Predicting roadheader performance by using artificial neural network

With growing use of roadheaders in the world and its significant role in the successful accomplishment of a tunneling project, it is a necessity to accurately predict performance of this machine in different ground conditions. On the other hand, the existence of some shortcomings in the prediction models has made it necessary to perform more research on the development of the new models. This paper makes an attempt to model the rate of roadheader performance based on the geotechnical and geological site conditions. For achieving the aim, an artificial neural network (ANN), a powerful tool for modeling and recognizing the sophisticated structures involved in data, is employed to model the relationship between the roadheader performance and the parameters influencing the tunneling operations with a high correlation. The database used in modeling is compiled from laboratory studies conducted at Azad University at Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran. A model with architecture 4-10-1 trained by back-propagation algorithm is found to be optimum. A multiple variable regression (MVR) analysis is also applied to compare performance of the neural network. The results demonstrate that predictive capability of the ANN model is better than that of the MVR model. It is concluded that roadheader performance could be accurately predicted as a function of unconfined compressive strength, Brazilian tensile strength, rock quality designation, and alpha angle R2 = 0.987. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the most effective parameter on roadheader performance is the unconfined compressive strength.

[1]  H. Ergin,et al.  Estimation of Rock Cuttability from Shore Hardness and Compressive Strength Properties , 2007 .

[2]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Neural networks and fuzzy systems: a dynamical systems approach to machine intelligence , 1991 .

[3]  Nuh Bilgin,et al.  ROADHEADERS GLEAN VALUABLE TIPS FOR ISTANBUL METRO , 1990 .

[4]  S. Chehreh Chelgani,et al.  Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity for Travertine samples using regression and artificial neural networks , 2010 .

[5]  O. Acaroglu,et al.  The effect of machine design parameters on the stability of a roadheader , 2007 .

[6]  H. Copur,et al.  Dominant rock properties affecting the performance of conical picks and the comparison of some experimental and theoretical results , 2006 .

[7]  Saffet Yagiz,et al.  Utilizing rock mass properties for predicting TBM performance in hard rock condition , 2008 .

[8]  Timothy J. Ross,et al.  Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications: Ross/Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 2010 .

[9]  Kamran Goshtasbi,et al.  Predictive Models for Roadheaders' Cutting Performance in Coal Measure Rocks , 2011 .

[10]  T. Ross.  Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[11]  I. Burhan Türksen,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty with Fuzzy Logic - With Recent Theory and Applications , 2009, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[12]  R. Fowell,et al.  Cuttability Assessment Applied to Drag Tool Tunnelling Machines , 1991 .

[13]  Masoud Monjezi,et al.  Prediction of rock fragmentation due to blasting using artificial neural network , 2011, Engineering with Computers.

[14]  Bulent Tiryaki,et al.  Predicting intact rock strength for mechanical excavation using multivariate statistics, artificial neural networks, and regression trees , 2008 .

[15]  Mostafa Sharifzadeh,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks and multivariate statistics to estimate UCS using textural characteristics , 2012 .

[16]  S. Sumathi,et al.  Computational Intelligence Paradigms: Theory & Applications using MATLAB , 2010 .

[17]  Gholamnejad Javad,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks to the prediction of tunnel boring machine penetration rate , 2010 .

[18]  Ebru Akcapinar Sezer,et al.  Application of two non-linear prediction tools to the estimation of tunnel boring machine performance , 2009, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[19]  M. Monjezi,et al.  Evaluation of boring machine performance with special reference to geomechanical characteristics , 2009 .

[20]  Satar Mahdevari,et al.  Prediction of tunnel convergence using Artificial Neural Networks , 2012 .

[21]  Masoud Monjezi,et al.  Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural networks , 2011 .

[22]  Wu Qiong,et al.  Mean particle size prediction in rock blast fragmentation using neural networks , 2010 .

[23]  M. Grima,et al.  Application of neural networks for the prediction of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) from Equotip hardness , 1999 .

[24]  Ratan Raj Tatiya.  Surface and Underground Excavations: Methods, Techniques and Equipment , 2005 .

[25]  Masoud Monjezi,et al.  Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam, Iran, by artificial neural network , 2012, Neural Computing and Applications.

[26]  Patrick K. Simpson,et al.  Artificial Neural Systems: Foundations, Paradigms, Applications, and Implementations , 1990 .

[27]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Using an integrated model for shaft sinking method selection , 2011 .

[28]  Kourosh Shahriar,et al.  A new coal pillars design method in order to enhance safety of the retreat mining in room and pillar mines , 2012 .

[29]  T. N. Singh,et al.  An intelligent approach to prediction and control ground vibration in mines , 2005 .

[30]  H. Copur,et al.  Roadheader applications in mining and tunneling industries , 2000 .

[31]  Masoud Monjezi,et al.  Prediction and controlling of flyrock in blasting operation using artificial neural network , 2011 .

[32]  T. N. Singh,et al.  Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural network , 2009 .

[33]  Kourosh Shahriar,et al.  A model to predict the performance of roadheaders based on the Rock Mass Brittleness Index , 2011 .

[34]  Kurosch Thuro.  PREDICTING ROADHEADER ADVANCE RATES: GEOLOGICAL CHALLENGES AND GEOTECHNICAL ANSWERS , 2003 .