How to Make the Best Use of Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring? Experience in 1162 Consecutive Spinal Deformity Surgical Procedures

Study Design. A retrospective study of 1162 consecutive patients who underwent spinal deformity surgical procedures at our spine center from January 2010 to December 2013. Objective. To develop and evaluate a protocol of intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring with the warning criteria we had established on the basis of our clinical experiences and the review of previous literature. Summary of Background Data. Though MEPs monitoring have become widely used in spinal deformity surgery, different alarm criteria and response protocol used in different studies compromised their comparability; Furthermore, high false-positive rate of MEP reported by previous studies has become an increasingly prominent problem that will limit its clinical use and development. Methods. The intraoperative monitoring data of 1162 consecutive patients who underwent spinal deformity surgical procedures at our spine center were retrospectively analyzed. Age, sex, diagnosis, preoperative neurological status, intraspinal anomalies, baseline MEP, and MEP change were collected. The protocol with the warning criteria we had established was used. The false-positive rate, false-negative rate, and positive predictive value were calculated. Results. Significant intraoperative changes were seen in the MEP data in 52 (4.4%) of all the cases. In 25 cases among which, significant MEP changes were synchronously and logically associated with high-risk surgical maneuver (pedicle screw insertion, osteotomy, correction, etc.). The false-positive rate of MEP monitoring was 0.26% (3/1140), whereas the sensitivity and specificity of MEP for detection of clinically significant intraoperative cord injury were 100% and 99.7%, respectively. The positive predictive value of a MEP alert in terms of a new postoperative neurological deficit was 83.3%. Conclusion. Our study indicates that the appropriate use of MEP monitoring based on our protocol is able to obtain satisfying sensitivity and specificity and thus provide important information for intraoperative decision making. Level of Evidence: 4

[1]  K. Park,et al.  Pattern-specific changes and discordant prognostic values of individual leg-muscle motor evoked potentials during spinal surgery , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  T. Yoshii,et al.  Warning Thresholds on the Basis of Origin of Amplitude Changes in Transcranial Electrical Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring for Cervical Compression Myelopathy , 2012, Spine.

[3]  S. Lewis,et al.  Neurophysiological Changes in Deformity Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With Intraoperative Skull-Femoral Traction , 2011, Spine.

[4]  A. Møller,et al.  Techniques of intraoperative monitoring for spinal cord function: their past, present, and future directions , 2011, Neurological research.

[5]  R. Michelucci,et al.  The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[6]  I. Zaltz,et al.  Successful Monitoring of Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials With Isoflurane and Nitrous Oxide in Scoliosis Surgeries , 2010, Spine.

[7]  L. Lenke,et al.  Validity and Reliability of Intraoperative Monitoring in Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: A 23-Year Experience of 3436 Surgical Cases , 2010, Spine.

[8]  S. Tan,et al.  The value of bilateral ipsilateral and contralateral motor evoked potential monitoring in scoliosis surgery , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[9]  J. Lagopoulos,et al.  Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials Combined With Response Recording Through Compound Muscle Action Potential as the Sole Modality of Spinal Cord Monitoring in Spinal Deformity Surgery , 2008, Spine.

[10]  E. Woodard,et al.  Risk Factors for False Positive Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring Alerts During Surgical Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy , 2007, Spine.

[11]  D. Langeloo,et al.  Criteria for transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal deformity surgery A review and discussion of the literature , 2007, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  J. R. Bowen,et al.  Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  T. Tamaki,et al.  History of the development of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[14]  A. Sestokas,et al.  Neurophysiological Identification of Position-Induced Neurologic Injury During Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery , 2006, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[15]  Moe R. Lim,et al.  Characterization of Neurophysiologic Alerts During Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery , 2006, Spine.

[16]  Leisha L Osburn,et al.  A Guide to the Performance of Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials. Part 1. Basic Concepts, Recording Parameters, Special Considerations, and Application , 2006, American journal of electroneurodiagnostic technology.

[17]  T. Albert,et al.  Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  R. Slappendel,et al.  Transcranial Electrical Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring During Surgery for Spinal Deformity: A Study of 145 Patients , 2003, Spine.

[19]  W Harris,et al.  Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[20]  L. Lenke,et al.  Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring for pediatric patients with spinal cord pathology undergoing spinal deformity surgery. , 1999, Spine.

[21]  S. Jones,et al.  Motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery: responses of distal limb muscles to transcranial cortical stimulation with pulse trains. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  K. Klose,et al.  Isoflurane-induced attenuation of motor evoked potentials caused by electrical motor cortex stimulation during surgery. , 1991, Journal of neurosurgery.

[23]  C. Wikkelsø,et al.  A late neurologic complication of scoliosis surgery in connection with syringomyelia. , 1979, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.