Pulpotomy of human primary molars with MTA and Portland cement: a randomised controlled trial
暂无分享,去创建一个
T. Oliveira | M. Machado | V. T. Sakai | A. B. S. Moretti | R. C. Abdo | C. F. Santos | T. M. Oliveira | A. P. C. Fornetti | C. Santos
[1] T. Oliveira,et al. PULPOTOMIES WITH PORTLAND CEMENT IN HUMAN PRIMARY MOLARS , 2009, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.
[2] T. Oliveira,et al. The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth. , 2008, International endodontic journal.
[3] D. Charlton,et al. Mineral trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[4] H. Duncan,et al. Histological, ultrastructural and quantitative investigations on the response of healthy human pulps to experimental capping with mineral trioxide aggregate: a randomized controlled trial , 2007, BDJ.
[5] T. Oliveira,et al. Mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy of a primary second molar in a patient with agenesis of the permanent successor. , 2007, International endodontic journal.
[6] G. De-Deus,et al. The use of white Portland cement as an apical plug in a tooth with a necrotic pulp and wide-open apex: a case report. , 2007, International endodontic journal.
[7] S. Dadvand,et al. Randomized controlled trial of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol for pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. , 2007, International endodontic journal.
[8] P. Lumley,et al. Effect of bismuth oxide radioopacifier content on the material properties of an endodontic Portland cement-based (MTA-like) system. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.
[9] Eun-Cheol Kim,et al. Human pulp cells response to Portland cement in vitro. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.
[10] M. Qudeimat,et al. A prospective clinical study of mineral trioxide aggregate for partial pulpotomy in cariously exposed permanent teeth , 2007, BDJ.
[11] F. Mante,et al. Chemical analysis of powder and set forms of Portland cement, gray ProRoot MTA, white ProRoot MTA, and gray MTA-Angelus. , 2006, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.
[12] J. Camilleri,et al. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a review of the constituents and biological properties of the material. , 2006, International endodontic journal.
[13] I. G. de Moraes,et al. Sealing ability of MTA and radiopaque Portland cement with or without calcium chloride for root-end filling. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.
[14] M. Qudeimat,et al. A prospective clinical study of mineral trioxide aggregate for partial pulpotomy in cariously exposed permanent teeth. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.
[15] G. De-Deus,et al. MTA versus Portland cement as repair material for furcal perforations: a laboratory study using a polymicrobial leakage model. , 2006, International endodontic journal.
[16] A. Yap,et al. Comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of MTA and portland cement. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.
[17] H. Gerth,et al. A comparative study of selected properties of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and two Portland cements. , 2006, International endodontic journal.
[18] V. Chacko,et al. Human pulpal response to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA): a histologic study. , 2006, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.
[19] A. Crispin,et al. Effectiveness of 4 Pulpotomy Techniques—Randomized Controlled Trial , 2005, Journal of dental research.
[20] P. Planells,et al. Dentin bridge formation after mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomies in primary teeth. , 2005, American journal of dentistry.
[21] M. Kuga,et al. Arsenic release provided by MTA and Portland cement. , 2005, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.
[22] G. Holan,et al. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. , 2005, Pediatric dentistry.
[23] N. Alamoudi,et al. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. , 2005, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.
[24] A. Khademi,et al. SUCCESS RATE OF FORMOCRESOL PULPOTOMY VERSUS MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE IN HUMAN PRIMARY MOLAR TOOTH , 2004 .
[25] C. Bramante,et al. Histologic evaluation of pulpotomies in dog using two types of mineral trioxide aggregate and regular and white Portland cements as wound dressings. , 2004, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.
[26] D. Avery,et al. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. , 2004, Pediatric dentistry.
[27] M. Torabinejad. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 1999, The Alpha omegan.
[28] G. Mount,et al. Glass ionomers in contemporary restorative dentistry--a clinical update. , 2003, Journal of the California Dental Association.
[29] Qiang Zhu,et al. Cell and tissue reactions to mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.
[30] A. Fuks. Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. , 2002, European journal of paediatric dentistry.
[31] R. Holland,et al. Healing process of dog dental pulp after pulpotomy and pulp covering with mineral trioxide aggregate or Portland cement. , 2001, Brazilian dental journal.
[32] D. Odont,et al. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. , 2001, Pediatric dentistry.
[33] J. Whitworth,et al. Primary molar pulp therapy--histological evaluation of failure. , 2008, International journal of paediatric dentistry.
[34] D. Ranly,et al. Current and potential pulp therapies for primary and young permanent teeth. , 2000, Journal of dentistry.
[35] J. D. PÉcora,et al. Antimicrobial and chemical study of MTA, Portland cement, calcium hydroxide paste, Sealapex and Dycal. , 2000, Brazilian dental journal.
[36] C. Fenske. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models. , 2000, Brazilian dental journal.
[37] A. Wucherpfennig,et al. PR 40 Mineral Trioxide vs. Portland Cement: Two biocompatible filling materials , 1999 .