Is the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Angle Predictive for Pelvic Tilt in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients?

Study Design: This was a retrospective radiographic study. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between pelvic tilt (PT) and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle (SFP angle) in AIS patients and to clarify whether the predictability of PT is affected by different curve patterns. Summary of Background Data: Pelvic retroversion is one of the compensatory mechanisms to maintain upright position and is also tied to health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, measurement of spino-pelvic parameters including PT may not be accurate because of difficulty in visualizing femoral heads on lateral radiographs in some patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, 101 female AIS patients were recruited. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: thoracic scoliosis (TS) and lumbar scoliosis (LS) group. Long-cassette standing upright radiographs were obtained; PT and SFP angles were measured through digital analysis software (Surgimap Spine Software, New York, NY). The relations between PT and SFP angle were determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Linear regressions between PT and SFP angle were also performed. Results: The SFP angle was strongly correlated with PT in both groups, and PT could be estimated by the formulas: PT=74.052−0.991×SFP angle in the TS group and PT=65.345−0.881×SFP angle in the LS group. In the TS group, the SFP angle correlated with PT strongly with a Pearson coefficient of 0.65. Whereas in the LS group, the coefficient was weaker than that in the TS group (0.48 vs. 0.65); however, it still showed that PT was significantly associated with SFP. Conclusions: Given the high correlation between PT and SFP angle, the SFP angle should be considered a reliable alternative option to PT, which has routinely excellent visibility in coronal films in AIS patients. The predictability was more accurate for AIS patients with thoracic curves than with lumbar curves.

[1]  B. Qian,et al.  Pelvic tilt and trunk inclination: new predictive factors in curve progression during the Milwaukee bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[2]  Wang Weijun,et al.  Comparison of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment in Chinese Adolescents With and Without Idiopathic Thoracic Scoliosis , 2012, Spine.

[3]  Boštjan Likar,et al.  A review of methods for evaluating the quantitative parameters of sagittal pelvic alignment. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  A. Reyes-Sánchez,et al.  Differences in pelvic parameters among Mexican, Caucasian, and Asian populations. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  Y. Qiu,et al.  Anatomical study of the pelvis in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2012, Journal of anatomy.

[6]  F. Schwab,et al.  Sacro-femoral-pubic angle: a coronal parameter to estimate pelvic tilt , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[7]  S. Chung,et al.  Normal Patterns of Sagittal Alignment of the Spine in Young Adults Radiological Analysis in a Korean Population , 2011, Spine.

[8]  J. Mac-Thiong,et al.  Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[9]  J. Mac-Thiong,et al.  Pediatric sagittal alignment , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[10]  S. Aunoble,et al.  Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[11]  M. Rousseau,et al.  Hip–spine relations and sagittal balance clinical consequences , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[12]  B. Qian,et al.  The influence of elastic orthotic belt on sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis: a comparative radiographic study with Milwaukee brace , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[13]  J. Auerbach,et al.  Variations in Pelvic and Other Sagittal Spinal Parameters as a Function of Race in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2010, Spine.

[14]  Hiroto Kobayashi,et al.  Clasped position for measurement of sagittal spinal alignment , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[15]  Ashish Patel,et al.  Pelvic Tilt and Truncal Inclination: Two Key Radiographic Parameters in the Setting of Adults With Spinal Deformity , 2009, Spine.

[16]  Marc A. Asher,et al.  Transverse plane pelvic rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: primary or compensatory? , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[17]  A. Crawford,et al.  Analysis of Sagittal Alignment in Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: How Do These Two Curve Types Differ? , 2007, Spine.

[18]  C. Schmidt,et al.  A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: The conditions required for an economic standing position , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  R. Betz,et al.  Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[20]  L. Lenke,et al.  Reliability Analysis for Digital Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Measurements , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[21]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Sagittal Alignment of the Spine and Pelvis During Growth , 2004, Spine.

[22]  U. Jaeger,et al.  A new MRI technique for imaging scoliosis in the sagittal plane , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[23]  J. Hecquet,et al.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves , 1998, European Spine Journal.