Effect of inversion time on the precision of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement quantification evaluated with synthetic inversion recovery MR imaging

AbstractObjectivesTo evaluate the influence of inversion time (TI) on the precision of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) quantification using synthetic inversion recovery (IR) imaging in patients with myocardial infarction (MI).MethodsFifty-three patients with suspected prior MI underwent 1.5-T cardiac MRI with conventional magnitude (MagIR) and phase-sensitive IR (PSIR) LGE imaging and T1 mapping at 15 min post-contrast. T1-based synthetic MagIR and PSIR images were calculated with a TI ranging from −100 to +150 ms at 5-ms intervals relative to the optimal TI (TI0). LGE was quantified using a five standard deviation (5SD) and full width at half-maximum (FWHM) thresholds. Measurements were compared using one-way analysis of variance.ResultsThe MagIRsy technique provided precise assessment of LGE area at TIs ≥ TI0, while precision was decreased below TI0. The LGE area showed significant differences at ≤ −25 ms compared to TI0 using 5SD (P < 0.001) and at ≤ −65 ms using the FWHM approach (P < 0.001). LGE measurements did not show significant difference over the analysed TI range in the PSIRsy images using either of the quantification methods.ConclusionsT1 map-based PSIRsy images provide precise quantification of MI independent of TI at the investigated time point post-contrast. MagIRsy-based MI quantification is precise at TI0 and at longer TIs while showing decreased precision at TI values below TI0.Key Points• Synthetic IR imaging retrospectively generates LGE images at any theoretical TI • Synthetic IR imaging can simulate the effect of TI on LGE quantification • Fifteen minutes post-contrast MagIRsyaccurately quantifies infarcts from TI0to TI0  + 150 ms • Fifteen minutes post-contrast PSIRsyprovides precise infarct size independent of TI • Synthetic IR imaging has further advantages in reducing operator dependence

[1]  Marie-Pierre Jolly,et al.  Motion correction for myocardial T1 mapping using image registration with synthetic image estimation , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Olga Bondarenko,et al.  Standardizing the definition of hyperenhancement in the quantitative assessment of infarct size and myocardial viability using delayed contrast-enhanced CMR. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[3]  R. Kim,et al.  How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[4]  Olga Bondarenko,et al.  Quantification of late gadolinium enhanced CMR in viability assessment in chronic ischemic heart disease: a comparison to functional outcome , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[5]  Dan W Rettmann,et al.  Accurate and Objective Infarct Sizing by Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Canine Myocardial Infarction Model , 2022 .

[6]  M. Robson,et al.  Influence of contrast agent dose and image acquisition timing on the quantitative determination of nonviable myocardial tissue using delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[7]  O. Simonetti,et al.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. , 2001, Radiology.

[8]  David M Higgins,et al.  Modified Look‐Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high‐resolution T1 mapping of the heart , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Adiabatic inversion pulses for myocardial T1 mapping , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Udo Sechtem,et al.  Effects of time, dose, and inversion time for acute myocardial infarct size measurements based on magnetic resonance imaging-delayed contrast enhancement. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  B. Brott,et al.  Equilibrium signal intensity mapping, an MRI method for fast mapping of longitudinal relaxation rates and for image enhancement. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  Marie-Pierre Jolly,et al.  Phase‐sensitive inversion recovery for myocardial T1 mapping with motion correction and parametric fitting , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Johan Kihlberg,et al.  Rapid T1 quantification based on 3D phase sensitive inversion recovery , 2010, BMC Medical Imaging.

[14]  Richard B Thompson,et al.  Saturation recovery single‐shot acquisition (SASHA) for myocardial T1 mapping , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  T. Ebbers,et al.  Simultaneous three-dimensional myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in one breath hold with 3D-QALAS , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[16]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Phase‐sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium‐delayed hyperenhancement † , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Stefan Neubauer,et al.  Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) for clinical myocardial T1-mapping at 1.5 and 3 T within a 9 heartbeat breathhold , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[18]  R. J. van der Geest,et al.  Age‐independent myocardial infarct quantification by signal intensity percent infarct mapping in swine , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  Mehmet Akçakaya,et al.  Combined saturation/inversion recovery sequences for improved evaluation of scar and diffuse fibrosis in patients with arrhythmia or heart rate variability , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  R. Kim,et al.  Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[21]  Julian L Wichmann,et al.  Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement: Accuracy of T1 Mapping-based Synthetic Inversion-Recovery Imaging. , 2016, Radiology.

[22]  James C Carr,et al.  ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Ra , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  P. Kellman,et al.  T1-mapping in the heart: accuracy and precision , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[24]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[25]  R. Geest,et al.  Infarct density distribution by MRI in the porcine model of acute and chronic myocardial infarction as a potential method transferable to the clinic , 2014, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.