No Effect of Musical Training on Frequency Selectivity Estimated Using Three Methods

It is widely believed that the frequency selectivity of the auditory system is largely determined by processes occurring in the cochlea. If so, musical training would not be expected to influence frequency selectivity. Consistent with this, auditory filter shapes for low center frequencies do not differ for musicians and nonmusicians. However, it has been reported that psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) at 4000 Hz were sharper for musicians than for nonmusicians. This study explored the origin of the discrepancy across studies. Frequency selectivity was estimated for musicians and nonmusicians using three methods: fast PTCs with a masker that swept in frequency, “traditional” PTCs obtained using several fixed masker center frequencies, and the notched-noise method. The signal frequency was 4000 Hz. The data were fitted assuming that each side of the auditory filter had the shape of a rounded-exponential function. The sharpness of the auditory filters, estimated as the Q10 values, did not differ significantly between musicians and nonmusicians for any of the methods, but detection efficiency tended to be higher for the musicians. This is consistent with the idea that musicianship influences auditory proficiency but does not influence the peripheral processes that determine the frequency selectivity of the auditory system.

[1]  B. Moore Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  B. Moore,et al.  Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects , 2004, Hearing Research.

[3]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  Informational masking and musical training. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Frequency Analysis and Musical Ability , 1993 .

[6]  R. Patterson,et al.  Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Christian J Sumner,et al.  Mammalian behavior and physiology converge to confirm sharper cochlear tuning in humans , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Gavin M. Bidelman,et al.  Musicianship enhances ipsilateral and contralateral efferent gain control to the cochlea , 2017, Hearing Research.

[10]  B C Moore,et al.  Relation between pitch shifts and MMF shifts in forward masking. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Stephen T. Neely,et al.  Signals, Sound, and Sensation , 1997 .

[12]  R. M. Sachs,et al.  Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination , 2006, Hearing Research.

[14]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Effects of activation of the efferent system on psychophysical tuning curves as a function of signal frequency , 2008, Hearing Research.

[15]  Brian C. J. Moore Detection Cues in Forward Masking , 1980 .

[16]  D. L. Neff,et al.  Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Kohlrausch,et al.  The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Prestin is required for electromotility of the outer hair cell and for the cochlear amplifier , 2002, Nature.

[19]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[20]  B C Moore,et al.  Off-frequency listening: effects on psychoacoustical tuning curves obtained in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Pamela Souza,et al.  Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Suppression Tuning in Humans: Comparison to Behavioral Tuning , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[22]  B C Moore,et al.  The danger of using narrow-band noise maskers to measure "suppression". , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. Guinan Olivocochlear Efferents: Anatomy, Physiology, Function, and the Measurement of Efferent Effects in Humans , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[24]  David R. Soderquist Frequency analysis and the critical band , 1970 .

[25]  Elliott H. Berger,et al.  Diffuse field response of the ear , 1987 .

[26]  Azadeh Vosoughi,et al.  Predictions of diotic tone-in-noise detection based on a nonlinear optimal combination of energy, envelope, and fine-structure cues. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Arnold M. Small,et al.  Pure‐Tone Masking , 1959 .

[28]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Prediction of absolute thresholds and equal-loudness contours using a modified loudness model. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  B C Moore "Suppression" effects in forward masking. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Deborah A Vickers,et al.  The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns at 2 kHz: I. Normal-hearing listeners , 2000, Hearing Research.

[31]  Gavin M Bidelman,et al.  Psychophysical auditory filter estimates reveal sharper cochlear tuning in musicians. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Thomas Baer,et al.  A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness , 1997 .

[33]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrow-band noise maskers. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Effect of broadband and narrowband contralateral noise on psychophysical tuning curves and otoacoustic emissions. , 2014, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  V S Shupliakov [Frequency characteristics of the masking effect: relationship between the characteristic variation factor and the frequency of the tone being masked]. , 1980, Fiziologicheskii zhurnal SSSR imeni I. M. Sechenova.

[36]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  B C Moore,et al.  Masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrow-band noise maskers. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  B C Moore Mechanisms of masking. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Gavin M. Bidelman,et al.  Musical experience sharpens human cochlear tuning , 2016, Hearing Research.

[40]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Implementation of a fast method for measuring psychophysical tuning curves , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[41]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Psychophysical tuning curves: Restricting the listening band to the signal region , 1979 .

[42]  B C Moore,et al.  Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method. , 1992, British journal of audiology.