Cartilage volume quantification via Live Wire segmentation.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES A reduction in cartilage volume is characteristic of osteoarthritis and hence there exists a need for an accurate and reproducible method to measure in vivo cartilage volume. Quantification of cartilage volume from magnetic resonance (MR) images requires a segmentation technique such as the user-driven "Live Wire" strategy that can reliably delineate object volumes in a time-efficient manner. In the present work, the accuracy and reproducibility of the Live Wire method for the quantification of cartilage volume in MR images is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS The accuracy of the Live Wire method was assessed by comparing the MR-based volume measurement of a patellar cartilage-shaped phantom versus data calculated via water displacement. The inter- and intra-operator reproducibility of the technique was evaluated from Live Wire segmentation of the patellar cartilage volume from fat-suppressed 3-dimensional spoiled-gradient-echo images of five healthy human volunteers performed by three operators. To provide data for analysis of inter-scan reproducibility, the human scans were repeated five times with the aid of a leg-restraining jig to minimize repositioning error. RESULTS The volume of the patellar cartilage-shaped phantom measured via Live Wire segmentation of MR images was within 97.8% of its true volume. The average inter- and intra-operator coefficients of variation of three operators were 3.0% and 0.4%, respectively. The average inter-scan coefficient of variation of five repeated scans of each volunteer was 2.7%. CONCLUSION The data suggest that the Live Wire strategy is an accurate, reproducible, and efficient technique to measure cartilage volume in vivo in a feasible amount of operator time.

[1]  Claude Kauffmann,et al.  Computer-aided method for quantification of cartilage thickness and volume changes using MRI: validation study using a synthetic model , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  E M Braunstein,et al.  Relationship between arthroscopic evidence of cartilage damage and radiographic evidence of joint space narrowing in early osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1991, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[4]  K. Brandt,et al.  Radiographic grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis: relation of the Kellgren and Lawrence grade to a grade based on joint space narrowing, and correlation with arthroscopic evidence of articular cartilage degeneration. , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  C C Glüer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. , 1994, Radiology.

[6]  P. Sambrook,et al.  The association of cartilage volume with knee pain. , 2003, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[7]  K. Brandt,et al.  Effect of alignment of the medial tibial plateau and x-ray beam on apparent progression of osteoarthritis in the standing anteroposterior knee radiograph. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  F Eckstein,et al.  In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  C J Taylor,et al.  The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Early radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with substantial changes in cartilage volume and tibial bone surface area in both males and females. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

[11]  R Burgkart,et al.  Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI). , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  D G Disler,et al.  Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images. , 1996, Radiology.

[13]  X FalcãoAlexandre,et al.  User-steered image segmentation paradigms , 1998 .

[14]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  User-Steered Image Segmentation Paradigms: Live Wire and Live Lane , 1998, Graph. Model. Image Process..

[15]  The influence of the resolution and contrast on measuring the articular cartilage volume in magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[16]  T Stammberger,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  W E Palmer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with three-dimensional MR imaging. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[18]  F Eckstein,et al.  Repeatability of patellar cartilage thickness patterns in the living, using a fat‐suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequence with short acquisition time and three‐dimensinal data processing , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  L D Hall,et al.  Measurement of localized cartilage volume and thickness of human knee joints by computer analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[20]  J. Carbonell,et al.  Knee osteoarthritis: interpretation variability of radiological signs , 2004, Clinical Rheumatology.

[21]  Johanne Martel-Pelletier,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of knee osteoarthritis progression over two years and correlation with clinical symptoms and radiologic changes. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  W A Barrett,et al.  A PC-based 3D imaging system: algorithms, software, and hardware considerations. , 1990, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[23]  T. Stammberger,et al.  Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: Computational method and reproducibility in the living , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.