The Usability Study of a Proposed Environmental Experience Design Framework for Active Ageing

Growing ageing population today may be necessitating building design decision makers to reconsider the indoor environmental quality (IEQ) standards in a way that accommodates senior occupants’ diverse and individual needs and demands. An experience design approach to rationalising and individualising end-user experience on how to utilise tangible products may serve to reflect user perceptions. Generally, architectural design practices tend to incorporate neither IEQ monitoring and analysis data, nor environmental experience design today. In response to the need for filling this gap, the authors of this paper conducted a feasibility study previously that led to structuring and defining an ‘Environmental Experience Design’ (EXD) research framework. Based on the previous case study on the collective spatial analysis and IEQ monitoring results, this paper further explored the usability and applicability of this proposed EXD framework particularly to the previously documented aged care facility in Victoria, Australia, which has been stressing active ageing agendas. This EXD framework usability experiment helped to build the capacity for engaging the subjectivity and objectivity of end users’ expectations, desires, and requirements in the architectural design thinking process. Nonetheless, due to the limitation of this initial and fundamental usability study’s resources and the objective, the necessity of adjusting the scale and scope of EXD analyses emerged. Moreover, the universality of this EXD research framework usage under various architectural typologies and user conditions yet require further attempts and investigations.

[1]  Ann Bowling,et al.  Enhancing later life: How older people perceive active ageing? , 2008, Aging & mental health.

[2]  Masa Noguchi,et al.  Structuring the Environmental Experience Design Research Framework through Selected Aged Care Facility Data Analyses in Victoria , 2017 .

[3]  B. Joseph Pine,et al.  The Experience Economy , 1999 .

[4]  H. Kerschner,et al.  Productive aging: a quality of life agenda. , 1998, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[5]  H. Wilms,et al.  Daily life in very old age: everyday activities as expression of successful living. , 1998, The Gerontologist.

[6]  N. Krause Neighborhood deterioration, religious coping, and changes in health during late life. , 1998, The Gerontologist.

[7]  A. Bowling,et al.  What is successful ageing and who should define it? , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  J. Rowe,et al.  Successful aging. , 1997, The Gerontologist.

[9]  Michele De Carli,et al.  Indoor environmental quality and pupil perception in Italian primary schools , 2012 .

[10]  Steve Iliffe,et al.  Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing. , 2006, Age and ageing.

[11]  M. Nash The policy framework , 2008 .

[12]  R. Dubos The wooing of Earth , 1980 .

[13]  A. Kalache,et al.  Active ageing: a policy framework. , 2003, Advances in gerontology = Uspekhi gerontologii.

[14]  Stephen R. Kellert,et al.  Kinship to Mastery: Biophilia In Human Evolution And Development , 1997 .

[15]  Mohammed Arif,et al.  Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature , 2016 .

[16]  Richard Wener,et al.  Planning the built environment: Programming , 2016 .

[17]  C. Browning,et al.  Positive ageing: facts and opportunities , 1997, The Medical journal of Australia.

[18]  Alphonse J. Dell'Isola,et al.  Value engineering : practical applications --for design, construction, maintenance & operations , 1997 .