During a recent 20-year period, 556 patients underwent operation for pulmonary metastasis at the Uni- versity of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor In- stitute at Houston. The surgical mortality was 1.5% for 772 resections. A selection of 443 patients was made to evaluate the contribution of operative intervention as a primary treatment, with selective adjunctive therapy when applica- ble. The success of a surgical approach is dependent primarily on adherence to selection criteria; it is important that only patients in whom all known disease can be com- pletely removed with the planned resection and who have full control of the primary site are treated. The overall survival for the group was 35%. For patients with carci- noma, survival ranged from 24% for those with primary uterine cervix tumors to approximately 54% for urinary tract, male genital tract, and corpus of uterus primary tumors. In the group with sarcoma, patients with skeletal tumors had a 46.4% survival rate (50.7% for those with osteogenic sarcoma), and 33% of the patients with soft tis- sue tumors had long-term survival. The outcome for pa- tients with melanoma was poor; only 12.1% survived 5 years. If the original criteria apply, multiple and bilateral lesions can be successfully managed. Patients undergoing planned adjuvant treatment had a superior outcome com- pared with those not so treated. However, a significant survival advantage was shown only for patients with sar- coma. The failure to control all disease in patients in whom pulmonary metastasis is controlled surgically can only be improved on through the use of systemically active adjuvant treatment. In the 14 years since Tarin (l) stated that metastatic dis- ease is the "Cinderella" of cancer therapy as well as of cancer research, clinical and research efforts have in- creasingly focused on this enigma. Although the under- standing of the biology of metastasis at the cellular level has increased dramatically (2-51, metastasis remains the major clinical problem of cancer management. With few exceptions, curative therapy is seldom possible in the presence of secondary spread. In selected patients, how-
[1]
P. Ward,et al.
Liver‐to‐lung traffic of cancer cells
,
1983,
International journal of cancer.
[2]
F. Gall,et al.
Surgical treatment of metastases to the lung and liver.
,
1981,
Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.
[3]
Temple Wj,et al.
Surgical management of isolated systemic metastases.
,
1980
.
[4]
K. Ramming.
Surgery for pulmonary metastases.
,
1980,
The Surgical clinics of North America.
[5]
P. Vassilopoulos,et al.
Surgical resection for metastatic neoplasms of the lung: Experience at the university of minnesota hospitals
,
1980,
Cancer.
[6]
P. McCormack,et al.
The changing role of surgery for pulmonary metastases.
,
1979,
The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[7]
S. Garattini,et al.
Cancer invasion and metastasis : biologic mechanisms and therapy
,
1977
.
[8]
D. Morton,et al.
Surgical Resection and Adjunctive lmmunotherapy for Selected Patients with Multiple Pulmonary Metastases
,
1973,
Annals of surgery.
[9]
D. Tarin.
Tissue interactions in carcinogenesis
,
1972
.
[10]
E. Sugarbaker,et al.
Do Metastases Metastasize?
,
1971,
Annals of surgery.
[11]
E. Gehan.
Estimating survival functions from the life table.
,
1969,
Journal of chronic diseases.