Cross-modal impacts of anthropogenic noise on information use

Anthropogenic noise is a global pollutant, and there is rapidly accumulating evidence of impacts on a range of animal taxa [1,2]. While many studies have considered how additional noise may affect information provision and use, they have focused on the masking and consequent alteration of acoustic signals and cues; so-called unimodal effects [3]. Using field-based experimental trials on habituated wild dwarf mongooses (Helogale parvula) [4], we combine sound playbacks and faecal presentations to demonstrate that anthropogenic noise can disrupt responses to information from different sensory modalities. The adaptive, stronger response exhibited towards predator faeces compared with control faeces in ambient-noise conditions was detrimentally affected by road-noise playback. Specifically, having taken longer to detect the faeces, the mongooses interacted less with the predator cue, did not show increased vigilance following its detection, and spent less time in the safe vicinity of a burrow refuge, thus suffering a potentially increased predation risk. Our results are the first to show that anthropogenic noise could alter responses to olfactory cues, strongly indicating the possibility of cross-modal impacts of noise pollution on information use [3].

[1]  George Wittemyer,et al.  A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife , 2016, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  Marta B. Manser,et al.  The function of mobbing in cooperative meerkats , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  E. Morley,et al.  The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Age differences in the response of California ground Squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) to avian and mammalian predators. , 1997, Journal of comparative psychology.

[5]  S. Simpson,et al.  Anthropogenic noise increases fish mortality by predation , 2016, Nature Communications.

[6]  Wouter Halfwerk,et al.  Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance , 2015, Biology Letters.

[7]  P. Marler,et al.  Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. , 1980, Science.

[8]  A. Radford,et al.  Anthropogenic noise disrupts use of vocal information about predation risk. , 2016, Environmental pollution.

[9]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The effects of recruitment to direct predator cues on predator responses in meerkats , 2013 .

[10]  Donald H. Owings,et al.  The effects of wind turbines on antipredator behavior in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) , 2006 .

[11]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[12]  Hon Keung Tony Ng,et al.  Statistics: An Introduction Using R , 2006, Technometrics.

[13]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Anthropogenic noise affects risk assessment and attention: the distracted prey hypothesis , 2010, Biology Letters.

[14]  A. Radford,et al.  Call of duty? Variation in use of the watchman's song by sentinel dwarf mongooses, Helogale parvula , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  R. Apfelbach,et al.  The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: A review of field and laboratory studies , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[16]  A. Radford,et al.  Sentinel dwarf mongooses, Helogale parvula, exhibit flexible decision making in relation to predation risk , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  L. Sharpe,et al.  The presence of an avian co-forager reduces vigilance in a cooperative mammal , 2010, Biology Letters.

[18]  S. Sumner,et al.  Sentinel dominance status influences forager use of social information , 2016 .

[19]  J. R. Houghton,et al.  Anthropogenic Noise Affects Behavior across Sensory Modalities , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[20]  A. Radford,et al.  Rival group scent induces changes in dwarf mongoose immediate behavior and subsequent movement , 2016 .