Comparative study of corneal tangent elastic modulus measurement using corneal indentation device.

The aim of this study is to examine the corneal tangent modulus measurement repeatability and performance of the corneal indentation device (CID). Twenty enucleated porcine eyes were measured and the eyes were pressurized using saline solution-filled manometer to 15 and 30 mmHg. Corneal tangent moduli measured using the CID were compared with those measured using high precision universal testing machine (UTM). The within-subject standard deviation (Sw), repeatability (2.77×Sw), coefficient of variation (CV) (Sw/overall mean), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were determined. The mean corneal tangent moduli measured using UTM and CID were 0.094±0.030 and 0.094±0.028 MPa at 15 mmHg, and 0.207±0.056 and 0.207±0.055 MPa at 30 mmHg, respectively, with a difference less than 0.13%. The 95% limit of agreement was between -0.009 and 0.009 MPa. The Sw, repeatability, CV and ICC of corneal tangent moduli measured by the CID were 0.006 MPa, 0.015 MPa, 4.3% and 0.993, respectively. The results showed that the corneal tangent moduli measured by the CID are repeatable and are in good agreement with the results measured by the high precision UTM.

[1]  Ying Yang,et al.  An Indentation Technique to Characterize the Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Human and Porcine Corneas , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  J. Lace,et al.  A comparison of the elastic properties of human choroid and sclera. , 1988, Experimental eye research.

[3]  C. Leung,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of scleral stiffness and tangent modulus in porcine eyes. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Ahmed Elsheikh,et al.  Comparative study of corneal strip extensometry and inflation tests , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  T. Seiler,et al.  Stress‐strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin–ultraviolet‐A‐induced cross‐linking , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  R. Jones,et al.  Full-field deformation of bovine cornea under constrained inflation conditions. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[7]  R. Birngruber,et al.  Thermal and Biomechanical Parameters of Porcine Cornea , 2000, Cornea.

[8]  Trygve Saude Ocular Anatomy and Physiology , 1993 .

[9]  D. Hoeltzel,et al.  Strip Extensiometry for Comparison of the Mechanical Response of Bovine, Rabbit, and Human Corneas , 1992 .

[10]  D. Pye,et al.  Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[11]  David C. Pye,et al.  Young’s Modulus in Normal Corneas and the Effect on Applanation Tonometry , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  A. Elsheikh,et al.  Assessment of Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Their Variation with Age , 2007, Current eye research.

[13]  J. Hjortdal,et al.  Extensibility of the normo-hydrated human cornea. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[14]  Jun Liu,et al.  A quantitative ultrasonic spectroscopy method for noninvasive determination of corneal biomechanical properties. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  H. Kasprzak,et al.  Measurement of Elastic Modulus of the Bovine Cornea by Means of Holographic Interferometry. Part 1. Method and Experiment , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  David C C Lam,et al.  Partial contact indentation tonometry for measurement of corneal properties-independent intraocular pressure. , 2012, Molecular & cellular biomechanics : MCB.

[17]  A. Elsheikh,et al.  Characterization of age-related variation in corneal biomechanical properties , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[18]  Kevin Anderson,et al.  Application of structural analysis to the mechanical behaviour of the cornea , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  R. Stein,et al.  The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  B K Pierscionek,et al.  The elasticity and rigidity of the outer coats of the eye , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[21]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Repeatability and Reproducibility of Goldmann Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Ocular Response Analyzer Tonometry , 2013, Journal of glaucoma.

[22]  R P Vito,et al.  The distribution of strain in the human cornea. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  J O Hjortdal,et al.  Regional elastic performance of the human cornea. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  W. A. Schlegel,et al.  Nonlinear material properties of intact cornea and sclera. , 1972, Experimental eye research.

[25]  David C C Lam,et al.  Characterization of corneal tangent modulus in vivo , 2013, Acta ophthalmologica.

[26]  B K Pierscionek,et al.  The effect of changing intraocular pressure on the corneal and scleral curvatures in the fresh porcine eye , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[27]  Jun Liu,et al.  Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: Quantitative analysis , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[28]  Ahmed Elsheikh,et al.  Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  L. Portney,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research , 1993 .

[30]  Aachal Kotecha,et al.  What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? , 2007, Survey of ophthalmology.

[31]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[32]  B. Boyce,et al.  Stress-controlled viscoelastic tensile response of bovine cornea. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  E. Spoerl,et al.  Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[34]  M. R. Bryant,et al.  Constitutive laws for biomechanical modeling of refractive surgery. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[35]  D. Maurice,et al.  The mechanical properties of the rabbit and human cornea. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Mathias Fink,et al.  High-Resolution Quantitative Imaging of Cornea Elasticity Using Supersonic Shear Imaging , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  A. Lam,et al.  The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[38]  A. Elsheikh,et al.  Biomechanical properties of human and porcine corneas. , 2008, Experimental eye research.

[39]  N. Ehlers,et al.  APPLANATION TONOMETRY AND CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS , 1975, Acta ophthalmologica.

[40]  M. Doughty,et al.  Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. , 2000, Survey of ophthalmology.