can GRADE get us there? , 2018, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[28]  Christine Laine,et al.  Trustworthy Clinical Guidelines , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  R. Winn,et al.  The NCCN Guidelines Development Program. , 1996, Oncology.

[30]  R. Harbour,et al.  A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[32]  M. Ebell,et al.  Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. , 2004, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice.

[33]  David Rind,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  Grace A Lin,et al.  Preoperative medical testing in Medicare patients undergoing cataract surgery. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Charles F Manski,et al.  Diagnostic testing and treatment under ambiguity: Using decision analysis to inform clinical practice , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  B. Djulbegovic A framework to bridge the gaps between evidence-based medicine, health outcomes, and improvement and implementation science. , 2014, Journal of oncology practice.

[37]  L. Newcomer,et al.  Payer View of High-Quality Clinical Pathways for Cancer. , 2017, Journal of oncology practice.

[38]  C. Nabhan,et al.  Oncology Pathways-Preventing a Good Idea From Going Bad. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[39]  D. Nash,et al.  Human judgment and health care policy. , 2014, Population health management.

[40]  Günter Ollenschläger,et al.  Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[41]  Thomas Agoritsas,et al.  Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent. , 2013, Chest.