Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces

In recent decades, great technological strides have been made toward enabling people who are blind to live independent, successful lives. However, there has been relatively little progress towards understanding the social, collaborative needs of this population, particularly in the domestic setting. We conducted semi-structured interviews in the homes of 10 pairs of close companions in which one partner was blind and one was not. We found that partners engaged in collaborative accessibility by taking active roles in co-creating an accessible environment. Due to their different visual abilities, however, partners sometimes encountered difficulties managing divergent needs and engaging in shared experiences. We describe outstanding challenges to creating accessible shared home spaces and outline new research and technology opportunities for supporting collaborative accessibility in the home.

[1]  Gillian R. Hayes,et al.  Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology , 2010, ASSETS '10.

[2]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions , 2011, CHI.

[3]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Designing Home Appliances for Older Adults , 2003 .

[4]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Developing dual user interfaces for integrating blind and sighted users: the HOMER UIMS , 1995, CHI '95.

[5]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  Supporting spatial awareness and independent wayfinding for pedestrians with visual impairments , 2011, ASSETS '11.

[6]  Peter Gregor,et al.  “User sensitive inclusive design”— in search of a new paradigm , 2000, CUU '00.

[7]  Allison Druin,et al.  Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility , 2006, TCHI.

[8]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[9]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Lovers' box: Designing for reflection within romantic relationships , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Matthew T. Atkinson,et al.  Making the Mainstream Accessible: What's in a Game? , 2006, ICCHP.

[11]  John Bowers,et al.  Assembling the senses: towards the design of cooperative interfaces for visually impaired users , 2004, CSCW.

[12]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  The calendar is crucial: Coordination and awareness through the family calendar , 2009, TCHI.

[13]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Domestic Routines and Design for the Home , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[14]  Christopher A. Le Dantec,et al.  Finding a new normal: the role of technology in life disruptions , 2012, CSCW.

[15]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples , 2011, TACC.

[16]  Sarah Diefenbach,et al.  All You Need is Love: Current Strategies of Mediating Intimate Relationships through Technology , 2012, TCHI.

[17]  Beryl Plimmer,et al.  Multimodal collaborative handwriting training for visually-impaired people , 2008, CHI.

[18]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Access Invaders: Developing a Universally Accessible Action Game , 2006, ICCHP.

[19]  Karrie Karahalios,et al.  ACES: promoting empathy towards aphasia through language distortion emulation software , 2011, CHI.

[20]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Universal Usability , 2000, UBIQ.

[21]  David R. Flatla,et al.  "So that's what you see": building understanding with personalized simulations of colour vision deficiency , 2012, ASSETS '12.

[22]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars , 2013, CSCW '13.

[23]  Kori Inkpen Quinn,et al.  Yours, Mine and Ours? Sharing and Use of Technology in Domestic Environments , 2007, UbiComp.

[24]  Steve Harrison,et al.  Connecting Families: The Impact of New Communication Technologies on Domestic Life , 2012 .

[25]  Timothy Sohn,et al.  An examination of how households share and coordinate the completion of errands , 2012, CSCW.

[26]  Ingrid Scott,et al.  Perceptual Impairments: New Advancements Promoting Technological Access , 2007 .

[27]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  The roles that make the domestic work , 2010, CSCW '10.

[28]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[29]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Informing the Development of Calendar Systems for Domestic Use , 2003, ECSCW.

[30]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  I love you, let's share calendars: calendar sharing as relationship work , 2012, CSCW.

[31]  Richard Harper,et al.  The Connected Home: The Future of Domestic Life , 2012 .

[32]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Designing audio-enhanced paper photos for older adult emotional wellbeing in communication therapy , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  I. V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  More than meets the eye: a survey of screen-reader browsing strategies , 2010, W4A.

[34]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Supporting medical conversations between deaf and hearing individuals with tabletop displays , 2008, CSCW.

[35]  Steve Harrison,et al.  Designing for Collocated Couples , 2013 .

[36]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities , 2009, Assets '09.

[37]  Kristen Shinohara,et al.  Observing Sara: a case study of a blind person's interactions with technology , 2007, Assets '07.

[38]  Rob Miller,et al.  VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions , 2010, UIST.