Emotions in Leadership in an IOIS Project

This interpretive grounded theory (GT) study describes and analyzes emotions in leadership in a Nordic inter-organizational information system (IOIS) project which spanned four user organizations, two suppliers, one national organization, a research organization and a Ministry. This study shows how GT can be used to gain significant insights into a case study, and generate new concepts. We identified Certainty, Significance, Connection and Contribution as important selective codes that make up the Emotions category. The paper focuses on leadership issues in the emotion category. The paper concludes by discussing how some of leadership issues could be attributed to emotions issues and considers some theoretical and practical implications.

[1]  F. Michael Connelly,et al.  Personal experience methods. , 1994 .

[2]  A. Pescosolido Emergent leaders as managers of group emotion , 2002 .

[3]  C. Urquhart The evolving nature of grounded theory method: the case of the information systems discipline , 2007 .

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[5]  B. Glaser Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[6]  J. George Emotions and Leadership: The Role of Emotional Intelligence , 2000 .

[7]  Yiannis Gabriel The Unmanaged Organization: Stories, Fantasies and Subjectivity , 1995 .

[8]  I. Craib Some Comments on the Sociology of the Emotions , 1995 .

[9]  N. Denzin Grounded Theory and the Politics of Interpretation , 2007 .

[10]  D. Allen Organisational climate and strategic change in higher education: Organisational insecurity , 2003 .

[11]  Michael Newman Information Systems Design. Stress and Organizational Change in the Ambulance Service: A tale of Two Cities , 1996 .

[12]  Randy Englund Human resource skills for the project manager: The human aspects of project management , 1998 .

[13]  M. Dasborough,et al.  Cognitive asymmetry in employee emotional reactions to leadership behaviors , 2006 .

[14]  Nannette P. Napier,et al.  IT project managers' construction of successful project management practice: a repertory grid investigation , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[16]  Michael Newman,et al.  Information system design, stress and organisational change in the ambulance services: A tale of two cities , 1996 .

[17]  S. Sarker,et al.  Seeing Remote Team Members as Leaders: A Study of US-Scandinavian Teams , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[18]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[19]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Cognitive Elements in the Implementation of New Technology: Can Less Information Provide More Benefits? , 1996, MIS Q..

[20]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Expectation failure concept and systems analysts' view of information system failures: Results of an exploratory study , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[21]  C. Izard,et al.  Four systems for emotion activation: cognitive and noncognitive processes. , 1993, Psychological review.

[22]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Integrated A.I. systems , 2007, Minds and Machines.

[23]  Gregory M. Rose,et al.  Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research , 2000 .

[24]  R. Ryan Nelson,et al.  IT Project Management: Infamous Failures, Classic Mistakes, and Best Practices , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.

[25]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Information systems development by US-Norwegian virtual teams: implications of time and space , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[26]  J. Kendall Axial Coding and the Grounded Theory Controversy , 1999, Western journal of nursing research.

[27]  K. Charmaz,et al.  The sage handbook of grounded theory , 2007 .

[28]  James J. Jiang,et al.  The Relative Influence of IS Project Implementation Policies and Project Leadership on Eventual Outcomes , 2001 .

[29]  Stephen Fineman,et al.  Understanding emotion at work , 2003 .

[30]  E. Trauth Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends , 2001 .

[31]  Andrew Sturdy,et al.  Knowing the Unknowable? A Discussion of Methodological and Theoretical Issues in Emotion Research and Organizational Studies , 2003 .

[32]  Saonee Sarker,et al.  Emergence of leaders in virtual teams: what matters? , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..

[34]  Dennis Wittmer,et al.  Influence Methods of Project Managers: Perceptions of Team Members and Project Managers , 2001 .

[35]  C. Urquhart An encounter with grounded theory: tackling the practical and philosophical issues , 2001 .

[36]  MarkusM. Lynne,et al.  The experienced "sense" of a virtual community , 2004 .

[37]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Determinants of Effective Leadership in Information Systems Development Teams: An Exploratory Study of Face-to-Face and Virtual Contexts , 2007 .

[38]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Grounded Theory Method: The Researcher as Blank Slate and Other Myths , 2006, ICIS.

[39]  Cyril H. P. Brookes,et al.  Information Systems Design , 1982 .

[40]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects , 2000, MIS Q..

[41]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Information systems leadership , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[42]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Leadership of information systems development projects , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[43]  Yu Zhao,et al.  The process of enterprise resource planning implementation and business process re‐engineering: tales from two Chinese small and medium‐sized enterprises , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[44]  P. A. D. DeMaine,et al.  Integrated Systems , 1991 .

[45]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  The experienced "sense" of a virtual community: characteristics and processes , 2004, DATB.

[46]  Michael Newman,et al.  INTEGRATED SYSTEM, AUTONOMOUS DEPARTMENTS: ORGANIZATIONAL INVALIDITY AND SYSTEM CHANGE IN A UNIVERSITY* , 1993 .

[47]  B. Glaser Doing grounded theory : issues and discussions , 1998 .

[48]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration , 2008, MIS Q..

[49]  Kathy McGrath,et al.  Affection not affliction: The role of emotions in information systems and organizational change , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[50]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Important Behavioral Skills for is Project Managers: The Judgments of Experienced is Professionals , 1998 .