Scale-invariant anomaly detection with multiscale group-sparse models

The automatic detection of anomalies, defined as patterns that are not encountered in representative set of normal images, is an important problem in industrial control and biomedical applications. We have shown that this problem can be successfully addressed by the sparse representation of individual image patches using a dictionary learned from a large set of patches extracted from normal images. Anomalous patches are detected as those for which the sparse representation on this dictionary exceeds sparsity or error tolerances. Unfortunately, this solution is not suitable for many real-world visual inspection-systems since it is not scale invariant: since the dictionary is learned at a single scale, patches in normal images acquired at a different magnification level might be detected as anomalous. We present an anomaly-detection algorithm that learns a dictionary that is invariant to a range of scale changes, and overcomes this limitation by use of an appropriate sparse coding stage. The algorithm was successfully tested in an industrial application by analyzing a dataset of Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images, which typically exhibit different magnification levels.

[1]  Michael Elad,et al.  Learning Multiscale Sparse Representations for Image and Video Restoration , 2007, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[2]  Brendt Wohlberg,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Convolutional Sparse Representations , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Israel Cohen,et al.  Multiscale Anomaly Detection Using Diffusion Maps , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[4]  Brendt Wohlberg,et al.  Novelty detection in images by sparse representations , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on Intelligent Embedded Systems (IES).

[5]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations , 2002, NIPS.

[6]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[7]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Support Vector Method for Novelty Detection , 1999, NIPS.

[8]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[9]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Novelty detection: a review - part 1: statistical approaches , 2003, Signal Process..

[10]  Brendt Wohlberg,et al.  Detecting anomalous structures by convolutional sparse models , 2015, 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[11]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  Harold G. Craighead,et al.  Applications of controlled electrospinning systems , 2011 .

[13]  Graham W. Taylor,et al.  Deconvolutional networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  Pascal Frossard,et al.  Dictionary Learning , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[15]  Michael Elad,et al.  Sparse Coding with Anomaly Detection , 2013, Journal of Signal Processing Systems.

[16]  S. Ramakrishna,et al.  A review on electrospinning design and nanofibre assemblies , 2006, Nanotechnology.

[17]  David A. Clifton,et al.  A review of novelty detection , 2014, Signal Process..

[18]  Daniel N. Rockmore,et al.  Bayesian Learning of Sparse Multiscale Image Representations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  VARUN CHANDOLA,et al.  Anomaly detection: A survey , 2009, CSUR.

[20]  Israel Cohen,et al.  Defect detection in patterned wafers using anisotropic kernels , 2010, Machine Vision and Applications.

[21]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Novelty detection: a review - part 2: : neural network based approaches , 2003, Signal Process..

[22]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Learning Sparse Image Codes using a Wavelet Pyramid Architecture , 2000, NIPS.

[23]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Fast matching pursuit with a multiscale dictionary of Gaussian chirps , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  Michael Brady,et al.  Novelty detection for the identification of masses in mammograms , 1995 .