Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).

Amorphous silicon/cesium iodide (a-Si:H/CsI:Tl) flat-panel (FP)-based full-field digital mammography systems have recently become commercially available for clinical use. Some investigations on physical properties and imaging characteristics of these types of detectors have been conducted and reported. In this perception study, a phantom containing simulated microcalcifications (microCs) of various sizes was imaged with four detector systems: a FP system, a small field-of-view charge coupled device (CCD) system, a high resolution computed radiography (CR) system, and a conventional mammography screen/film (SF) system. The images were reviewed by mammographers as well as nonradiologist participants. Scores reflecting confidence ratings were given and recorded for each detection task. The results were used to determine the average confidence-rating scores for the four imaging systems. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was also performed to evaluate and compare the overall detection accuracy for the four detector systems. For calcifications of 125-140 microm in size, the FP system was found to have the best performance with the highest confidence-rating scores and the greatest detection accuracy (Az = 0.9) in the ROC analysis. The SF system was ranked second while the CCD system outperformed the CR system. The p values obtained by applying a Student t-test to the results of the ROC analysis indicate that the differences between any two systems are statistically significant (p<0.005). Differences in microC detectability for the large (150-160 microm) and small (112-125 microm) size microC groups showed a wider range of p values (not all p values are smaller than 0.005, ranging from 0.6 to <0.001) compared to the p values obtained for the medium (125-140 microm) size microC group. Using the p values to assess the statistical significance, the use of the average confidence-rating scores was not as significant as the use of the ROC analysis p value for p value.

[1]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Components-of-variance models for random-effects ROC analysis: the case of unequal variance structures across modalities. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[2]  Chris C. Shaw,et al.  Comparison of a-Si:H/CsI flat-panel digital imaging systems with CR-and CCD-based systems: image quality measurements , 2001 .

[3]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  DQE of direct and indirect digital radiography systems , 2001 .

[4]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Cone-beam volume CT mammographic imaging: feasibility study , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  Paul Leblans,et al.  New needle-crystalline CR detector , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  J A Seibert,et al.  Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems. , 2001, Medical physics.

[7]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system. , 2000, Medical physics.

[8]  P. Granfors,et al.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[9]  Hiroaki Yasuda,et al.  Improvement of image quality in CR mammography by detection of emissions from dual sides of an imaging plate , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Brian G. Rodricks,et al.  Development of a novel high-resolution direct conversion x-ray detector , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[11]  William Des Jardin,et al.  Large-format high-performance CCD sensor for medical x-ray applications , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Current status of full-field digital mammography. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[13]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[14]  B. Munier,et al.  Full field digital mammography scanner. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[15]  Kouhei Suzuki,et al.  Development and evaluation of a large-area selenium-based flat-panel detector for real-time radiography and fluoroscopy , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[16]  Shi Yin,et al.  Image quality of a prototype direct conversion detector for digital mammography , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[17]  M. Giger,et al.  Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[18]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  New CsI/a-Si 17" x 17" x-ray flat-panel detector provides superior detectivity and immediate direct digital output for general radiography systems , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[19]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a full-field digital-projection radiography detector , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[20]  J Yorkston,et al.  Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. , 1998, Medical physics.

[21]  D Gur,et al.  Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[22]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. , 1997, Medical physics.

[23]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[24]  A R Cowen,et al.  Visibility of microcalcifications in computed and screen-film mammography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Phillip C. Bunch.  Effects of reduced film granularity on mammographic image quality , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[26]  Brian G. Rodricks,et al.  Radiographic imaging characteristics of a direct conversion detector using selenium and thin film transistor array , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[27]  Daniel M. O'Mara,et al.  Prototype CCD-based detector for whole-breast digital mammography , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[28]  L L Fajardo,et al.  Digital mammography: performance considerations and current detector designs. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[29]  Youming Li,et al.  High-resolution amorphous silicon image sensor , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[30]  Matthew T. Freedman,et al.  Dual-energy in mammography: feasibility study , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[31]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology. , 1995, Medical physics.

[32]  Denny L. Y. Lee,et al.  New digital detector for projection radiography , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[33]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Large-area flat-panel amorphous silicon imagers , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[34]  A R Cowen,et al.  Physical evaluation of computed radiography as a mammographic X-ray imaging system. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[35]  A R Cowen,et al.  A clinical comparison between conventional and digital mammography utilizing computed radiography. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[36]  L. Garfinkel,et al.  Changing trends: An overview of breast cancer incidence and mortality , 1994, Cancer.

[37]  Y. Higashida,et al.  Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[38]  C Kimme-Smith,et al.  Digital mammography. A comparison of two digitization methods. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[39]  G Hermann,et al.  Occult malignant breast lesions in 114 patients: relationship to age and the presence of microcalcifications. , 1988, Radiology.

[40]  J W Oestmann,et al.  A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[41]  L. Tabár,et al.  Detection method, tumour size and node metastases in breast cancers diagnosed during a trial of breast cancer screening. , 1987, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[42]  Jan Howard,et al.  Using mammography for cancer control: An unrealized potential , 1987, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[43]  A Fenster,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results. , 1985, Medical physics.

[44]  J. Hendriks,et al.  REDUCTION OF BREAST CANCER MORTALITY THROUGH MASS SCREENING WITH MODERN MAMMOGRAPHY First Results of the Nijmegen Project, 1975 - 1981 , 1984, The Lancet.

[45]  E P Muntz.  On the comparison of actual and calculated improvements in the imaging of calcifications using magnification mammography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[46]  A. Stacey,et al.  The detection and significance of calcifications in the breast: a radiological and pathological study. , 1976, The British journal of radiology.

[47]  I Zamiri,et al.  Diphtheria today. Some experiences in Iran. , 1970, Lancet.