Photon-Counting Detector CT With Denoising for Imaging of the Osseous Pelvis at Low Radiation Doses: A Phantom Study.

Background: Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT may allow lower radiation doses than used for conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, with preserved image quality. Objective: To compare PCD CT and EID CT, reconstructed with and without a denoising tool, in terms of image quality of the osseous pelvis in a phantom, with attention to low radiation doses. Methods: A pelvic phantom comprising human bones in acrylic material mimicking soft tissue underwent PCD CT and EID CT at various tube potentials and radiation doses ranging from 0.05 to 5 mGy. Additional denoised reconstructions were generated using a commercial tool. Noise was measured in the acrylic material. Two readers performed independent qualitative assessments that entailed determining the denoised EID CT reconstruction with the lowest acceptable dose and then comparing this reference reconstruction with PCD CT reconstructions without and with denoising, using subjective Likert scales. Results: Noise was lower for PCD CT than for EID CT. For instance, at 0.05 mGy and 100 kV with tin filter, noise was 38.4 HU for PCD CT versus 48.8 HU for EID CT. Denoising further reduced noise; for example, for PCD CT at 100 kV with tin filter at 0.25 mGy, noise was 19.9 HU without denoising versus 9.7 HU with denoising. For both readers, lowest acceptable dose for EID CT was 0.1 mGy (total score, 11 of 15 for both readers). Both readers somewhat agreed that PCD CT without denoising at 0.1 mGy (reflecting reference reconstruction dose) was relatively better than the reference reconstruction in terms of osseous structures, artifacts, and image quality. Both readers also somewhat agreed that denoised PCD CT reconstructions at 0.1 mGy and 0.05 mGy (reflecting matched and lower doses, respectively, with respect to reference reconstruction dose) were relatively better than the reference reconstruction for the image quality measures. Conclusion: PCD CT demonstrated better quality images than EID CT when performed at the lowest acceptable radiation dose for EID CT. PCD CT with denoising yielded better quality images at a dose lower than lowest acceptable dose for EID CT. Clinical Impact: PCD CT with denoising could facilitate lower radiation doses for pelvic imaging.

[1]  L. Devos,et al.  Image Quality Analysis of Photon-Counting CT Compared with Dual-Source CT: A Phantom Study for Chest CT Examinations , 2023, Diagnostics.

[2]  L. Pennig,et al.  Ultrahigh-resolution computed tomography of the cervical spine without dose penalty employing a cadmium-telluride photon-counting detector. , 2023, European journal of radiology.

[3]  C. McCollough,et al.  Photon-counting Detector CT with Deep Learning Noise Reduction to Detect Multiple Myeloma. , 2022, Radiology.

[4]  S. Leng,et al.  Photon-Counting Detector CT: Key Points Radiologists Should Know , 2022, Korean journal of radiology.

[5]  C. McCollough,et al.  Dedicated convolutional neural network for noise reduction in ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector computed tomography , 2022, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  C. McCollough,et al.  Improved visualization of the wrist at lower radiation dose with photon-counting-detector CT , 2022, Skeletal Radiology.

[7]  S. Bette,et al.  Visualization of bone details in a novel photon-counting dual-source CT scanner—comparison with energy-integrating CT , 2021, European Radiology.

[8]  T. Flohr,et al.  First Clinical Photon-counting Detector CT System: Technical Evaluation. , 2021, Radiology.

[9]  L. Lança,et al.  The use of deep learning towards dose optimization in low-dose computed tomography: A scoping review. , 2021, Radiography.

[10]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Pelvic bone CT: can tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT and virtual radiographs be used as alternative for standard CT and digital radiographs? , 2021, European Radiology.

[11]  Jayasai R. Rajagopal,et al.  Comparison of Low Dose Performance of Photon-Counting and Energy Integrating CT. , 2020, Academic radiology.

[12]  J. Beregi,et al.  CT iterative reconstruction algorithms: a task-based image quality assessment , 2019, European Radiology.

[13]  Jong Hyo Kim,et al.  Effect of a novel denoising technique on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in low-dose CT in patients with suspected appendicitis. , 2019, European journal of radiology.

[14]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Photon-counting Detector CT: System Design and Clinical Applications of an Emerging Technology. , 2019, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  A.W.K. Yeung,et al.  The “As Low As Reasonably Achievable” (ALARA) principle: a brief historical overview and a bibliometric analysis of the most cited publications , 2019, Radioprotection.

[16]  Amir Pourmorteza,et al.  Photon-counting CT: Technical Principles and Clinical Prospects. , 2018, Radiology.

[17]  Stefan Ulzheimer,et al.  Feasibility of Dose-reduced Chest CT with Photon-counting Detectors: Initial Results in Humans. , 2017, Radiology.

[18]  M. Uder,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in parasinus CT by spectral shaping , 2017, Neuroradiology.

[19]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Unenhanced third-generation dual-source chest CT using a tin filter for spectral shaping at 100kVp. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[20]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An Improved Index of Image Quality for Task-based Performance of CT Iterative Reconstruction across Three Commercial Implementations. , 2015, Radiology.

[21]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology. , 2014, Medical physics.

[22]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. , 2009, Medical physics.

[23]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. , 1999, Medical physics.

[24]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Impact of image denoising on image quality, quantitative parameters and sensitivity of ultra-low-dose volume perfusion CT imaging , 2015, European Radiology.