OBJECTIVES
American Indians (AI's) have the lowest rate of seatbelt use in the nation, putting them at significant risk for motor vehicle crash (MVC) morbidity and mortality. This study compares seatbelt use in victims of level one trauma crashes presenting from on and off AI reservations. Predictors of seatbelt use were evaluated as well. We hypothesized that AI's in crashes on a reservation would have lower rates of seatbelt use, even compared to AI's in crashes from off the reservation.
METHODS
This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive MVC victims presenting to a level one trauma facility in Phoenix, Arizona from July 2003 to June 2005. Inclusion criteria were age >11 and transported directly from the crash; struck pedestrians were excluded. Inter-facility transports were also excluded, as these patients would likely represent a sicker population, possibly introducing bias. Characteristics of those patients (sex, race, location of crash, alcohol and seatbelt use) were analyzed in univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS
Data were collected on 2339 patients. Three hundred ninety-two were excluded, leaving 1947 (83%) available for analysis. AI's had lower rates of seatbelt use compared to all other races. Additionally, AI's on a reservation were less likely to wear seatbelts than those off a reservation (25.9% versus 42.7%). However, when tested in a multivariate analysis with alcohol as a covariate, race and location became insignificant. Low seatbelt use by AI's on the reservation was primarily associated with alcohol use.
CONCLUSION
In this analysis, alcohol, rather than race or location, is the overriding predictor of seatbelt use. This study compared patients that were in crashes, and only those triaged to a level one trauma facility. If we assume unbelted passengers are more severely injured, this would bias our results. The application of these data may help direct future public service efforts to increase seatbelt use in target populations.
[1]
Ruth A. Shults,et al.
Impact of primary laws on adult use of safety belts--United States, 2002.
,
2004,
MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.
[2]
Paul D. Allison,et al.
Logistic Regression Using the SAS System : Theory and Application
,
1999
.
[3]
Eduard Zaloshnja,et al.
Reducing injuries among Native Americans: five cost-outcome analyses.
,
2003,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[4]
Shankuan Zhu,et al.
A comprehensive statewide analysis of seatbelt non-use with injury and hospital admissions: new data, old problem.
,
2006,
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[5]
John M. Boyle,et al.
Motor vehicle occupant safety survey
,
1995
.
[6]
J Moran,et al.
Motor-vehicle crash-injury risk factors among American Indians.
,
1997,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[7]
Andrew Steptoe,et al.
Seatbelt use, attitudes, and changes in legislation: an international study.
,
2002,
American journal of preventive medicine.
[8]
James L Nichols,et al.
Effectiveness of primary enforcement safety belt laws and enhanced enforcement of safety belt laws: a summary of the Guide to Community Preventive Services systematic reviews.
,
2004,
Journal of safety research.
[9]
G. Babio,et al.
Factors associated with seatbelt, helmet, and child safety seat use in a spanish high-risk injury area.
,
2006,
The Journal of trauma.
[10]
M G Solomon,et al.
Safety Belt Use Estimate for Native American Tribal Reservations
,
2005
.
[11]
C. Bay,et al.
Motor vehicle crash fatalities by race/ethnicity in Arizona, 1990–96
,
2003,
Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.