A novel autologous-made matrix using hyaline cartilage chips and platelet-rich growth factors for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage or osteochondral defects: Preliminary results

Purpose: To report the clinical, functional, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based outcomes of a novel autologous-made matrix consisting of hyaline cartilage chips combined with mixed plasma poor rich in platelets clot and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) for the treatment of knee full-thickness cartilage or osteochondral defects. Methods: Between July 2015 and January 2018, all patients with full-thickness cartilage or osteochondral defects undergoing this novel cartilage restoration surgical technique were approached for eligibility. Indications for this procedure included traumatic or atraumatic full-thickness knee cartilage defects or osteochondritis dissecans. Patients were included if they had no concomitant use of stem cells, previous ipsilateral cartilage repair procedure, or follow-up was less than 10 months. The outcomes included data on current symptoms, physical exam, patient-reported, and functional outcomes (visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Lequesne index, and short form-12 (SF-12)) and the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score. These outcomes were compared to preoperative values, except for the MOCART score. Results: Fifteen patients were included in this preliminary study: mean (standard deviation (SD), range) follow-up 15.9 months (7.2, 10–32), age 26.8 years (12.1, 16–58), and body mass index 23.2 (2.1, 19.3–26.9). There were 14 men (93%) and 1 woman (7%). There was a statistically significant improvement between pre- and postoperative periods for VAS for pain (p = 0.003), Lysholm score (p = 0.002), IKDC subjective form (p = 0.003), WOMAC for pain (p = 0.005), WOMAC for stiffness (p = 0.01), WOMAC for function (p = 0.002), Lequesne Index (p = 0.002), and SF-12 physical component summary (p = 0.007). The postoperative mean (SD; range) MOCART score was 70 (12.4; 40–85). Conclusions: The use of this novel cartilage restoration surgical technique provides excellent clinical, functional, and MRI-based outcomes in young, active individuals with full-thickness cartilage or osteochondral defects. Level of evidence: Level IV—Therapeutic case series.

[1]  H. Choudur,et al.  Arthroscopic and open treatment of cartilage lesions with BST-CARGEL scaffold and microfracture: A cohort study of consecutive patients. , 2019, The Knee.

[2]  C. Kaleka,et al.  Tratamento cirúrgico das lesões condrais do joelho com o uso da membrana de colágeno – condrogênese autóloga induzida por matriz , 2018, Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia.

[3]  C. C. Kaleka,et al.  Surgical treatment of chondral knee defects using a collagen membrane – autologus matrix-induced chondrogenesis☆ , 2018, Revista brasileira de ortopedia.

[4]  E. Alentorn-Geli,et al.  Cartilage regeneration using a novel autologous growth factors-based matrix for full-thickness defects in sheep , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  E. Alentorn-Geli,et al.  Treatment of Knee Osteochondral Lesions Using a Novel Clot of Autologous Plasma Rich in Growth Factors Mixed with Healthy Hyaline Cartilage Chips and Intra-Articular Injection of PRGF , 2017, Case reports in orthopedics.

[6]  K. Webster,et al.  Surgical treatments of cartilage defects of the knee: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. , 2017, The Knee.

[7]  V. Y. Moraes,et al.  Surgical interventions (microfracture, drilling, mosaicplasty, and allograft transplantation) for treating isolated cartilage defects of the knee in adults. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[8]  D. Wascher,et al.  Knee Articular Cartilage Repair and Restoration Techniques , 2015, Sports health.

[9]  M. Lind,et al.  Poor osteochondral repair by a biomimetic collagen scaffold: 1- to 3-year clinical and radiological follow-up , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[10]  V. Mlynárik,et al.  Morphological and compositional monitoring of a new cell-free cartilage repair hydrogel technology - GelrinC by MR using semi-quantitative MOCART scoring and quantitative T2 index and new zonal T2 index calculation. , 2015, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[11]  M. Lind,et al.  Autologous Dual-Tissue Transplantation for Osteochondral Repair , 2015, Cartilage.

[12]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Scaffold-based cartilage treatments: with or without cells? A systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence. , 2015, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[13]  J. Salinero,et al.  Injuries Among Spanish Male Amateur Soccer Players , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  K. L. Wong,et al.  Injectable cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in varus knees with cartilage defects undergoing high tibial osteotomy: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years' follow-up. , 2013, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[15]  Robert A Siston,et al.  Prevalence of chondral defects in athletes' knees: a systematic review. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  Herwig Imhof,et al.  Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, European journal of radiology.