Drilling Fluid Considerations in Design of Engineered Horizontal Directional Drilling Installations

A literature review is presented that identifies a number of areas where procedures for the engineering design of bored installations in soil using horizontal directional drilling (HDD) can be improved through a more realistic consideration of drilling fluid drag effects and skin friction coefficients. The current HDD practice of calculating annular frictional pressure loss caused by drilling fluid drag based on the assumption of concentric annular flow of a Bingham plastic fluid is demonstrated to be overly conservative. Consequently, critical design parameters, such as depth of cover, which affects crossing length, and drilling equipment size, which is selected based on anticipated pulling load, cannot be optimized. This can result in overly conservative design and unnecessary construction costs. Parameter values currently employed in HDD pulling load prediction are challenged suggesting that the viscous shear of drilling fluid is significantly less than typically quoted and that the friction coefficients often employed are not representative of all skin friction effects in HDD. A new real-time monitoring cell for large-scale HDD is described that can be used to optimize installations and to assess and update current prediction models.

[1]  T. Hemphill,et al.  Yield-power law model more accurately predicts mud rheology , 1993 .

[2]  E. E. Maidla,et al.  Field Comparison of 2-D and 3-D Methods for the Borehole Friction Evaluation in Directional Wells , 1987 .

[3]  J. G. Potyondy Skin Friction between Various Soils and Construction Materials , 1961 .

[4]  C. Nalluri,et al.  Nalluri & Featherstone's Civil Engineering Hydraulics : essential theory with worked examples , 1995 .

[5]  J. J. Azar,et al.  Correlations of mud rheological properties with cuttings-transport performance in directional drilling , 1991 .

[6]  Carlos A. Latorre,et al.  Installation of Fiber-Optic Cables Under Flood-Protection Structures Using Horizontal Directional Drilling Techniques , 2002 .

[7]  Andrew K. Wojtanowicz,et al.  Laboratory study of borehole friction factor with a dynamic-filtration apparatus , 1990 .

[8]  R C Conner HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPES , 1998 .

[9]  M. Haciislamoglu,et al.  Non-Newtonian Flow in Eccentric Annuli , 1990 .

[10]  Erez N. Allouche,et al.  Methods for Estimating Pipe Pullback Loads for Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Crossings , 2002 .

[11]  Dulcy M. Abraham,et al.  A decision support system for horizontal directional drilling , 2003 .

[12]  Hugh W. O'Donnell,et al.  Installation of pipelines beneath levees using horizontal directional drilling , 1998 .

[13]  Guk-Rwang Won American Society for Testing and Materials , 1987 .

[14]  Erez N. Allouche,et al.  Experimental investigation of pull loads and borehole pressures during horizontal directional drilling installations , 2004 .

[15]  Wilson C. Chin Computational rheology for pipeline and annular flow , 2001 .

[16]  B. Keulen,et al.  Maximum allowable pressures during horizontal directional drillings focused on sand , 2001 .

[17]  D. P. Huey,et al.  Installation loading and stress analysis involved with pipelines installed by horizontal directional drilling , 1996 .

[18]  John D. Hair Analysis of Subsurface Pressures Involved with Directionally Controlled Horizontal Drilling , 1991 .

[19]  L. Piga,et al.  Mechanical and leaching properties of cement solidified hospital solid-waste incinerator fly-ash , 1998 .