Background Sound Impairs Interruption Recovery in Dynamic Task Situations: Procedural Conflict?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dario D. Salvucci,et al. Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.
[2] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Auditory babble and cognitive efficiency: Role of number of voices and their location , 1995 .
[3] E. M. Altmann,et al. Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: Data and a model , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[4] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Role of Habituation in the Irrelevant Sound Effect: Evidence From the Effects of Token Set Size and Rate of Transition , 1998 .
[5] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Interruption of the Tower of London task: support for a goal-activation approach. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[6] M Rahimi,et al. A field evaluation of driver eye and head movement strategies toward environmental targets and distractors. , 1990, Applied ergonomics.
[7] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition Broken Expectations : Violation of Expectancies , Not Novelty , Captures Auditory Attention , 2011 .
[8] Dylan M. Jones,et al. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[9] Linden J. Ball,et al. Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. , 2006 .
[10] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Auditory Distraction and Short-Term Memory: Phenomena and Practical Implications , 2001, Hum. Factors.
[11] Jean-Paul Imbert,et al. LABY: Un support d'aide à l'évaluation de choix de conception d'IHM pour le contrôle aérien , 2012, Ergo'IHM.
[12] J. Gregory Trafton,et al. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[13] Erich Schrger,et al. A Neural Mechanism for Involuntary Attention Shifts to Changes in Auditory Stimulation , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[14] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Privileged Access by Irrelevant Speech to Short-term Memory: The Role of Changing State , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[15] E. Elliott,et al. The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change , 2002, Memory & cognition.
[16] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] Roger Remington,et al. Prospective memory in dynamic environments: Effects of load, delay, and phonological rehearsal , 2001, Memory.
[18] Linden J. Ball,et al. Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research : Current Status and Future Prospects , 2004 .
[19] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[20] D. Berry,et al. Disruption of office‐related tasks by speech and office noise , 1998 .
[21] Harvey S. Smallman,et al. Recovery from Interruptions to a Dynamic Monitoring Task: The Beguiling Utility of Instant Replay , 2005 .
[22] M. Just,et al. Eye fixations and cognitive processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.
[23] Sébastien Tremblay,et al. Using auditory streaming to reduce disruption to serial memory by extraneous auditory warnings. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[24] Harvey S. Smallman,et al. Staying Up to Speed: Four Design Principles for Maintaining and Recovering Situation Awareness , 2008 .
[25] Daniel Lafond,et al. Decision Analysis Using Policy Capturing and Process Tracing Techniques in a Simulated Naval Air-Defense Task , 2009 .
[26] Raj M. Ratwani,et al. Spatial memory guides task resumption , 2008 .
[27] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction , 2009, Cognition.
[28] Dirk Schaefer,et al. The effects of party line communication on flight task performance , 2005 .
[29] Daniel Gartenberg,et al. Situation Awareness Reacquisition in a Supervisory Control Task , 2011 .
[30] Joseph H. Goldberg,et al. Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs , 1999 .
[31] Mark W. Wiggins,et al. Polychronicity and Information Acquisition in Pilot Decision Making , 2008 .
[32] Julie A Fiez,et al. Evaluating models of working memory through the effects of concurrent irrelevant information. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[33] Niels Taatgen,et al. Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: from concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption , 2009, CHI.
[34] Harvey S. Smallman,et al. Chex (Change History Explicit): New HCI Concepts for Change Awareness , 2003 .
[35] Scott Makeig,et al. Eye Activity Correlates of Workload during a Visuospatial Memory Task , 2001, Hum. Factors.
[36] Gary Lupyan,et al. Overheard Cell-Phone Conversations , 2010, Psychological science.
[37] C. Philip Beaman,et al. Auditory distraction from low‐intensity noise: a review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments , 2005 .
[38] F. Barceló,et al. Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change , 2011, Cognition.
[39] Mica R. Endsley,et al. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.
[40] Simon P. Banbury,et al. 'Irrelevant Sound Effect': The effects of extraneous sounds on aircrew performance , 1999 .
[41] Christopher A. Monk,et al. A Process-Model Account of Task Interruption and Resumption: When Does Encoding of the Problem State Occur? , 2009 .
[42] Daniel Lafond,et al. Supporting situation awareness: A tradeoff between benefits and overhead , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).
[43] S. Hart,et al. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .
[44] E. M. Altmann,et al. Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[45] M. A. Recarte,et al. Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[46] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Disruption of verbal-spatial serial memory by extraneous air-traffic speech , 2012 .
[47] R. Näätänen. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[48] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[49] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .
[50] J. Gregory Trafton,et al. Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..
[51] C. Lebiere,et al. The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .
[52] R. Key Dismukes,et al. Remembrance of Things Future: Prospective Memory in Laboratory, Workplace, and Everyday Settings , 2010 .
[53] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Role of Serial Order in the Irrelevant Speech Effect: Tests of the Changing-State Hypothesis , 1997 .
[54] N. Cowan. Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .
[55] Christopher A. Monk,et al. Recovering From Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research , 2004, Hum. Factors.
[56] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000) , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[57] Sébastien Tremblay,et al. Supporting Change Detection in Complex Dynamic Situations: Does the CHEX Serve its Purpose? , 2012 .
[58] Dylan Marc Jones. The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: The 1997 BPS Broadbent Lecture , 1999 .
[59] Nigel Holt,et al. Reverberant auditory environments: the effects of multiple echoes on distraction by ‘irrelevant’ speech , 2007 .
[60] Daniel Lafond,et al. A Cognitive and Holistic Approach to Developing Metrics for Decision Support Incommand and Control , 2010 .
[61] Earl S Stein. EVALUATING AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER WORKLOAD USING REAL-TIME PERSON IN THE LOOP SIMULATION. , 1991 .
[62] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: the role of associative activation. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[63] J. Trafton,et al. The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[64] Daniel Lafond,et al. Dealing With Task Interruptions in Complex Dynamic Environments , 2012, Hum. Factors.
[65] Daniel J. Callan. Eye Movement Relationships to Excessive Performance Error in Aviation , 1998 .
[66] Wayne D. Gray,et al. Argus: A suite of tools for research in complex cognition , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[67] Avi Parush,et al. Where Did they Go? Recovering Dynamic Objects after Interruptions , 2010 .
[68] Simon Banbury,et al. The role of rehearsal in a novel call center-type task. , 2012, Noise & health.
[69] Tommy Strandvall,et al. Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research , 2009, INTERACT.
[70] Sophia L. King,et al. Improving memory after interruption: exploiting soft constraints and manipulating information access cost. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[71] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Indispensable benefits and unavoidable costs of unattended sound for cognitive functioning. , 2003, Noise & health.
[72] Stacey D. Scott,et al. Assisting Interruption Recovery in Supervisory Control of Multiple Uavs , 2006 .
[73] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Nonexplicit Change Detection in Complex Dynamic Settings , 2012, Hum. Factors.
[74] Dario D. Salvucci. On reconstruction of task context after interruption , 2010, CHI.
[75] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Do realistic reverberation levels reduce auditory distraction , 2007 .
[76] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect : Implications for phonological coding in working memory , 1993 .
[77] Raj M. Ratwani,et al. The Effect of Interruption Modality on Primary Task Resumption , 2008 .
[78] Dianne C. Berry,et al. Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise , 1997 .
[79] F. Parmentier. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing , 2008, Cognition.
[80] Wayne D. Gray. Simulated task environments: The role of high-fidelity simulations, scaled worlds, synthetic environments, and laboratory tasks in basic and applied cognitive research. , 2002 .
[81] Raj M. Ratwani,et al. An Eye Movement Analysis of the Effect of Interruption Modality on Primary Task Resumption , 2010, Hum. Factors.
[82] Sarah Sharples,et al. Changing the role of the air traffic controller: how will free flight affect memory for spatial events? , 2007, Applied ergonomics.