How Effective Is the Filtration of ‘KN95’ Filtering Facepiece Respirators During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Abstract Objectives The high demand of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) worldwide during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a critical situation for decision-makers regarding their supply. After authorizing the use of FFRs certified by other regions of the world, decision-makers in many countries have published alerts, particularly concerning the ‘KN95’ type. Methods This paper investigated the filtration performance of different FFRs using an experimental setup already employed during several studies on FFRs filtration performance. Its high-resolution measuring devices permit to determine filtration performance according to the normative criteria: the pressure drop and the filtration efficiency. Eight different FFRs have been used: four NIOSH-approved FFRs and four not NIOSH-approved with a ‘KN95’ shape available during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results The data show a high disparity between different FFRs purchased by healthcare establishments, and between those that are NIOSH-approved and those that are not NIOSH-approved. The results confirm that the NIOSH certification offers good protection according to the normative criteria. The ‘KN95’ types present pressure drops which correspond to the normative value, however their efficiencies are lower than the efficiencies of FFRs certified by NIOSH and lower than 95% at the most penetrate particle size. Conclusions FFRs marking is not sufficient to conclude on the FFRs’ efficiency. Visual inspection can not determine which samples are counterfeit or have manufacturing defects.

[2]  Yoshitake Masuda,et al.  α-Fe2O3ナノ構造体の形状制御合成:改良した光触媒分解効率のための表面特性の加工 , 2013 .

[3]  F. Haghighat,et al.  Filtration of nanoparticles applied in general ventilation , 2018, Science and Technology for the Built Environment.

[4]  Fariborz Haghighat,et al.  Evaluation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator Efficiency with Cyclic and Constant Flows , 2014, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[5]  Fariborz Haghighat,et al.  Validation of a Laboratory Test Bench for the Efficiency of an N95 Filtering Face Piece, using Simulated Occupational Exposure , 2015 .

[6]  Samy Rengasamy,et al.  Filtration Performance of NIOSH-Approved N95 and P100 Filtering Facepiece Respirators Against 4 to 30 Nanometer-Size Nanoparticles , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[7]  Janina Maier,et al.  Aerosol Measurement Principles Techniques And Applications , 2016 .

[8]  Tiina Reponen,et al.  Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  Fariborz Haghighat,et al.  Contribution of breathing frequency and inhalation flow rate on performance of N95 filtering facepiece respirators. , 2014, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[10]  Sheng-Hsiu Huang,et al.  Penetration of 4.5nm to aerosol particles through fibrous filters , 2007 .

[11]  H. Fissan,et al.  Filtration behavior of silver nanoparticle agglomerates and effects of the agglomerate model in data analysis , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[12]  R. Braddock,et al.  Filter efficiency as a function of nanoparticle velocity and shape , 2008 .

[13]  K. Okuyama,et al.  Filtration efficiency of a fibrous filter for nanoparticles , 2006 .

[14]  F. Haghighat,et al.  Particle loading time and humidity effects on the efficiency of an N95 filtering facepiece respirator model under constant and inhalation cyclic flows. , 2015, The Annals of occupational hygiene.