Experimental evidence for optimal and minimal metrical structure of German word prosody

In the present paper a constraint-based description of German word prosody is suggested in which the constraint ranking is in crucial parts supported empirically by experimental findings from a pseudoword production task and from studies using electrophysiological measurements. It is shown how stress patterns of existing German words as well as experimental results on diverse prosodic structures can be expressed by minimal violations of prosodic constraints. In this way, our analysis aims to gain more insights into the question, which metrical structures are least marked in German. Furthermore, an aspect of minimality in metrical systems is considered, which regards the structure of metrical feet in German. Can we establish strict binarity of feet or do we find evidence for ternary structures?

[1]  M. Halle,et al.  An essay on stress , 1987 .

[2]  Johannes Knaus,et al.  THE PROCESSING OF WORD STRESS: EEG STUDIES ON TASK-RELATED COMPONENTS , 2007 .

[3]  Birgit Alber,et al.  Stress Preservation in German Loan-words , 2007 .

[4]  Erika Kaltenbacher.  Typologische Aspekte des Wortakzents , 1994 .

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005) , 2006 .

[6]  T. Vennemann.  Skizze der deutschen Wortprosodie , 1991 .

[7]  Peter Eisenberg,et al.  Syllabische Struktur und Wortakzent. Prinzipien der Prosodik deutscher Wörter , 1991 .

[8]  Ulrike Janßen.  Untersuchungen zum Wortakzent im Deutschen und Niederländischen , 2004 .

[9]  C. Féry.  German Word Stress in Optimality Theory , 1998 .

[10]  R. Kager.  A Metrical Theory of Stress and Destressing in English and Dutch , 1989 .

[11]  B. Hayes.  A metrical theory of stress rules , 1980 .

[12]  Mathias Scharinger,et al.  Minimal representations of alternating vowels , 2009 .

[13]  René Kager,et al.  Ternary rhythm in alignment theory , 1995 .

[14]  Richard Wiese,et al.  The Phonology of German , 1996 .

[15]  Peter Eisenberg,et al.  Silbenphonologie des Deutschen , 1992 .

[16]  Joe Pater.  Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints , 2000, Phonology.

[17]  Geert Booij,et al.  Yearbook of Morphology 1993 , 1993 .

[18]  A. Zwicky,et al.  The handbook of morphology , 2001 .

[19]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  The Prosody Of Phase In Rotuman , 2000 .

[20]  No Value.  Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences , 2000 .

[21]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Minimality as vacuous distinctness: Evidence from cross-linguistic sentence comprehension , 2009 .

[22]  Marc Pierce,et al.  Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe , 2000 .

[23]  B. Hayes.  Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies , 1995 .

[24]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[25]  Frank Domahs,et al.  Going on with optimised feet: Evidence for the interaction between segmental and metrical structure in phonological encoding from a case of primary progressive aphasia , 2008 .

[26]  B. Alber.  Quantity Sensitivity as the Result of Constraint Interaction , 1997 .

[27]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[28]  Luigi Burzio.  Principles of English Stress , 1995 .

[29]  Richard Wiese,et al.  Phonology and morphology of the Germanic languages , 1998 .

[30]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.