Protocol sequences for multiple-packet reception: Throughput invariance and user irrepressibility

We consider the slot-synchronized collision channel without feedback, in which K active users all transmit their packets to one sink. It is assumed that the channel has the ability of the multiple-packet reception (MPR), i.e., can accommodate at most γ (1 ≤ γ <; K) simultaneous transmissions. Each user accesses the channel following a specific periodical zero-one pattern, called the protocol sequence, and transmits a packet if and only if the sequence value is equal to one. The fluctuation in throughput is incurred by random relative delay offsets among the beginning of protocol sequences due to the lack of feedback. There are two different design goals in the literature: throughput invariance and user irrepressibility. The former one enjoys constant throughput independent of relative delay offsets, and the latter one guarantees a non-zero individual throughput in the worst case. However, all previous performance evaluation on these two criteria assumed that γ= 1. In this paper, we generalize these results to any γ > 1. For both design objective, we establish a lower bound on sequence period and prove the lower bound can be achieved by some construction.

[1]  Kenneth W. Shum,et al.  A tight asymptotic bound on the size of constant-weight conflict-avoiding codes , 2010, Des. Codes Cryptogr..

[2]  Kenneth W. Shum,et al.  On pairwise shift-invariant protocol sequences , 2009, IEEE Communications Letters.

[3]  Muriel Medard,et al.  Multi packet reception and network coding† , 2010, 2010 - MILCOM 2010 MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE.

[4]  Kenneth W. Shum,et al.  Shift-Invariant Protocol Sequences for the Collision Channel Without Feedback , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Kenneth W. Shum,et al.  A General Upper Bound on the Size of Constant-Weight Conflict-Avoiding Codes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Fulvio Babich,et al.  Theoretical analysis of asynchronous multi-packet reception in 802.11 networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[7]  James L. Massey,et al.  The collision channel without feedback , 1985, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Kenneth W. Shum,et al.  Design and construction of protocol sequences: Shift invariance and user irrepressibility , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[9]  Soung Chang Liew,et al.  How Does Multiple-Packet Reception Capability Scale the Performance of Wireless Local Area Networks? , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[10]  Alex J. Grant,et al.  The collision channel with recovery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Toby Berger,et al.  Carrier Sense Multiple Access Communications on Multipacket Reception Channels: Theory and Applications to IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  Meinard Müller,et al.  Constant Weight Conflict-Avoiding Codes , 2007, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[13]  Rudolf Ahlswede,et al.  Network information flow , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[14]  Kenneth W. Shum,et al.  Construction and Applications of CRT Sequences , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[15]  Vikram Srinivasan,et al.  Design and Analysis of an Acknowledgment-Aware Asynchronous MPR MAC Protocol for Distributed WLANs , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[16]  László Györfi,et al.  Constructions of binary constant-weight cyclic codes and cyclically permutable codes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Muriel Médard,et al.  MAC Centered Cooperation — Synergistic Design of Network Coding, Multi-Packet Reception, and Improved Fairness to Increase Network Throughput , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[18]  W. S. Wong New Protocol Sequences for Random-Access Channels Without Feedback , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[19]  Lang Tong,et al.  Stability and delay of finite-user slotted ALOHA with multipacket reception , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.