A non‐parametric statistical test to compare clusters with applications in functional magnetic resonance imaging data

Statistical inference of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data is an important tool in neuroscience investigation. One major hypothesis in neuroscience is that the presence or not of a psychiatric disorder can be explained by the differences in how neurons cluster in the brain. Therefore, it is of interest to verify whether the properties of the clusters change between groups of patients and controls. The usual method to show group differences in brain imaging is to carry out a voxel-wise univariate analysis for a difference between the mean group responses using an appropriate test and to assemble the resulting 'significantly different voxels' into clusters, testing again at cluster level. In this approach, of course, the primary voxel-level test is blind to any cluster structure. Direct assessments of differences between groups at the cluster level seem to be missing in brain imaging. For this reason, we introduce a novel non-parametric statistical test called analysis of cluster structure variability (ANOCVA), which statistically tests whether two or more populations are equally clustered. The proposed method allows us to compare the clustering structure of multiple groups simultaneously and also to identify features that contribute to the differential clustering. We illustrate the performance of ANOCVA through simulations and an application to an fMRI dataset composed of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and controls. Results show that there are several differences in the clustering structure of the brain between them. Furthermore, we identify some brain regions previously not described to be involved in the ADHD pathophysiology, generating new hypotheses to be tested. The proposed method is general enough to be applied to other types of datasets, not limited to fMRI, where comparison of clustering structures is of interest.

[1]  F. Xavier Castellanos,et al.  Large-scale brain systems in ADHD: beyond the prefrontal–striatal model , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Joseph T. Chang,et al.  Spectral biclustering of microarray data: coclustering genes and conditions. , 2003, Genome research.

[3]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  The discovery of population differences in network community structure: New methods and applications to brain functional networks in schizophrenia , 2012, NeuroImage.

[4]  James Bailey,et al.  Clustering Similarity Comparison Using Density Profiles , 2006, Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[5]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[6]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Andreas J Fallgatter,et al.  Reduced Neural Error Signaling in Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex in Young Adults With ADHD , 2014, Journal of attention disorders.

[8]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Andrew H. Sung,et al.  A Similarity Measure for Clustering and its Applications , 2008 .

[10]  Lincoln D. Stein,et al.  Towards a cyberinfrastructure for the biological sciences: progress, visions and challenges , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  M. Seghier The Angular Gyrus , 2013, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[12]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .

[13]  Qin Yang,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Data Using Improved Self-Organizing Mapping and Spatio-Temporal Metric Hierarchical Clustering , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Francesco Bertoni,et al.  Hierarchical clustering analysis of pathologic and molecular data identifies prognostically and biologically distinct groups of colorectal carcinomas , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[15]  S. Grossberg The complementary brain: unifying brain dynamics and modularity , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  John Suckling,et al.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Jin Fan,et al.  Common and unique therapeutic mechanisms of stimulant and nonstimulant treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2012, Archives of general psychiatry.

[18]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[19]  M. Rietschel,et al.  Adolescent impulsivity phenotypes characterized by distinct brain networks , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Ayala Cohen,et al.  Language Deficit With Attention-Deficit Disorder: A Prevalent Comorbidity , 1998, Journal of child neurology.

[21]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[22]  M. Meilă Comparing clusterings---an information based distance , 2007 .

[23]  H. Hotelling The Generalization of Student’s Ratio , 1931 .

[24]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Spectral Clustering: Analysis and an algorithm , 2001, NIPS.

[25]  S. Petersen,et al.  Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Alexandre Galvão Patriota,et al.  A non-parametric method to estimate the number of clusters , 2014, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[27]  A. Ravishankar Rao,et al.  A Cluster Overlap Measure for Comparison of Activations in fMRI Studies , 2009, MICCAI.

[28]  Edmund J Crampin,et al.  Biclustering reveals breast cancer tumour subgroups with common clinical features and improves prediction of disease recurrence , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[29]  Carlos H. Acuña The ADHD-200 Consortium: a model to advance the translational potential of neuroimaging in clinical neuroscience , 2012 .

[30]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[31]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Parietal attentional system aberrations during target detection in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: event-related fMRI evidence. , 2006, The American journal of psychiatry.

[32]  Nicole M. Long,et al.  Journal of the American Statistical Association Spatio-spectral Mixed-effects Model for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Spatio-spectral Mixed-effects Model for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2022 .

[33]  Nick C Fox,et al.  The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[34]  J B Woodward,et al.  The Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Center (fMRIDC): the challenges and rewards of large-scale databasing of neuroimaging studies. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[35]  Jenifer Juranek,et al.  Functional disruption of the brain mechanism for reading: effects of comorbidity and task difficulty among children with developmental learning problems. , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[36]  Michael P Milham,et al.  The neural correlates of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an ALE meta-analysis. , 2006, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.