Exposure Measurement at Workplaces

Exposure to airborne nanomaterials has to be assessed in view of risk assessment. Although a large variety of aerosol measurement instruments exist that can be used for exposure assessment, the correct choice of instruments remains challenging, because it is affected by the desired metric(s) to be determined, the required time and size resolution, the needed accuracy as well as the size of the instruments. The latter determines whether the instruments are usable as personal samplers or monitors to measure the individual exposure, as portable instruments for mapping or screening measurement to detect potential sources of airborne nanomaterials or as static instruments for the characterization of the workplace aerosol in a single location. The accuracy and wealth of information generally decreases with decreasing size of the instruments. The choice of instruments therefore always remains a compromise. This chapter gives an overview on available measurement strategies for assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials in workplaces as well as on the available most commonly used commercial instrumentation.

[1]  Amy K Madl,et al.  Health effects of inhaled engineered and incidental nanoparticles , 2009, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[2]  Joakim Pagels,et al.  A set-up for field studies of respiratory tract deposition of fine and ultrafine particles in humans , 2006 .

[3]  H. Fissan,et al.  Rationale and principle of an instrument measuring lung deposited nanoparticle surface area , 2006 .

[4]  Heinz Fissan,et al.  Design and evaluation of a nanometer aerosol differential mobility analyzer (Nano-DMA) , 1998 .

[5]  H. Burtscher,et al.  Performance of water-based CPC 3788 for particles from a propane-flame soot-generator operated with rich fuel/air mixtures , 2013 .

[6]  Icrp Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 1994 .

[7]  Paul A. Baron,et al.  Calibration and Use of the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS 3300) , 1986 .

[8]  K. Driscoll ROLE OF INFLAMMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF RAT LUNG TUMORS IN RESPONSE TO CHRONIC PARTICLE EXPOSURE , 1996 .

[9]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Design and experimental evaluation of a new nanoparticle thermophoretic personal sampler , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[10]  W. A. Hoppel Determination of the aerosol size distribution from the mobility distribution of the charged fraction of aerosols , 1978 .

[11]  Flemming R. Cassee,et al.  Intrinsic hydroxyl radical generation measurements directly from sampled filters as a metric for the oxidative potential of ambient particulate matter , 2014 .

[12]  Michael Stintz,et al.  Characterization of Nanoparticle Release from Surface Coatings by the Simulation of a Sanding Process , 2010, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[13]  Heinz Fissan,et al.  Development of an Electrostatic Precipitator for Off-Line Particle Analysis , 1999 .

[14]  Xin Wang,et al.  The Relationship between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density , 2002 .

[15]  J. Aítken,et al.  On a Simple Pocket Dust-Counter. , 1892 .

[16]  Chun-Nan Liu,et al.  Novel active personal nanoparticle sampler for the exposure assessment of nanoparticles in workplaces. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  H. Fissan,et al.  Calibration and numerical simulation of Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (TSI Model 3550 NSAM) , 2006 .

[18]  Joakim Pagels,et al.  Size-Resolved Respiratory-Tract Deposition of Fine and Ultrafine Hydrophobic and Hygroscopic Aerosol Particles During Rest and Exercise , 2007, Inhalation toxicology.

[19]  E. Cunningham On the Velocity of Steady Fall of Spherical Particles through Fluid Medium , 1910 .

[20]  Cheol-Heon Jeong,et al.  Inter-Comparison of a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer and a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Incorporating an Ultrafine Water-Based Condensation Particle Counter , 2009 .

[21]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Measurement of Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates , 2004 .

[22]  John Aitken,et al.  On Improvements in the Apparatus for Counting the Dust Particles in the Atmosphere , 1890 .

[23]  M. Stolzenburg,et al.  A Laminar-Flow, Water-Based Condensation Particle Counter (WCPC) , 2005 .

[24]  T. Tritscher,et al.  Laboratory Characterization of a New Nano-Water-Based CPC 3788 and Performance Comparison to an Ultrafine Butanol-Based CPC 3776 , 2013 .

[25]  A. Wiedensohler,et al.  An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range , 1988 .

[26]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Total Surface Area Concentration Measurements of Nanoparticles in Gases with an Electrical Sensor , 2012 .

[27]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Design, Calibration, and Field Performance of a Miniature Diffusion Size Classifier , 2011 .

[28]  Heinz Fissan,et al.  Determination of particle size distributions by means of an electrostatic classifier , 1983 .

[29]  R. Flagan,et al.  Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer , 1990 .

[30]  D. Pui,et al.  A low pressure drop preseparator for elimination of particles larger than 450 nm , 2011 .

[31]  M Methner,et al.  Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the Identification and Measurement of Potential Inhalation Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials—Part A , 2010, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[32]  Characterization of four different bipolar charging devices for nanoparticle charge conditioning , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[33]  A. Peters,et al.  Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[34]  Anthony J. Marchese,et al.  A Personal, Thermophoretic Sampler for Airborne Nanoparticles , 2011 .

[35]  U. Vogel,et al.  Handbook of Nanosafety: Measurement, Exposure and Toxicology , 2014 .

[36]  G. Kasper,et al.  Functionality Based Detection of Airborne Engineered Nanoparticles in Quasi Real Time: A New Type of Detector and a New Metric , 2013, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[37]  H Kromhout,et al.  A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance. , 1997, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[38]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Characterization of Aerosol Surface Instruments in Transition Regime , 2005 .

[39]  Anshuman A. Lall,et al.  On-line measurement of ultrafine aggregate surface area and volume distributions by electrical mobility analysis: I. Theoretical analysis , 2006 .

[40]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  A submicron aerosol standard and the primary, absolute calibration of the condensation nuclei counter , 1974 .

[41]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Detection Efficiency of a Water-Based TSI Condensation Particle Counter 3785 , 2006 .

[42]  E. Frejafon,et al.  Particle Sampling by TEM Grid Filtration , 2013 .

[43]  Torsten Tritscher,et al.  NanoScan SMPS ? A Novel, Portable Nanoparticle Sizing and Counting Instrument , 2013 .

[44]  Dirk Dahmann,et al.  Comparison of four mobility particle sizers with different time resolution for stationary exposure measurements , 2009 .

[45]  H. Krug Impact of nanotechnological developments on the environment , 2010 .

[46]  H Fissan,et al.  Particle Characteristics in the Reactor and Pelletizing Areas of Carbon Black Production , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[47]  B. Gorbunov,et al.  Portable Planar DMA: Development and Tests , 2014 .

[48]  T. Novakov,et al.  The aethalometer — An instrument for the real-time measurement of optical absorption by aerosol particles , 1983 .

[49]  Delphine Bard,et al.  From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects , 2009 .

[50]  Dirk Dahmann,et al.  Comparability of portable nanoparticle exposure monitors. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[51]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review , 2011, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[52]  Charles L Geraci,et al.  A Strategy for Assessing Workplace Exposures to Nanomaterials , 2011, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[53]  Sotiris E Pratsinis,et al.  Aggregate Morphology Evolution by Sintering: Number & Diameter of Primary Particles. , 2012, Journal of aerosol science.

[54]  Matthias Voetz,et al.  Monitor for detecting and assessing exposure to airborne nanoparticles , 2010 .

[55]  K. Okuyama,et al.  Bipolar Charging of Aerosol Nanoparticles by a Soft X-ray Photoionizer , 2002 .

[56]  Carl Sunderman,et al.  A Handheld Electrostatic Precipitator for Sampling Airborne Particles and Nanoparticles , 2010 .

[57]  H. Fissan,et al.  Conceptual limitations and extensions of lung-deposited Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (NSAM) , 2009 .

[58]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Aerosol Measurement by Induced Currents , 2014 .

[59]  Kristen M Kulinowski,et al.  Nano Risk Analysis: Advancing the Science for Nanomaterials Risk Management , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[60]  Dirk Dahmann,et al.  Comparability of mobility particle sizers and diffusion chargers , 2013 .

[61]  P. Hoet,et al.  Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks , 2004, Journal of nanobiotechnology.

[62]  A. Berner,et al.  A new electromobility spectrometer for the measurement of aerosol size distributions in the size range from 1 to 1000 nm , 1991 .

[63]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  The History of Condensation Nucleus Counters , 2000 .

[64]  Keld Alstrup Jensen,et al.  Comparison of dust released from sanding conventional and nanoparticle-doped wall and wood coatings , 2010, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[65]  Araceli Sánchez Jiménez,et al.  Nanotechnology and Exposure Scenarios , 2014 .

[66]  T. Kuhlbusch,et al.  Mathematical Description of Experimentally Determined Charge Distributions of a Unipolar Diffusion Charger , 2011 .

[67]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Optimisation of a thermophoretic personal sampler for nanoparticle exposure studies , 2009 .

[68]  T Renée Anthony,et al.  A personal nanoparticle respiratory deposition (NRD) sampler. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[69]  Craig A. Poland,et al.  Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[70]  Thomas Kuhlbusch,et al.  Particle and Fibre Toxicology BioMed Central Review The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC , 2006 .

[71]  Jing Wang,et al.  The effect of particle morphology on unipolar diffusion charging of nanoparticle agglomerates in the transition regime , 2010 .

[72]  David Y. H. Pui,et al.  The Effect of Particle Pre-Existing Charge on Unipolar Charging and Its Implication on Electrical Aerosol Measurements , 2009 .

[73]  Güunter Oberdürster Toxicology of ultrafine particles: in vivo studies , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[74]  William A Heitbrink,et al.  The mapping of fine and ultrafine particle concentrations in an engine machining and assembly facility. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[75]  Kikuo Okuyama,et al.  Bipolar Diffusion Charging for Aerosol Nanoparticle Measurement Using a Soft X-ray Charger , 2005 .

[76]  T A J Kuhlbusch,et al.  Number Size Distribution, Mass Concentration, and Particle Composition of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 in Bag Filling Areas of Carbon Black Production , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.