The Use of Distributed Information in Decision Making Groups: The Role of Shared Task Representations

Organizations frequently rely on groups for purposes of decision making, because groups are supposed to posses more relevant informational resources than individuals, which should allow them to make higher-quality decisions. Yet, research has shown that groups tend to be quite poor users of their informational resources. That is, information that only one of the group members possesses gets exchanged less than information that all members possess. Moreover, when this information does get exchanged, groups often fail to adequately integrate it in coming to a decision. This can lead to lower-quality decisions than when groups fully capitalize upon individual members’ unique information. It therefore is of importance to identify factors that affect decision-making groups’ use of distributed information. In the present research I argue that group members’ understanding of their task and its informational requirements is critical for groups’ use of distributed information. A fundamental reason for groups’ insufficient information use seems to be that groups often fail to see the necessity of elaborating on distributed information. Group members’ understanding of the decision-making task often seems to centre more on the need to find common ground than on the discussion of information. In the present dissertation I examine the effect of groups’ understanding of their decision task, as reflected in their shared task representations, on groups’ use of distributed information by means of a series of experiments. I show that when groups hold task representations that stress the value of exchanging and integration distributed information before coming to a decision, they discuss more distributed information and make higher-quality decisions. In addition, I identify several factors, like group reflexivity and leadership, that are able to influence the development of shared task representations and therefore also group information use and performance in decision making groups with distributed information.

[1]  Nancy Pennington,et al.  Cognitive and social processes in decision making , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[2]  M. Hogg,et al.  Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda , 2004 .

[3]  Robert van der Meer,et al.  Operational Control of Internal Transport , 2000 .

[4]  James Kohnen,et al.  Creating High Performance Organizations: Practices and Results of Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 Companies , 1996 .

[5]  S. Kozlowski Training and developing adaptive teams: Theory, principles, and research. , 1998 .

[6]  J. Appelman,et al.  Governance of Global Interorganizational Tourism Networks; Changing forms of co-ordination between the travel agency and aviation sector , 2004 .

[7]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction. , 1978 .

[9]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information , 1999 .

[10]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[11]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  The Collective Preference for Shared Information , 2001 .

[12]  Matthijs Wolters,et al.  The Business of Modularity and the Modularity of Business , 1999 .

[13]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[14]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[15]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  The utility of experimental research in the study of transformational/charismatic leadership , 1999 .

[16]  Michael J. Platow,et al.  Realizing the Diversity Dividend: Exploring the Subtle Interplay between Identity, Ideology, and Reality , 2003 .

[17]  N. Pennington,et al.  The story model for juror decision making , 1993 .

[18]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. , 1996 .

[19]  S. Reicher,et al.  Psychology and the End of History: A Critique and a Proposal for the Psychology of Social Categorization , 2001 .

[20]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[21]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Masanori Takezawa,et al.  Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence : An illustration in a group decision-making context , 1997 .

[23]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in-role and extra-role performance in China , 2003 .

[24]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[25]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[26]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[27]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[28]  Marcel van Rinsum,et al.  Performance Measurement and Managerial Time Orientation , 1999 .

[29]  D. Denison,et al.  From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model , 1996 .

[30]  W. D. Maeseneire,et al.  Essays on Firm Valuation and Value Appropriation , 2002 .

[31]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  Psychological Safety, Trust, and Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Lens. , 2004 .

[32]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[33]  K. Kraiger,et al.  Conceptual Development and Empirical Evaluation of Measures of Shared Mental Models as Indicators of Team Effectiveness , 1997 .

[34]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Leadership Style and the Discussion of Shared and Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[36]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? , 2002 .

[37]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[38]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm , 2004 .

[39]  P. C. vanFenema Coordination and Control of Globally Distributed Software Projects , 2002 .

[40]  M. Mol Outsourcing, Supplier Relations and Internationalisation: Global Sourcing Strategy as a Chinese Puzzle , 2001 .

[41]  Deanne N. Den Hartog,et al.  Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity , 2003 .

[42]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[43]  Craig D. Parks,et al.  Acceptance of Uncommon Information into Group Discussion When That Information Is or Is Not Demonstrable , 1996 .

[44]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise , 1997 .

[45]  M. West Reflexivity and work group effectiveness:a conceptual integration , 1996 .

[46]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[47]  John R. Austin Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  David A. Thomas,et al.  Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes , 2001 .

[49]  Andrea Ganzaroli,et al.  Creating trust between local and global systems , 2002 .

[50]  Kees Jan Roodbergen,et al.  Layout and routing methods for warehouses , 2001 .

[51]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Carsten K. W. De Dreu,et al.  Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity , 2002 .

[53]  Jos van Iwaarden,et al.  Changing Quality Controls: the effects of increasing product variety and shortening product life cycles , 2002 .

[54]  C Palazzolo,et al.  Group Decision-Making , 1996, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[55]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Groupand Individual Training , 1998 .

[56]  Reginald Hooghiemstra,et al.  The Construction of Reality , 2003 .

[57]  Joost Loef Incongruity between Ads and Consumer Expectations of Advertising , 2002 .

[58]  R. Hall,et al.  Members of great teams think alike: A model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. , 1994 .

[59]  Guido Berens,et al.  Corporate Branding: The Development of Corporate associations and their Influence on Stakeholder Reactions , 2004 .

[60]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[61]  Jeanine Kippers,et al.  Empirical Studies on Cash Payments , 2004 .

[62]  A. Hollingshead Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems , 1998 .

[63]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[64]  Katia Puente-Palacios,et al.  Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions , 2003 .

[65]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups : Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams , 1996 .

[66]  Erika D Peterson,et al.  Collective Efficacy and Aspects of Shared Mental Models as Predictors of Performance Over Time in Work Groups , 2000 .

[67]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making during International Crises , 1987 .

[68]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. , 1996 .

[70]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[71]  R. Klimoski,et al.  Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: antecedents of team member schema agreement , 2001 .

[72]  C. Burke,et al.  The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[73]  Dominique Delporte-Vermeiren Improving the flexibility and profitability of ICT-enabled business networks: an assessment method and tool. , 2003 .

[74]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups , 1994 .

[75]  C. Judd,et al.  Adjusting researchers' approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions , 2004 .

[76]  R. Bennett,et al.  The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. , 1993 .

[77]  G. Liang,et al.  New Competition; Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Development in China , 2004 .

[78]  R. J. House,et al.  A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness , 1971 .

[79]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[80]  K. Weick Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[81]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[82]  E. Dijk,et al.  Who Takes the Lead in Risky Decision Making? Effects of Group Members' Risk Preferences and Prototypicality , 2000 .

[83]  Garold Stasser,et al.  The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the role of an informed minority , 1998 .

[84]  Cyriel de Jong Dealing with Derivatives. Studies on the role, informational content and pricing of financial derivatives , 2003 .

[85]  M. Hogg,et al.  A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2003 .

[86]  A. Hollingshead Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[87]  E. Salas,et al.  Reflections on shared cognition , 2001 .

[88]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[89]  Raoul Pietersz Pricing Models for Bermudan-style Interest Rate Derivatives , 2001 .

[90]  Kevin Pak,et al.  Revenue Management: New Features and Models , 2000 .

[91]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[92]  E. Salas,et al.  Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. , 1996 .

[93]  Tatsuya Kameda,et al.  Procedural influence in small-group decision making: Deliberation style and assigned decision rule. , 1991 .

[94]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2002 .

[95]  Allan Muller,et al.  The Rise of Regionalism: Core Company Strategies Under The Second Wave of Integration , 2004 .

[96]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[97]  R. Tindale,et al.  ‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups , 2000 .

[98]  Garold Stasser,et al.  The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. , 1999 .

[99]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[100]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[101]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Information Pooling: When It Impacts Group Decision Making , 1998 .

[102]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[103]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .

[104]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .

[105]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[106]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[107]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[108]  R. Grover,et al.  From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[109]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  The Performance of Seaport Clusters; A Framework to Analyze Cluster Performance and an Application to the Seaport Clusters of Durban, Rotterdam and the Lower Mississippi , 2004 .

[110]  A. Slager,et al.  Banking across Borders , 1998 .

[111]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling Unshared Information: The Benefits of Knowing How Access to Information Is Distributed among Group Members , 2000 .

[112]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: managing unstructured task streams , 2003 .

[113]  Bert Flier,et al.  Strategic Renewal of European Financial Incumbents; Coevolution of Environmental Selection, Institutional Effects, and Managerial Intentionality , 2003 .

[114]  Randall S. Peterson,et al.  Assessing political group dynamics : a test of the groupthink model , 1992 .

[115]  Susan E. Jackson,et al.  Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. , 1991 .

[116]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[117]  C. Nemeth Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[118]  Michael A. West,et al.  Reflexivity, Effectiveness, and Mental Health in BBC-TV Production Teams , 1998 .

[119]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[120]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[121]  R. Hill,et al.  Metaphors and Mental Models: Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Innovative and Entrepreneurial Activities , 1995 .

[122]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Confronting Failure: Antecedents and Consequences of Shared Beliefs About Failure in Organizational Work Groups , 2001 .

[123]  Linda Argote,et al.  Training People to Work in Groups , 2002 .

[124]  Peter Miltenburg,et al.  Effects of modular sourcing on manufacturing flexibility in the automotive industry. A study among German OEMs , 2003 .

[125]  R.A.J.L. vanWijk Organizing Knowledge in Internal Networks; A Multilevel Study , 2003 .

[126]  Stephanie C. Payne,et al.  Enhancing Team Mental Model Measurement with Performance Appraisal Practices , 2000 .

[127]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[128]  Linda Teunter,et al.  Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior , 2002 .