Benefits of Biotic Pollination for Non-Timber Forest Products and Cultivated Plants

Biodiversity supplies multiple goods and services to society and is critical for the support of livelihoods across the globe. Many indigenous people depend upon non-timber forest products (NTFP) and crops for a range of goods including food, medicine, fibre and construction materials. However, the dependency of these products on biotic pollination services is poorly understood. We used the biologically and culturally diverse Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve in India to characterise the types of NTFP and crop products of 213 plant species and asses their degree of dependency on animal pollination. We found that 80 per cent of all species benefited from animal pollination in their reproduction, and that 62 per cent of crop products and 40 per cent of NTFP benefited from biotic pollination in their production. Further we identified the likely pollinating taxa documented as responsible for the production of these products, mainly bees and other insects. A lower proportion of indigenous plant products (39 per cent) benefited from biotic pollination than products from introduced plants (61 per cent). We conclude that pollinators play an important role in the livelihoods of people in this region.

[1]  Theresa,et al.  Bee Pollination in Agricultural Ecosystems , 2010 .

[2]  J. Settele,et al.  Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline , 2009 .

[3]  S. Potts,et al.  Social bees and food plant associations in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, India , 2009 .

[4]  R. James Bee Pollination in Agricultural Eco-systems , 2008 .

[5]  K. Schreckenberg,et al.  Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: A Reality Check , 2007 .

[6]  A. Klein,et al.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  R. Achdiawan,et al.  Balancing development and conservation? An assessment of livelihood and environmental outcomes of Nontimber Forest Product Trade in Asia, Africa, and Latin America , 2006 .

[8]  A. P. Schaffers,et al.  Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands , 2006, Science.

[9]  J. Clarke,et al.  Pollinators and pollination: a resource book for policy and practice. , 2006 .

[10]  P. Shanley,et al.  Riches of the forest: food, spices, crafts and resins of Asia , 2004 .

[11]  T. Itioka,et al.  Six-Year Population Fluctuation of the Giant Honey Bee Apis dorsata (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a Tropical Lowland Dipterocarp Forest in Sarawak , 2001 .

[12]  K. Seethalakshmi,et al.  BIODIVERSITY IN TROPICAL MOIST FORESTS: A STUDY OF SUSTAINABLE USE OF NON -WOOD FOREST PRODUCTS IN THE WESTERN GHATS, KERALA Monitoring and Evaluation of Ecological and Socio-economic Variables , 1999 .

[13]  David W. Inouye,et al.  ENDANGERED MUTUALISMS: The Conservation of Plant-Pollinator Interactions , 1998 .

[14]  J. Cane The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields , 1997 .

[15]  Gary Paul Nabhan,et al.  The Forgotten Pollinators , 1996 .

[16]  D. Roubik,et al.  Pollination of cultivated plants in the tropics. , 1995 .

[17]  P. Durst,et al.  Non -Wood Forest Products in Asia , 1994 .

[18]  P. Srivastava Pollination mechanisms in genus Terminalia Linn. , 1993 .

[19]  J. D. Beer,et al.  The economic value of non-timber forest products in Southeast Asia , 1989 .