‘People Just Need to Try It to Be Converted!’: A Picture of Consumer Mental Health Research in Australia and New Zealand

Abstract A range of barriers that impede collaborations between consumer researchers and other researchers have been identified, despite clear acknowledgement of the benefits of this approach in the literature. Recent research has questioned whether the costs of collaborative research outweigh the benefits. The overarching aim of the current study is to better understand non-consumer researchers’ attitudes to, and issues concerning, engagement with consumer researchers. Non-consumer researchers from mental health disciplines were invited to participate in the cross-sectional Consumers as Researchers in Mental Health survey, and to respond to open-ended questions about their experiences of collaborative research with consumer researchers. The findings demonstrate a range of benefits associated with collaborations with consumer researchers – including increased relevance and credibility of research, and greater translation of research findings into changes in health policy, service, research and education. Collaborations were found to be varied and not limited by research design, decision-making styles, or research topic. Understanding these benefits within the context of identified barriers can make an important contribution to the proliferation of mental health consumer researcher roles.

[1]  L. Berring,et al.  Service user's actual involvement in mental health research practices: A scoping review. , 2019, International journal of mental health nursing.

[2]  C. Platania‐Phung,et al.  'There's just no flexibility': How space and time impact mental health consumer research. , 2019, International journal of mental health nursing.

[3]  N. Hancock,et al.  Using systematic collaborative reflection to enhance consumer-led mental health research , 2019, British Journal of Occupational Therapy.

[4]  E. Georgousopoulou,et al.  Consumer and carer leadership in palliative care academia and practice: A systematic review with narrative synthesis , 2019, Palliative medicine.

[5]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co‐design pilot , 2019, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[6]  Kathryn Oliver,et al.  The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? , 2019, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[7]  C. Platania‐Phung,et al.  “Chipping away”: non-consumer researcher perspectives on barriers to collaborating with consumers in mental health research , 2019, Journal of mental health.

[8]  J. Bayley,et al.  Building the concept of research impact literacy , 2019, Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice.

[9]  C. Platania‐Phung,et al.  Mental Health Researchers’ Views About Service User Research: A Literature Review , 2018, Issues in mental health nursing.

[10]  C. Platania‐Phung,et al.  Understanding the current sexual health service provision for mental health consumers by nurses in mental health settings: Findings from a Survey in Australia and England , 2018, International journal of mental health nursing.

[11]  C. Platania‐Phung,et al.  How did I not see that? Perspectives of nonconsumer mental health researchers on the benefits of collaborative research with consumers , 2018, International journal of mental health nursing.

[12]  E. Bjornsson,et al.  ‘To be treated as a human’: Using co‐production to explore experts by experience involvement in mental health nursing education – The COMMUNE project , 2018, International journal of mental health nursing.

[13]  C. Platania‐Phung,et al.  Turning the Tables: Power Relations Between Consumer Researchers and Other Mental Health Researchers , 2018, Issues in mental health nursing.

[14]  B. Happell,et al.  Breaking through the Glass Ceiling: Consumers in Mental Health Organisations' Hierarchies , 2017, Issues in mental health nursing.

[15]  L. Davidson,et al.  Collaborating to stay open and aware: Service user involvement in mental health research as an aid in reflexivity , 2017 .

[16]  C. McGarty,et al.  Barriers to genuine consumer and carer participation from the perspectives of Australian systemic mental health advocates , 2016, Journal of mental health.

[17]  R. Porter,et al.  Conducting qualitative research in mental health: Thematic and content analyses , 2015, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[18]  S. Meddings,et al.  Co-delivered and co-produced: creating a recovery college in partnership , 2014 .

[19]  Steve Gillard,et al.  Patient and Public Involvement in the Coproduction of Knowledge , 2012, Qualitative health research.

[20]  G. Walter,et al.  CHALLENGING CONVENTIONAL PRACTICE: PLACING CONSUMERS AT THE CENTRE OF THE RESEARCH ENTERPRISE , 2007, Issues in mental health nursing.

[21]  E. Speed Patients, consumers and survivors: a case study of mental health service user discourses. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[22]  H. Christensen,et al.  Academic Consumer Researchers: A Bridge Between Consumers and Researchers , 2004 .