Translation Quality of Expressive Speech Acts : An Implementation of Bald on Record Impoliteness in the Translation Novel qThe Silkwormq

This study reveals how expressive speech acts representing an impoliteness strategy used in the novel. In many cases impoliteness used in speech acts is to make a disharmony relationship, but not in bald on record impoliteness strategy. This strategy explores some other ways to express the speaker’s emotion, feelings, and other psychological condition in responding situations happened. Using the theory of impoliteness proposed by Culpeper this study tries to convey some evidences of implementation at one of the theory of impoliteness strategies. The data is qualitative which is some utterances representing impoliteness and explored in descriptive ones, so that in explaining this uses descriptive-qualitative method. The data is analysed using a content analysis through purposive sampling to get the purpose of study. In assessing the quality of translation uses an assessment model designed by Nababan et,als. in which there are accurate, acceptable and readable aspects. The study results this impoliteness strategy is not the intention of the speaker to attack the hearer’s face. Most of the translation have a medium level of quality. This finding hopefully may contribute to develop a discussion of impoliteness strategy for other objects. Keywords—impoliteness; bald on record impoliteness; descriptive-qualitative; translation quality

[1]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  The handbook of pragmatics , 2004 .

[2]  Suzanne Abrams Rebillard The Speech Act of Swearing: Gregory of Nazianzus’s Oath in Poema 2.1.2 in Context , 2013 .

[3]  Jonathan Culpeper Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence , 2011 .

[4]  S. Biscetti Power, (Im)Politeness and Aggressiveness in Early Modern Master-Servant Relations (1660-1750) , 2015 .

[5]  Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics: Sorting out the Muddle. , 2007 .

[6]  A. Ahmadi,et al.  Should We Teach the Impolite Language? A Study of Iranian EFL Learners, Teachers, Experts and Non-Iranian Experts‟ Attitudes , 2011 .

[7]  S. Bacchini The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics , 2016 .

[8]  Karim El Hiani Performing Speech Acts among Moroccan EFL Advanced Learners , 2015 .

[9]  Jonathan Culpeper,et al.  Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. , 1996 .

[10]  Keith Allan The Routledge Handbook of Linguistics , 2015 .

[11]  Oriol Valentín,et al.  The Pragmatics of Politeness , 2014 .

[12]  Nihat Bayat,et al.  A Study on the use of Speech Acts , 2013 .

[13]  M. Aliakbari,et al.  Variation of Politeness Strategies among the Iranian Students , 2015 .

[14]  N. Aydınoğlu Politeness and Impoliteness Strategies: An Analysis of Gender Differences in Geralyn l. Horton's Plays , 2013 .

[15]  Timothy B. Jay The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[16]  Christopher J. Hall,et al.  Introducing Language in Use , 2014 .

[17]  Sumardiono,et al.  Pengembangan Model Penilaian Kualitas Terjemahan , 2012 .

[18]  M. Witek An interactional account of illocutionary practice , 2015 .

[19]  Tahmineh Tayebi Why do people take offence? Exploring the underlying expectations , 2016 .

[20]  Conflict, Cooperation, and Facework in Contrasto Verbal Duels , 2010 .

[21]  D. Kádár,et al.  The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness , 2017 .

[22]  S.-Q. Liu An experimental study of the classification and recognition of Chinese speech acts , 2011 .

[23]  J. Ardila Meaning in Language. An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics , 2011 .

[24]  Despoina Panou Equivalence in Translation Theories: A Critical Evaluation , 2013 .

[25]  Atefeh Nikoobin,et al.  Impoliteness in the Realization of Complaint Speech Acts: A Comparative Study of Iranian EFL Learners and Native English Speakers , 2017 .

[26]  Magnus Ljung,et al.  Swearing: A Cross-Cultural Linguistic Study , 2010 .

[27]  Angelica Hobjilă Positive Politeness and Negative Politeness in Didactic Communication – Landmarks in Teaching Methodology , 2012 .

[28]  木村 和夫 Pragmatics , 1997, Language Teaching.

[29]  I. Kecskés The paradox of communication: Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics , 2010 .

[30]  Fatima Hussain Felemban Building up Learners’ Communicative Competence: the Politeness Principle , 2012 .

[31]  Miriam A. Locher,et al.  The role of emotions in relational work , 2013 .