Investigation of the effect of ambient lighting on contrast sensitivity using a novel method for conducting visual research on LCDS.

The DICOM part 14 greyscale standard display function provides one way of harmonising image appearance under different monitor luminance settings. This function is based on ideal observer conditions, where the eye is always adapted to the target luminance and thereby also at peak contrast sensitivity. Clinical workstations are, however, often submitted to variations in ambient light due to a sub-optimal reading room light environment. Also, clinical images are inhomogeneous and low-contrast patterns must be detected even at luminance levels that differ from the eye adaptation level. All deviations from ideal luminance conditions cause the observer to detect patterns with reduced eye sensitivity but the magnitude of this reduction is unclear. A method is presented to display well-defined sinusoidal low-contrast test patterns on an liquid crystal display. The observers were exposed to light from three different areas: (i) the test pattern covering approximately 2 degrees x 2 degrees; (ii) the remaining of the display surface and (iii) ambient light from outside the display area covering most of the observers' field of view. By adjusting the luminance from each of these three areas, the observers' ability to detect low-contrast patterns under sub-optimal viewing conditions was studied. Ambient light from outside the display area has a moderate effect on the contrast threshold, except for the combination of high ambient light and dark objects, where the contrast threshold increased considerably.

[1]  Patrik Sund,et al.  Calibration of diagnostic monitors: Theoretical determination of optimal luminance settings , 2006 .

[2]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Can radiologists recognize that a computer has identified cancers that they have overlooked? , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Physical model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Patrik Sund,et al.  Generation of low‐contrast sinusoidal test patterns on a high‐brightness display , 2006 .

[5]  Micheal Evanoff,et al.  Optimum ambient lighting conditions for the viewing of softcopy radiological images , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Patrik Sund,et al.  A comparison between 8-bit and 10-bit luminance resolution when generating low-contrast sinusoidal test pattern on an LCD , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Front Matter: Volume 6515 , 2007 .

[8]  D. Dudis,et al.  Computational model to predict two-photon absorption resonances , 1997 .

[9]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Ambient illumination revisited: a new adaptation-based approach for optimizing medical imaging reading environments. , 2006, Medical physics.

[10]  Patrik Sund,et al.  Detection of low contrast test patterns on an LCD with different luminance and illuminance settings , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  W L Makous,et al.  Fourier models and the loci of adaptation. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  G. Legge.  A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[13]  A. Burgess.  Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[14]  Luigi Albani,et al.  Grayscale standard display function on LCD color monitors , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  Michael J. Flynn,et al.  2AFC assessment of contrast threshold for a standardized target using a monochrome LCD monitor , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Formula for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  How to minimize perceptual error and maximize expertise in medical imaging , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.