Quality of health answers in social Q&A

The purpose of the current study is to investigate perceptions regarding the quality of online health answers in social Q&A. The current study differs from previous studies by focusing on the topic of health, comparing the evaluations of users against experts. Three groups of participants -- librarians, nurses, and users of Yahoo! Answers -- were invited to assess the quality of health answers posted in Yahoo! Answers. Forty participants from each group reviewed a total of 400 health answers, rating them with a 5-points Likert scale according to 10 evaluation criteria: accuracy, completeness, relevance, objectivity, source credibility, readability, politeness, confidence, knowledge, and efforts. Findings indicated that there was no significant difference of the quality ratings between librarians and nurses. There was, however, significant difference between those two expert groups (librarians and nurses) and users. Librarians and nurses rated the quality of answers lower on most of the evaluation criteria than users. This research will help librarians and nurses better understand how laypeople, such as their patrons and patients, evaluate online health information in social contexts, leading to the offering of better health information services to these audiences.

[1]  Sanghee Oh,et al.  Evaluating health answers in a social Q&A site , 2009, ASIST.

[2]  John Renner,et al.  Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[3]  Iryna Gurevych,et al.  A Multi-Dimensional Model for Assessing the Quality of Answers in Social Q&A Sites , 2009, ICIQ.

[4]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Empathic communities: balancing emotional and factual communication , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[5]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[6]  Flis Henwood,et al.  "I'm Not Sure If That's What Their Job Is": Consumer Health Information and Emerging "Healthwork" Roles in the Public Library , 2010 .

[7]  Sanghee Oh,et al.  Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Mary L. Gillaspy,et al.  Factors Affecting the Provision of Consumer Health Information in Public Libraries: The Last Five Years , 2005, Libr. Trends.

[9]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  A model for online consumer health information quality , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites , 2008, CHI.

[11]  Lynda M. Baker,et al.  The Medical Library Association guide to health literacy , 2008 .

[12]  Samuel T.C. Thompson,et al.  Skeptical Medical Reference: Helping Patrons Find Critical Resources for Consumer Health Issues , 2007 .

[13]  Soojung Kim,et al.  Questioners' credibility judgments of answers in a social question and answer site , 2010, Inf. Res..

[14]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Predicting information seeker satisfaction in community question answering , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[15]  Elizabeth Orban,et al.  Health Literacy: Challenges and Implications for Consumer Health Librarians , 2005 .

[16]  Jeffrey Pomerantz,et al.  Evaluating and predicting answer quality in community QA , 2010, SIGIR.

[17]  A. Risk,et al.  e-Health Code of Ethics (May 24) , 2000, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  Arlene Lawson.  Leaving Stalag 17 , 2002 .

[19]  Marcus A. Banks.  The Medical Library Association Guide to Health Literacy | The Medical Library Association Guide to Health Literacy, Marge Kars, Lynda M. Baker, Feleta L. Wilson (Eds.), Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc., New York (2008), 314 p. $75.00, ISBN: 978-1-55570-625-8 , 2009 .

[20]  Kim Soojung,et al.  Questioners' credibility judgments of answers in a social question and answer site , 2010 .